Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Delhi High Court Grants Bail in 2015 Hauz Khas Murder Case Citing Weak Prosecution and Long Incarceration

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to Vikas Balguer @ Shammi and Ashish Balguer, implicated in the 2015 Hauz Khas murder case. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vikas Mahajan, while pronouncing the judgment, observed that the weak prosecution case, coupled with the long incarceration of the accused, tilted the balance in favor of granting bail.

The Court considered the fundamental principle of presumption of innocence at the pre-conviction stage and the purpose of custody, which is to ensure the accused’s availability during the trial. The Court opined that an indefinite period of custody, especially in the face of an uncertain trial conclusion, might lead to grave injustice if the accused are ultimately acquitted.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Rohit Bansal about a fight that occurred on the intervening night of October 21-22, 2015, at Shanghai-30 Bar and Restaurant in Hauz Khas, leading to the death of Rupesh. The FIR registered included charges under Sections 302/308/201/212/34 IPC. The petitioners sought regular bail after being in custody for over 7 years and 8 months.

The Court meticulously analyzed the testimonies of key eyewitnesses, noting significant inconsistencies and contradictions in their statements. The key witnesses, including PW2 Rohit Bansal, PW3 Sagar Sharma, and PW4 Jitender Sharma, either partially or wholly resiled from their earlier statements. Additionally, the Court noted the clean antecedents of petitioner Ashish Balguer and the acquittal of Vikas Balguer @ Shammi in another case.

Granting bail, the Court directed the petitioners to furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two sureties of the like amount. The Court imposed conditions including appearance before the Court as required, maintaining working mobile numbers, and refraining from any criminal activity or contact with witnesses/complainants.

The Court clarified that its observations were solely for considering the bail application and should not influence the trial’s merits.

Date of Decision: 15.02.2024

VIKAS BALGUER @ SHAMMI VS GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

Latest Legal News