Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Delhi High Court Quashes DDA Demolition Notice for Mehrauli Park, Asserts: Procedural Fairness Must Stand Intact

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has quashed a demolition notice issued by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), which targeted unauthorized constructions in the Mehrauli Archaeological Park. The Court underscored the importance of procedural fairness, stating, “Principles of natural justice demand that those whose interests are adversely affected by an administrative action, must be given a chance to be heard.”

The bench, comprising the Hon’ble Chief Justice and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula, delivered the judgment on 8th November 2023, in response to the pleas of several petitioners claiming ownership of properties within the park’s khasra No. 1151/3 of Village Mehrauli. The petitioners had challenged the DDA’s demolition order, arguing that it was unfairly singling out their properties without following due legal process.

The Court noted the complexities involved in the demarcation of land, which has been a subject of contention between the petitioners and the DDA. “The core of Petitioners’ grievances is the actual location of their properties, as depicted on the maps utilized by the authorities to carry out the demarcation,” Justice Narula observed. In view of this, the Court has directed the DDA to reissue the demolition notice, ensuring that all affected parties are given a fair opportunity to present their case, as mandated by the DDA Act.

The decision has significant implications for the ongoing efforts to conserve the heritage zone of Mehrauli. While the Court recognized the DDA’s responsibility to maintain the area, it emphasized that conservation efforts must not override the necessity of following the due process of law. The Court’s decision reaffirms the right of individuals to be heard before being deprived of their property, setting a precedent for procedural fairness in administrative actions.

The High Court has clarified that it has not examined the merits of the demarcation report dated 21st December 2021 and has left all rights and contentions of the parties open. This move is seen as a way to ensure that the intricate disputes over boundary delineations are resolved by competent authorities or civil courts, which are better equipped to handle such technical matters.

The ruling has been welcomed by the petitioners’ advocates as a triumph of justice and fair play. The DDA is expected to respond to the Court’s directions by initiating a new process that adheres strictly to the legal procedures established for such actions.

Date of Decision: 08 November, 2023

DARGHA NAJEEBUDDIN FIRDOUSI VS  DELHI DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR 

Latest Legal News