Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Divorce - Prolonged Separation and Mutual Cruelty”

06 September 2024 5:54 AM

By: Admin


On 19 October 2023, in a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce on the grounds of prolonged separation and mutual cruelty in the case of Rashmi Sharma vs. Deepak Sharma. The judgment, pronounced on October 19, 2023, sets a precedent for cases where matrimonial relationships have irretrievably broken down.

The Hon’ble Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna presided over the case. The divorce was granted under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, following a petition by the husband, Deepak Sharma, seeking the dissolution of his marriage to Rashmi Sharma.

The judgment noted that the couple had been living separately for more than a decade since 2012, and there was no possibility of reconciliation. It observed that “long separation and deprivation of conjugal relationship, with almost an impossible chance of reconciliation, is an extreme kind of cruelty.”

The Court also considered the conduct of both parties during their marriage. It took note of various incidents claimed by the husband, including allegations of cruelty and abusive behavior by the wife. However, the Court found that the appellant-wife had not been able to justify the grounds on which these complaints were made.

Furthermore, the judgment addressed an application filed by the wife seeking permanent maintenance under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1995, for the child born from their wedlock. The Court granted the appellant liberty to seek relief under the appropriate provisions of the law.

In a society where matrimonial disputes often become complex and emotionally charged, this judgment emphasizes the importance of evaluating each case on its peculiar facts and circumstances. It underscores the significance of mutual trust, compatibility, and congeniality in a marriage, and the consequences of unfounded allegations and prolonged separation.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

RASHMI SHARMA   vs DEEPAK SHARMA 

Latest Legal News