Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Delhi High Court Sets Aside TDS Deduction Order for E-Commerce Firm, Citing ‘Mechanical’ Issuance and Lack of Reasoning

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on November 7, 2023, the Delhi High Court has quashed an order by the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax concerning the rate of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) applicable to Shreyash Retail Private Ltd., an e-commerce retail company. The court’s decision pointed out a crucial lapse in the administrative process, emphasizing that the order was “mechanically” issued without due application of mind.

The bench, led by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, criticized the respondent, Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax TDS Circle 77(1), for issuing a certificate allowing a TDS deduction at 0.5% instead of the 0.01% sought by the petitioner. The court’s observation was stark: “We find that the reasons furnished by the Respondent No. 1 qua the Application i.e., as to why the Petitioners’ request that TDS should not be deducted at a rate of 0.01% (zero point zero one per cent), hinges on broad generalizations…and accordingly has been issued mechanically reflecting non-application of mind.”

The ruling scrutinized the non-speaking nature of the impugned order and asserted that a lack of proper reasoning does not stand up to judicial scrutiny, a principle supported by precedent from the apex court.

The court’s intervention has set a precedent for the Income Tax Department to adhere to procedural rigour and provide adequate reasoning in its orders, especially when deviating from requests made by taxpayers.

The order has been remanded back to the respondent for a fresh, expedited determination in accordance with the law. This decision underscores the judiciary’s role in ensuring that statutory bodies do not overstep their bounds and maintain transparency and fairness in their administrative actions.

Date of Decision: 07.11.2023

SHREYASH RETAIL PRIVATE LTD VS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX  TDS CIRCLE

Latest Legal News