MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Alleged Acid Attack Case: Inherent Improbability of Allegations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed FIR No.264/2017, pertaining to an alleged acid attack incident dating back to 2017. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal delivered the judgment on November 8, 2023, highlighting the “inherent improbability” of the allegations against the petitioner.

The case involved accusations against the petitioner of throwing acid on the respondent no.2, leading to registration of the FIR under Sections 326-B/506 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Shalimar Bagh. However, upon close scrutiny of the medical and police records, which failed to show any external injuries on the respondent or signs of acid, the court found substantial inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case.

Justice Bansal observed, “The judicial conscience of this Court is satisfied that the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner are a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer and ought to be quashed.” This statement was pivotal in the decision to terminate the proceedings, underscoring the court’s stance on preventing the misuse of legal processes.

The court also addressed the underlying property dispute between the parties, acknowledging it as the root cause behind the mala fide initiation of the proceedings. The judgment emphasized the responsible use of the judicial system and the importance of ensuring that criminal charges are not leveraged as tools in personal vendettas.

Advocates representing both sides presented their arguments, but the court, guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court, ultimately decided in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the charges against her.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the High Court’s authority under Section 482 of the CrPC to intervene in cases where legal processes are being abused, thereby upholding the principles of justice. The legal fraternity views this judgment as a reinforcement of the judicial system’s role in safeguarding individuals against unfounded criminal accusations.

Date of Decision: 08 November 2023

RASHMEE KANSAL VS THE STATE AND ANR.

Latest Legal News