Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Delhi High Court Grants Permission for Property Repairs Post-MCD Demolition: A Move Towards Amicable Resolution and Regularisation

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment that clarifies the rights of property owners to undertake repairs, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has set a precedent in the case of Lakhbir Singh (since deceased) & Ors. Versus Kawaljeet Singh Bhatia & Anr. The court decisively ruled in favor of allowing property owners to conduct self-funded repairs on their properties, especially in cases where damage is incurred due to actions by municipal bodies.

The judgment, pronounced on 24th November 2023, addresses a dispute where the petitioner’s property was damaged due to demolition activities carried out by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on an adjacent property. The petitioner approached the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India after their application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to repair their property, was dismissed by the Trial Court.

In her landmark observation, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora noted, “There is no legal impediment in the Petitioner carrying out the repairs proposed by them in this petition.” This statement underlines the court’s stance on the fundamental right of property owners to maintain and repair their premises, especially in scenarios where external factors have caused damage.

The case also highlighted the issue of unauthorized constructions, with the court confirming that no current proceedings were pending against the petitioner’s property for such violations. Moreover, the judgment laid out a clear path for both the petitioner and the respondent to apply for regularization of any unauthorized constructions under the existing policy.

The court’s decision, setting aside the previous order of the Trial Court, has been widely welcomed by legal experts and property owners alike. It not only reinforces the rights of individuals to maintain their properties but also delineates the responsibilities and processes involved in such circumstances.

In conclusion, this ruling by the High Court of Delhi serves as a guiding principle for similar cases, ensuring that property owners are not unduly hindered from undertaking necessary repairs and maintenance of their properties.

Date of Decision: 24th November 2023

LAKHBIR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ORS. VS KAWALJEET SINGH BHATIA & ANR

Latest Legal News