MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Quashes DDA Demolition Notice for Mehrauli Park, Asserts: Procedural Fairness Must Stand Intact

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed a demolition notice issued by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), which targeted unauthorized constructions in the Mehrauli Archaeological Park. The Court underscored the importance of procedural fairness, stating, “Principles of natural justice demand that those whose interests are adversely affected by an administrative action, must be given a chance to be heard.”

The bench, comprising the Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, delivered the judgment on 8th November 2023, in response to the pleas of several petitioners claiming ownership of properties within the park’s khasra No. 1151/3 of Village Mehrauli. The petitioners had challenged the DDA’s demolition order, arguing that it was unfairly singling out their properties without following due legal process.

The Court noted the complexities involved in the demarcation of land, which has been a subject of contention between the petitioners and the DDA. “The core of Petitioners’ grievances is the actual location of their properties, as depicted on the maps utilized by the authorities to carry out the demarcation,” Justice Narula observed. In view of this, the Court has directed the DDA to reissue the demolition notice, ensuring that all affected parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case, as mandated by the DDA Act.

The decision has significant implications for the ongoing efforts to conserve the heritage zone of Mehrauli. While the Court recognized the DDA’s responsibility to maintain the area, it emphasized that conservation efforts must not override the necessity of following the due process of law. The Court’s decision reaffirms the right of individuals to be heard before being deprived of their property, setting a precedent for procedural fairness in administrative actions.

The High Court has clarified that it has not examined the merits of the demarcation report dated 21st December 2021 and has left all rights and contentions of the parties open. This move is seen as a way to ensure that the intricate disputes over boundary delineations are resolved by competent authorities or civil courts, which are better equipped to handle such technical matters.

The ruling has been welcomed by the petitioners’ advocates as a triumph of justice and fair play. The DDA is expected to respond to the Court’s directions by initiating a new process that adheres strictly to the legal procedures established for such actions.

Date of Decision: 08 November, 2023

DARGHA NAJEEBUDDIN FIRDOUSI VS  DELHI DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR 

Latest Legal News