Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Alleged Acid Attack Case: Inherent Improbability of Allegations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed FIR No.264/2017, pertaining to an alleged acid attack incident dating back to 2017. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Bansal delivered the judgment on November 8, 2023, highlighting the “inherent improbability” of the allegations against the petitioner.

The case involved accusations against the petitioner of throwing acid on the respondent no.2, leading to registration of the FIR under Sections 326-B/506 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Shalimar Bagh. However, upon close scrutiny of the medical and police records, which failed to show any external injuries on the respondent or signs of acid, the court found substantial inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case.

Justice Bansal observed, “The judicial conscience of this Court is satisfied that the criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioner are a misuse of the process of the Court and an unnecessary burden on the State exchequer and ought to be quashed.” This statement was pivotal in the decision to terminate the proceedings, underscoring the court’s stance on preventing the misuse of legal processes.

The court also addressed the underlying property dispute between the parties, acknowledging it as the root cause behind the mala fide initiation of the proceedings. The judgment emphasized the responsible use of the judicial system and the importance of ensuring that criminal charges are not leveraged as tools in personal vendettas.

Advocates representing both sides presented their arguments, but the court, guided by precedents set by the Supreme Court, ultimately decided in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the charges against her.

This ruling serves as a reminder of the High Court’s authority under Section 482 of the CrPC to intervene in cases where legal processes are being abused, thereby upholding the principles of justice. The legal fraternity views this judgment as a reinforcement of the judicial system’s role in safeguarding individuals against unfounded criminal accusations.

Date of Decision: 08 November 2023

RASHMEE KANSAL VS THE STATE AND ANR.

Latest Legal News