Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: AZIWOK vs. AZIWAKE

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling on trademark infringement, the Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction in favor of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited, against Smart Laboratories Pvt Ltd. The Court’s decision, pronounced on November 16, 2023, in case number CS(COMM) 744/2023, addresses the contentious issue of phonetic similarity between two pharmaceutical products: ‘AZIWOK’ and ‘AZIWAKE’.

Hon’ble Mr. Justice C. Hari Shankar, presiding over the case, underscored the importance of distinctiveness in pharmaceutical trademarks due to potential consumer confusion. “The existence, or otherwise, of confusion is required to be assessed at the ‘initial interest’ stage,” Justice Shankar observed, highlighting the risks associated with confusion in medicinal products.

The plaintiff, Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited, holds the registered trademark ‘AZIWOK’, used for azithromycin pharmaceutical products. The defendant, Smart Laboratories Pvt Ltd, was alleged to have infringed upon this trademark with their product named ‘AZIWAKE’. The Court’s analysis leaned heavily on the phonetic similarity of the two marks, considering the potential for confusion among consumers, especially given the critical nature of pharmaceutical products.

Applying the ‘Pianotist’ test, Justice Shankar noted, “To the ear of the consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, it is clear that the words ‘AZIWOK’ and ‘AZIWAKE’ are phonetically deceptively similar.” This observation formed a crucial part of the rationale for granting the injunction.

In balancing the equities, the Court found that the balance of convenience and irreparable harm favored the plaintiff. “Continuing infringement, by the defendant, of the plaintiff’s mark, is likely to dilute its brand value,” Justice Shankar stated, highlighting the inadequate nature of monetary compensation in such cases.

However, the Court allowed the defendant to sell their existing stock of ‘AZIWAKE’ already in the market, subject to specific compliance requirements.

Date of Decision: 16 November 2023

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED VS  SMART LABORATORIES PVT LTD

 

Latest Legal News