Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail in Controversial Rape Case: “Relationship Consensual in Nature,” Says Justice Bhatnagar

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar, granted anticipatory bail to Krishan Gaba, the petitioner in the case FIR No. 260/2023. The case, involving serious allegations under Sections 376, 377, and 504 of the IPC for rape and threats, saw a pivotal turn as the court observed the relationship between the petitioner and the prosecutrix to be “consensual in nature.”

The decision, pronounced on November 9, 2023, came after a detailed examination of the allegations made by the prosecutrix and the defense put forward by the petitioner. The prosecutrix had accused Gaba of forceful physical relations, threats with nude photographs, and a forced abortion. In contrast, the defense highlighted the prosecutrix’s marital status and previous actions, including a withdrawn complaint and a false divorce decree.

Justice Bhatnagar, in his observation, noted, “The relationship between the petitioner and the complainant/prosecutrix appears to be consensual in nature.” This remark played a crucial role in tilting the scales in favor of the petitioner, leading to the grant of anticipatory bail.

Represented by a team of advocates led by Dr. Adish C. Aggarwala, Sr. Adv., the petitioner’s argument focused on the inconsistencies in the complainant’s statements and her marital status. The court also took into consideration the lack of substantial evidence regarding the video-graphed sexual acts and the unsubstantiated threat complaints.

The decision has sparked discussions about the complexities Involved in cases of alleged sexual offenses, especially regarding the interpretation of consent and the impact of personal relationships on legal proceedings.

While granting anticipatory bail, the court also directed the petitioner to join the investigation as required and furnished a personal bond of Rs. 25,000. The court’s decision, however, does not reflect an opinion on the merits of the case, as clarified by Justice Bhatnagar in his order.

This judgment has opened a new chapter in the legal discourse on sexual offenses and consent, bringing to light the nuanced and delicate nature of such cases in the Indian judicial system.

Date of Decision: 09 November 2023

KRISHAN GABA  VS STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Latest Legal News