Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Delhi High Court Grants Divorce - Prolonged Separation and Mutual Cruelty”

06 September 2024 5:54 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, in a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce on the grounds of prolonged separation and mutual cruelty in the case of Rashmi Sharma vs. Deepak Sharma. The judgment, pronounced on October 19, 2023, sets a precedent for cases where matrimonial relationships have irretrievably broken down.

The Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna presided over the case. The divorce was granted under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, following a petition by the husband, Deepak Sharma, seeking the dissolution of his marriage to Rashmi Sharma.

The judgment noted that the couple had been living separately for more than a decade since 2012, and there was no possibility of reconciliation. It observed that “long separation and deprivation of conjugal relationship, with almost an impossible chance of reconciliation, is an extreme kind of cruelty.”

The Court also considered the conduct of both parties during their marriage. It took note of various incidents claimed by the husband, including allegations of cruelty and abusive behavior by the wife. However, the Court found that the appellant-wife had not been able to justify the grounds on which these complaints were made.

Furthermore, the judgment addressed an application filed by the wife seeking permanent maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995, for the child born from their wedlock. The Court granted the appellant liberty to seek relief under the appropriate provisions of the law.

In a society where matrimonial disputes often become complex and emotionally charged, this judgment emphasizes the importance of evaluating each case on its peculiar facts and circumstances. It underscores the significance of mutual trust, compatibility, and congeniality in a marriage, and the consequences of unfounded allegations and prolonged separation.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

RASHMI SHARMA   vs DEEPAK SHARMA 

Latest Legal News