Jammu & Kashmir High Court Directs Construction of Overhead Bridge or Underpass on Ring Road for Safe Passage of Villagers Minor Injuries No Bar for Framing Charges Under Section 307 IPC if Intent to Kill is Present: Supreme Court Prosecution's Case Full of Glaring Doubts:  Supreme Court Overturns Conviction in Abduction and Murder Case Allegations of Dowry Demand in FIR Found Vague and Driven by Civil Property Dispute: Supreme Court Quashes FIR and Chargesheet in Dowry-Cruelty Case Local Police Failed to Perform its Duties: SC Directs New Investigating Officer in Property Dispute Properties Acquired By Gift During Marriage Remain Separate Property Of Spouse Under French Civil Code; Husband Entitled To Half Share Only In Community Assets: Madras High Court Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Against Closure Of Human Trafficking Complaint, Flags Lack Of Bona Fides Access To Justice Cannot Be Denied When Tribunal Is Not Functioning': Calcutta High Court Holds Writ Maintainable Under Article 226 Amid Stalled Conciliation Proceedings Violation Of Natural Justice Overrides Bar On Maintainability Under Section 18 MSMED Act: Orissa High Court Panic In A Train Does Not Mean Self-Destruction: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants ₹8 Lakh Compensation For Passenger's Death In Stampede Section 101 JJ Act | Date Of Knowledge Of Order, Not Mere Knowledge Of Disposal, Commences Limitation Period: Delhi High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Order Declaring Inam Land As Govt Property Without Determining Occupancy Rights Proviso To Section 125(3) CrPC Does Not Limit Enforcement Of Monetary Relief Orders Under Section 20 DV Act: Telangana High Court Regularization Of Deviation Within Permissible Plot Envelope Governed By Uniform Fee Schedule, Arbitrary 5X Penalty Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court Man Who Blackmailed Woman With Her Own Nude Photos To Rape Her Repeatedly Can't Escape Conviction Merely Because His Voice Sample Wasn't Taken: Delhi High Court Arbitration Clause In Sale Agreement Cannot Be Invoked If Subject Matter Involves Third-Party Title Disputes: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Errs In Dismissing Amendment Plea If New Facts Emerge From Written Statement: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Compensation For Own Wrong': Gujarat High Court Rules Tortfeasors & Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Motor Accident Damages Under Section 166 MV Act Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Police And Magistrates Over Illegal Remand Of Juvenile Accused Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) Hindu Marriage Act | Spouse Seeking Divorce On Grounds Of Cruelty And Desertion Must Prove Allegations With Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Cannot Let Land Become Banjar: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Appointment Of Receiver Under BNSS Amidst Pending Civil Title Disputes Section 8 Arbitration Act | Executing Court Must Refer Parties To Arbitration If Dispute Falls Within Scope Of Compromise Decree: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suit For Damages Arising Out Of Tortious Injury Barred By Limitation If Not Filed Within One Year: Punjab & Haryana High Court 72-Hour Gap Not Proximate: Calcutta High Court Quashes Murder Conviction, Holds 'Last Seen' Theory Inapplicable When Time Gap Is Wide Original Owner Cannot Create Trust Over Property Already Sold; Separate Relief For Title Declaration Not Required: Madras High Court

Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Controversial Rape Case: “Relationship Consensual in Nature,” Says Justice Bhatnagar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, granted anticipatory bail to Krishan Gaba, the petitioner in the case FIR No. 260/2023. The case, involving serious allegations under Sections 376, 377, and 504 of the IPC for rape and threats, saw a pivotal turn as the court observed the relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix to be “consensual in nature.”

The decision, pronounced on November 9, 2023, came after a detailed examination of the allegations made by the prosecutrix and the defense put forward by the petitioner. The prosecutrix had accused Gaba of forceful physical relations, threats with nude photographs, and a forced abortion. In contrast, the defense highlighted the prosecutrix’s marital status and previous actions, including a withdrawn complaint and a false divorce decree.

Justice Bhatnagar, in his observation, noted, “The relationship between the petitioner and the complainant/prosecutrix appears to be consensual in nature.” This remark played a crucial role in tilting the scales in favor of the petitioner, leading to the grant of anticipatory bail.

Represented by a team of advocates led by Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, Sr. Adv., the petitioner’s argument focused on the inconsistencies in the complainant’s statements and her marital status. The court also took into consideration the lack of substantial evidence regarding the video-graphed sexual acts and the unsubstantiated threat complaints.

The decision has sparked discussions about the complexities Involved in cases of alleged sexual offenses, especially regarding the interpretation of consent and the impact of personal relationships on legal proceedings.

While granting anticipatory bail, the court also directed the petitioner to join the investigation as required and furnished a personal bond of Rs. 25,000. The court’s decision, however, does not reflect an opinion on the merits of the case, as clarified by Justice Bhatnagar in his order.

This judgment has opened a new chapter in the legal discourse on sexual offenses and consent, bringing to light the nuanced and delicate nature of such cases in the Indian judicial system.

Date of Decision: 09 November 2023

KRISHAN GABA  VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Latest Legal News