Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Grants Bail in NDPS Act Case After Over 4 Years in Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma, granted bail to the petitioner, Gaurav Mendiratta, in a case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The decision, delivered on August 17, 2023, comes after the petitioner spent over four years in judicial custody.

The petitioner had sought regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in relation to Case No. SC/213/19 arising from NDPS Act case. The case involved the recovery of a commercial quantity of contraband substances. The prosecution had relied on disclosure statements under Section 67 of the NDPS Act to establish the petitioner’s involvement.

Hon’ble Justice Amit Sharma emphasized the importance of a timely trial and the potential violation of fundamental rights due to prolonged incarceration. “Prolonged incarceration generally militates against the most precious fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution,” observed the Court.

The Court also noted the precedence set by the Supreme Court, which underscored that if a timely trial is not possible, courts are obligated to release undertrials on bail. This approach ensures the balance between legislative policy and constitutional rights.

The petitioner’s counsel had highlighted that out of the 20 witnesses cited by the prosecution, only six had been examined, and the trial was expected to take a considerable amount of time. The Court took into consideration the applicant’s prolonged custody period, the likelihood of a lengthy trial, and the importance of safeguarding personal liberty.

While granting bail, the Court imposed specific conditions, including a personal bond and sureties, maintaining operational mobile numbers, not tampering with evidence or witnesses, and notifying any change of address to the Investigating Officer. The judgment emphasized that the release on bail was due to the substantial period of custody and the importance of a fair trial.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023   

GAURAV MENDIRATTA  vs NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU        

Latest Legal News