Section 32 Arbitration Act | Termination for Non-Payment of Fees Ends Arbitrator’s Mandate; Remedy Lies in Section 14(2): Supreme Court False Allegations of Dowry and Bigamy Amount to Mental Cruelty: Madras High Court Upholds Divorce Plaintiff Must Prove Her Own Title Before Seeking Demolition Of Defendant’s Pre-existing House: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mismatch Between Bullet and Recovered Gun Fatal to Prosecution: Calcutta High Court Acquits Man Convicted for Murder Where the Conduct of the Sole Eye-Witness Appears Unnatural and No Independent Witness Is Examined, Conviction Cannot Stand: Allahabad High Court Fraudulent Sale of Vehicle During Hire Purchase Renders Agreement Void: Gauhati High Court Upholds Decree for Refund of ₹4.90 Lakhs Unsigned Written Statement Can’t Silence a Defendant: Hyper-Technical Objections Must Yield to Substantive Justice: Delhi High Court Default Bail | No Accused, No Extension: Delhi High Court Rules Custody Extension Without Notice as Gross Illegality Under Article 21 Gratuity Can Be Withheld Post-Retirement for Proven Negligence Under Service Rules – Payment of Gratuity Act Does Not Override CDA Rules: Calcutta High Court Cognizance Is of the Offence, Not the Offender: Madras High Court Rejects Challenge to ED’s Supplementary Complaint in PMLA Case Acquittal in Rajasthan No Bar to Trial in Madhya Pradesh: MP High Court Rejects Double Jeopardy Plea in Antiquities Theft Case 20% Deposit Isn’t Automatic in Cheque Bounce Appeals: Right to Appeal Can’t Be Priced Out: Punjab & Haryana High Court Checks Mechanical Use of Section 148 NI Act A Child Is Not a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets New Benchmark in Compensation for Minors’ Deaths 90 Days Is Not Sacrosanct – Courts Can Permit Reply to Counter-Claim Even Beyond Prescribed Time in Interest of Justice: Punjab & Haryana High Court Magistrate Can Proceed Only for Offences Committed in India Until Sanction Is Obtained for Acts Outside India: Orissa High Court on International Financial Fraud Award Is Vitiated by Non-Consideration of Material Evidence: Orissa High Court Sets Aside Industrial Tribunal’s Wage Award in IMFA Case POCSO | Absence of Child's Name in Birth Certificate Not Fatal: Kerala High Court No One Has the Right to Impute Illicit Motives to Judges in the Name of Free Speech: Karnataka High Court Jails Man for Criminal Contempt DV Complaint Cannot Be Quashed at Threshold Under Article 227: Madras High Court Refuses to Interfere, Directs Accused to Seek Remedy Before Magistrate Recovery Wasn't From Accused's Exclusive Knowledge — Cylinder Already Marked in Site Plan Before Arrest: Allahabad High Court Acquits Man in Murder Case State Can’t Block SARFAESI Sale by Late Revenue Entries: Secured Creditor’s Charge Prevails Over Tax Dues: Punjab & Haryana High Court Slams Sub-Registrar’s Refusal Providing SIM Card Without Knowledge of Its Criminal Use Does Not Imply Criminal Conspiracy: P&H High Court Grants Bail in UAPA & Murder Case Importer Who Accepts Enhanced Valuation Cannot Later Contest Confiscation and Penalty for Undervaluation: Madras High Court Upholds Strict Liability under Customs Act "Allegations Are Not Proof: Madras High Court Refuses Divorce Without Substantiated Cruelty or Desertion" When FIR Is Filed After Consulting Political Leaders, the Possibility of Coloured Version Cannot Be Ruled Out: Kerala High Court Mere Allegations of Antecedents Without Conviction Can't Defeat Right to Anticipatory Bail: Kerala High Court Section 106 Of Evidence Act Cannot Be Invoked In Vacuum – Prosecution Must First Lay Foundational Facts: Karnataka High Court Acquits Wife And Co-Accused In Husband’s Murder Case Parity Cannot Be Claimed When Roles Are Different: Karnataka High Court Refuses Bail to Youth Accused of Brutal Killing Injured Wife Would Not Falsely Implicate Her Husband: Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction in Domestic Stabbing Case Disputed Bids, Missing Evidence and No Prejudice: Delhi High Court Refuses to Intervene in Tender Challenge under Article 226 Setting Fire to House Where Only Minors Were Present is a Heinous Offence – No Quashing Merely Because Parties Settled: Calcutta High Court No Exclusive Possession Means Licence, Not Lease: Calcutta High Court Rules City Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Evict Licensees Defendant's Own Family Attested the Sale Agreement – Yet She Called It Nominal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Specific Performance Renewal Not Automatic, No Evidence Of Notice Or Mutual Agreement: AP High Court Dismisses Indian Oil’s Appeal Against Eviction

Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail to Amit Katyal on Medical Grounds, Cites Inability of Jail to Provide Adequate Care

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Health is paramount, specialized dietary needs cannot be ignored: High Court

In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has granted interim bail to Amit Katyal, who is facing charges under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), on medical grounds. Justice Dharmesh Sharma presided over the matter, emphasizing the inadequacy of jail facilities to cater to Katyal’s post-bariatric surgery dietary and medical requirements. The interim bail has been granted for six weeks, subject to stringent conditions.

Amit Katyal, suffering from complications following a bariatric sleeve gastrectomy performed on April 9, 2024, petitioned for interim bail under Section 45 of the PMLA read with Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Katyal cited multiple health issues, including coronary artery disease, obstructive sleep apnea, diabetes, and syncope, exacerbated by inadequate dietary provisions in jail. The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) opposed the bail, arguing that the jail could manage Katyal’s medical needs and raised concerns about his potential misuse of bail.

The court’s decision leaned heavily on the medical reports provided by the jail and the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS). The Medical Status Report from Tihar Jail highlighted Katyal’s severe health issues and the necessity for a specific diet critical for his recovery. The AIIMS Medical Board confirmed the essential nature of this specialized diet and the challenges in meeting these dietary requirements within the jail premises.

Justice Sharma noted, “The dietary requirements of the applicant are such that they cannot be provided in the jail premises. Considering that the petitioner has undergone surgery on 09.04.2024, post Bariatric Surgery, he needs to be given a proper diet in order to attain adequate physical, mental, and psychological well-being for at least a period of 3 to 4 months.”

The judgment carefully considered the legal principles surrounding the granting of bail on medical grounds. Justice Sharma cited various precedents, emphasizing that interim bail on medical grounds is warranted when specialized treatment necessary for the petitioner’s health cannot be adequately provided within the jail. The court balanced Katyal’s health rights against the need to prevent interference with the ongoing investigation.

“The health of the petitioner has to be given primacy, and it is his fundamental right to be given adequate and effective treatment whilst in jail,” Justice Sharma remarked, referencing the case law to support this stance.

Justice Sharma underscored the importance of the medical evidence, stating, “The provision of a strict diet is very critical and essential for the adequate recovery of the petitioner since the surgery has led to the removal of 75% of the stomach. Until proper diet is given, recovery is unlikely to happen.”

The Delhi High Court’s decision to grant interim bail to Amit Katyal for six weeks underscores the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring humane treatment of detainees, particularly when specialized medical care is required. The judgment sets a significant precedent for future cases involving medical bail, highlighting the balance between an individual’s health rights and the integrity of the judicial process.

Date of Decision: June 26, 2024

Amit Katyal v. Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India

Latest Legal News