Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

Delhi High Court Orders Grant of Customs Brokers License, Citing "Principle of Equal Treatment"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, in its judgment on Writ Petition (Civil) 2143/2023, directed the Directorate General of Performance Management and others to issue a Customs Brokers License to Mr. Keshav Kumar Thakur, the petitioner. The court, led by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, emphasized the "principle of equal treatment" and extended the benefits of a previous judgment to Mr. Thakur without requiring him to approach the court again.

The case revolved around the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations – 2013 and the criteria for qualifying the written and oral examinations. Mr. Thakur had cleared the written examination with an impressive score of 61.5 marks but initially failed to pass the oral examination. However, he succeeded in his second attempt, securing 51 marks.

The pivotal contention in the case arose when the respondents refused to grant Customs Brokers Licenses to candidates scoring less than 60 marks in the oral examination, alleging a mid-way change in rules. Several other candidates, facing a similar predicament, had previously approached the court through writ petitions (W.P.(C) 12777/2019, W.P.(C) 12865/2019 & W.P.(C) 13132/2019). The court had already allowed these petitions, directing the respondents to issue licenses to the petitioners therein based on the "principle of equal treatment."

"When a citizen aggrieved by the action of a government department has approached the Court and obtained a declaration of law in his favour, others, in like circumstances, should be able to rely on the sense of responsibility of the department concerned and to expect that they will be given the benefit of this declaration without the need to take their grievances to court... Applying this principle to the present case, it was the duty of the Respondents to extend the benefit of the Order dated 18.02.2022 to the Petitioner herein without expecting that every candidate who has secured more than 50 marks in the oral examination must run to this Court to obtain a declaration in their favour."

In light of this principle, the court allowed Mr. Thakur's writ petition and directed the respondents to issue him the Customs Brokers License, taking into account the previous court order that had attained finality.

Date of Decision: 24th July, 2023

Keshav Kumar Thakur vs Directorate General Of Performance Management & Ors     

Latest Legal News