Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Divorce - Prolonged Separation and Mutual Cruelty”

06 September 2024 5:54 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, in a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce on the grounds of prolonged separation and mutual cruelty in the case of Rashmi Sharma vs. Deepak Sharma. The judgment, pronounced on October 19, 2023, sets a precedent for cases where matrimonial relationships have irretrievably broken down.

The Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna presided over the case. The divorce was granted under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, following a petition by the husband, Deepak Sharma, seeking the dissolution of his marriage to Rashmi Sharma.

The judgment noted that the couple had been living separately for more than a decade since 2012, and there was no possibility of reconciliation. It observed that “long separation and deprivation of conjugal relationship, with almost an impossible chance of reconciliation, is an extreme kind of cruelty.”

The Court also considered the conduct of both parties during their marriage. It took note of various incidents claimed by the husband, including allegations of cruelty and abusive behavior by the wife. However, the Court found that the appellant-wife had not been able to justify the grounds on which these complaints were made.

Furthermore, the judgment addressed an application filed by the wife seeking permanent maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995, for the child born from their wedlock. The Court granted the appellant liberty to seek relief under the appropriate provisions of the law.

In a society where matrimonial disputes often become complex and emotionally charged, this judgment emphasizes the importance of evaluating each case on its peculiar facts and circumstances. It underscores the significance of mutual trust, compatibility, and congeniality in a marriage, and the consequences of unfounded allegations and prolonged separation.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

RASHMI SHARMA   vs DEEPAK SHARMA 

Latest Legal News