Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal

Delhi High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition in Child Custody Case, Emphasizes Proper Legal Channels for Custody Claims

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today dismissed a writ petition (W.P.(CRL) 3140/2023 & Crl.M.A.29156/2023) filed by Aniket Jain, who sought the production of his child through a Habeas Corpus petition. The court, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Shalinder Kaur, underscored the importance of following proper legal procedures in family disputes, especially those involving child custody.

In the detailed judgment, the court observed that "the present petition arises out of a family dispute and such type of petitions, are sheer misuse of judicial process and waste of public time." This statement emphasizes the court's stance on the misuse of judicial resources in cases where other legal avenues are more appropriate.

The petitioner, Mr. Jain, had sought various reliefs including the production of the child born from his wedlock with Respondent No. 1 and granting him visitation rights. However, the court noted that the child, currently with the mother (Respondent No. 1), was not in illegal detention, thus making the Habeas Corpus petition inapplicable in this scenario.

Further, the court mentioned that the petitioner should have pursued a petition for custody and visitation rights in the Family Court as per the law, rather than seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus in the High Court.

Adding to the complexity of the case, the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Somiran Sharma, was reprimanded by the court for prolonging arguments irrelevant to the case, even after the petition was dismissed. The court imposed a fine of Rs.10,000 on Mr. Sharma for this conduct, emphasizing the need for legal practitioners to respect court proceedings and time.

The judgment serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of utilizing appropriate legal forums for family disputes, particularly those involving the sensitive matter of child custody. It also highlights the judiciary's effort to deter the misuse of legal processes in personal disputes.

The court granted liberty to Mr. Jain to approach the Family Court for custody and visitation rights, aligning with the established legal procedures for such matters. This ruling is expected to set a precedent in how family disputes, especially those involving children, are to be handled legally.

Date of decision: 11.12.2023

ANIKET JAIN VS SIMRAN SINGH & ORS.  

Latest Legal News