Summary Security Force Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Civil Offences Beyond Simple Hurt And Theft: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Vague Allegations Cannot Dissolve a Sacred Marital Relationship: Karnataka High Court Upholds Dismissal of Divorce Petition Daughters Entitled to Coparcenary Rights in Ancestral Property under Hindu Succession Act, 2005 Amendment: Madras High Court Divorce | False Allegations of Domestic Violence and Paternity Questions Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Hostile Witness Testimony Admissible if Corroborated by Independent Evidence: Punjab and Haryana High Court Fraud Must Be Specifically Pleaded and Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt to Invalidate Registered Documents: Andhra Pradesh High Court Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Rash Driving Conviction But Grants Probation to First-Time Offender Bus Driver Orissa High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband Convicted of Wife's Murder Merit Cannot Be Sacrificed for Procedural Technicalities in NEET UG Admissions: Rajasthan High Court Patna High Court Upholds Partition Decrees: Unregistered Partition Deed Inadmissible, Fails to Prove Prior Partition - Joint Hindu Family Property Presumed Undivided: Patna High Court Section 195(1)(b) CrPC | Judicial Integrity Cannot Be Undermined: Supreme Court Restores Evidence Tampering Case In a NDPS Case Readiness and Willingness, Not Time, Decide Equity in Sale Agreements: Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance Prolonged Detention Violates Fundamental Rights Under Article 21: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Money Laundering Case DV ACT | Economic Abuse Includes Alienation of Assets, Necessitating Protection Orders: Allahabad High Court Illegal Structures to Face Demolition: Bombay HC Directs Strict Action Against Unauthorized Constructions Justice Must Extend to the Last Person Behind Bars: Supreme Court Pushes for Full Implementation of BNSS Section 479 to Relieve Undertrial Prisoners Efficiency Over Central Oversight: Supreme Court Asserts Need for Localized SIT in Chennai Case Partition, Not Injunction, Is Remedy for Joint Property Disputes: P&H High Court Dismisses Plea Subsequent Purchaser Can Question Plaintiff’s Intent: MP High Court Clarifies Specific Relief Act Trademark Pirates Face Legal Wrath: Delhi HC Enforces Radio Mirchi’s IP Rights Swiftly Madras High Court Upholds Extended Adjudication Period Under Customs Act Amid Allegations of Systemic Lapses Disputes Over Religious Office Will Be Consolidated for Efficient Adjudication, Holds Karnataka High Court Motive Alone, Without Corroborative Evidence, Insufficient for Conviction : High Court Acquits Accused in 1993 Murder Case Himachal Pradesh HC Criticizes State for Delays: Orders Timely Action on Employee Grievances Calls for Pragmatic Approach to Desertion and Cruelty in Divorce Cases: Calcutta High Court Orders Fresh Trial Juvenile Tried as Adult: Bombay High Court Validates JJB Decision, Modifies Sentence to 7 Years Retrospective Application of Amended Rules for Redeployment Declared Invalid: Orissa High Court NDPS Act Leaves No Room for Leniency: HC Requires Substantial Proof of Innocence for Bail No Protection Without Performance: MP High Court Denies Relief Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail to Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds, Cites Inability of Jail to Provide Adequate Care

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Health is paramount, specialized dietary needs cannot be ignored: High Court

In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted interim bail to Amit Katyal, who is facing charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), on medical grounds. Justice Dharmesh Sharma presided over the matter, emphasizing the inadequacy of jail facilities to cater to Katyal’s post-bariatric surgery dietary and medical requirements. The interim bail has been granted for six weeks, subject to stringent conditions.

Amit Katyal, suffering from complications following a bariatric sleeve gastrectomy performed on April 9, 2024, petitioned for interim bail under Section 45 of the PMLA read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Katyal cited multiple health issues, including coronary artery disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and syncope, exacerbated by inadequate dietary provisions in jail. The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) opposed the bail, arguing that the jail could manage Katyal’s medical needs and raised concerns about his potential misuse of bail.

The court’s decision leaned heavily on the medical reports provided by the jail and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The Medical Status Report from Tihar Jail highlighted Katyal’s severe health issues and the necessity for a specific diet critical for his recovery. The AIIMS Medical Board confirmed the essential nature of this specialized diet and the challenges in meeting these dietary requirements within the jail premises.

Justice Sharma noted, “The dietary requirements of the applicant are such that they cannot be provided in the jail premises. Considering that the petitioner has undergone surgery on 09.04.2024, post Bariatric Surgery, he needs to be given a proper diet in order to attain adequate physical, mental, and psychological well-being for at least a period of 3 to 4 months.”

The judgment carefully considered the legal principles surrounding the granting of bail on medical grounds. Justice Sharma cited various precedents, emphasizing that interim bail on medical grounds is warranted when specialized treatment necessary for the petitioner’s health cannot be adequately provided within the jail. The court balanced Katyal’s health rights against the need to prevent interference with the ongoing investigation.

“The health of the petitioner has to be given primacy, and it is his fundamental right to be given adequate and effective treatment whilst in jail,” Justice Sharma remarked, referencing the case law to support this stance.

Justice Sharma underscored the importance of the medical evidence, stating, “The provision of a strict diet is very critical and essential for the adequate recovery of the petitioner since the surgery has led to the removal of 75% of the stomach. Until proper diet is given, recovery is unlikely to happen.”

The Delhi High Court’s decision to grant interim bail to Amit Katyal for six weeks underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring humane treatment of detainees, particularly when specialized medical care is required. The judgment sets a significant precedent for future cases involving medical bail, highlighting the balance between an individual’s health rights and the integrity of the judicial process.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2024

Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India

Similar News