Granting Bail Does Not Shield Foreign Nationals from Executive Action on Visa Violations: Delhi High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Misused to Resolve Substantive Disputes or Replace Execution Mechanisms: P&H High Court Eviction Proceedings Must Follow Principles of Natural Justice: Telangana High Court Quashes Eviction Order under Senior Citizens Act Limitation Law | Sufficient Cause Cannot Be Liberally Interpreted If Negligence or Inaction Is Apparent: Gujarat High Court Mere Pendency of Lease Renewal Requests Does Not Constitute Bona Fide Dispute: Calcutta High Court Upholds Eviction Proceedings Under Public Premises Act CGST | Declaratory Nature of Safari Retreats Ruling Mandates Reassessment of Input Tax Credit Claims: Kerala High Court Changing Rules of the Game Mid-Way Violates Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution: Rajasthan High Court Disapproval of a Relationship Does Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide Without Direct Instigation or Mens Rea: Supreme Court Limitation Period Under Section 166(3) of the Motor Vehicle Act Cannot Defeat Victim’s Right to Compensation: Gujarat High Court Maintenance To Wife Cannot Be a Precondition for Bail: Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Section 438 CrPC Court Cannot Rewrite Contract When Vendor Lacks Ownership of the Property: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Royalty Can Be Levied on Minor Minerals Like Brick Earth, Irrespective of Land Ownership: Supreme Court Bail in Heinous Crimes Must Be Granted with Adequate Reasons and Judicial Scrutiny: Supreme Court Judicial Review in Disciplinary Cases Is Limited to Fairness, Not Reappreciation of Evidence: Supreme Court

Delhi High Court Grants Regular Bail to Accused in Multi-Crore Fraud Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Delhi High Court has granted regular bail to the accused in a high-profile fraud case involving allegations of misappropriation of funds amounting to approximately Rs. 8.5 crores. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee, has provided a respite to the applicant, who had filed a bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The accused, Mr. Mukesh Bhardwaj, had been arrested in connection with FIR No. 136/2012 registered at the Economic Offences Wing (EOW) of the Delhi Police. While the applicant was not named in the FIR, he was apprehended based on his association with the financial company M/s. B.P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. And M/s. Money Bhandar.

Justice Banerjee, in his judgment, observed, “Keeping the applicant behind bars for the prolonged period of trial would serve no purpose, especially in view of the fact that he is yet to be proven guilty.” The court further noted that the alleged nexus between M/s. Money Bhandar and M/s. B.P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. Had not been firmly established and that the trial in the matter was expected to be lengthy.

The judgment took into account the applicant’s clean record during his time in jail and emphasized that there was no occasion for him to languish behind bars while the trial was ongoing. The court, therefore, deemed it fit to grant regular bail to Mr. Mukesh Bhardwaj.

“While being inside the jail, the applicant has maintained a clean and unblemished record. Therefore, his continued detention is unnecessary, as the guilt has not been proven,” Justice Banerjee stated in the judgment. The court imposed certain conditions on the bail, including a personal bond of Rs. 1,50,000 and the submission of a passport (if possessed) to the Investigating Officer.

It is important to note that the observations made by the court are prima facie and do not reflect the final decision on the merits of the case. The judgment is expected to provide significant relief to the accused, whose trial is likely to take a substantial amount of time.

The legal fraternity has been closely following this case, given the magnitude of the alleged fraud and the complexities surrounding the involvement of multiple entities. The judgment sets a precedent for considering bail applications in similar cases where the accused’s role is not clearly established.

This judgment also serves as a reminder of the importance of due process and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in the Indian legal system.

Date of Decision: July 17, 2023

MUKESH BHARDWAJ vs   THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI   

Similar News