Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Delhi High Court Exposes Bias and Orders Expungement of Adverse Remarks in APAR

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has shed light on biased actions and ordered the expungement of adverse remarks in an Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR). The judgment, delivered on July 18, 2023, emphasized the importance of fair and unbiased assessments, while warning against prejudiced actions by reporting officers.

The court scrutinized the case of an officer who had received adverse remarks in his APAR, allegedly based on unserved memos. The bench found that the memos had not been communicated to the officer, denying him the opportunity to explain or improve his conduct. It was revealed that the memos had been created post facto, solely to justify the adverse report. The court firmly condemned such practices, stating, "This practice of subsequent justifications for APAR has to be deprecated in no uncertain words."

Highlighting the lack of objectivity in the assessment, the court observed that the officer had an illustrious career with meritorious awards and outstanding gradings before and after the impugned period. The adverse remarks, therefore, seemed unjustified and suggested bias on the part of the reporting officer.

Justice S. Sharma, delivering the judgment, remarked, "The conduct of the reporting officer reeks of vindictiveness and malice towards the petitioner." While refraining from recommending action against the reporting officer, who had already been dismissed from service, the court warned that no one is above the law and that biased actions would not be tolerated.

The court ordered the expungement of the adverse remarks and directed the authorities to conduct a review DPC (Departmental Promotion Committee) to consider the officer's case for promotion to the rank of Deputy Commandant. The officer would be granted promotion from the date his immediate juniors were promoted, along with all consequential benefits.

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of fair assessments and adherence to natural justice principles in the evaluation of personnel. It underlines the duty of reporting officers to act with objectivity and integrity while considering the career progression of their subordinates.

Delhi High court stated, "While making such remarks, specific instances from where such inferences were drawn must be mentioned and conveyed so that the concerned officer would have an opportunity to correct himself of the mistake."

The judgment referred to several relevant cases, including State of U.P. v Yamuna Shanker Mishra, Shri Tarsem Kumar, and Sukhdeo vs. Commissioner, Amaravati Division, among others, which further supported the court's findings.

 Date of Decision: July 18, 2023

MANUDEV DAHIYA    vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DG ITBP       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Manudev-Vs-UOI-18July23-Del.-HC.pdf"]               

Latest Legal News