MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: AZIWOK vs. AZIWAKE

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited, against Smart Laboratories Pvt Ltd. The Court’s decision, pronounced on November 16, 2023, in case number CS(COMM) 744/2023, addresses the contentious issue of phonetic similarity between two pharmaceutical products: ‘AZIWOK’ and ‘AZIWAKE’.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, presiding over the case, underscored the importance of distinctiveness in pharmaceutical trademarks due to potential consumer confusion. “The existence, or otherwise, of confusion is required to be assessed at the ‘initial interest’ stage,” Justice Shankar observed, highlighting the risks associated with confusion in medicinal products.

The plaintiff, Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited, holds the registered trademark ‘AZIWOK’, used for azithromycin pharmaceutical products. The defendant, Smart Laboratories Pvt Ltd, was alleged to have infringed upon this trademark with their product named ‘AZIWAKE’. The Court’s analysis leaned heavily on the phonetic similarity of the two marks, considering the potential for confusion among consumers, especially given the critical nature of pharmaceutical products.

Applying the ‘Pianotist’ test, Justice Shankar noted, “To the ear of the consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, it is clear that the words ‘AZIWOK’ and ‘AZIWAKE’ are phonetically deceptively similar.” This observation formed a crucial part of the rationale for granting the injunction.

In balancing the equities, the Court found that the balance of convenience and irreparable harm favored the plaintiff. “Continuing infringement, by the defendant, of the plaintiff’s mark, is likely to dilute its brand value,” Justice Shankar stated, highlighting the inadequate nature of monetary compensation in such cases.

However, the Court allowed the defendant to sell their existing stock of ‘AZIWAKE’ already in the market, subject to specific compliance requirements.

Date of Decision: 16 November 2023

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED VS  SMART LABORATORIES PVT LTD

 

Latest Legal News