Supreme Court Modifies Directive On Sanitary Napkins In Schools, Mandates Use Of Sustainable Biodegradable And Compostable Materials Actus Curiae Neminem Gravabit | Courts Must Invoke Equitable Principles To Exempt E-Filing Delays Caused By System Failures: Supreme Court Section 47 & 48 BNSS | Substantial Compliance With Statutory Safeguards Regarding Grounds Of Arrest Sufficient To Sustain Custody: Allahabad High Court Order I Rule 10 CPC | Third Parties Claiming Independent Title Cannot Be Impleaded In Specific Performance Suits Against Plaintiff's Wish: Andhra Pradesh High Court Licensing Authority Cannot Refuse Orchestra Licence On Vague Grounds Of 'Law And Order' Without Objective Material: Bombay High Court Order Of Evacuation Under Sec 37A WB Fire Services Act Must Reflect Application Of Mind To Petitioner’s Reply: Calcutta High Court Suppression Of Criminal Antecedents | Employer Must Apply Mind To Nature Of Offence And Age Of Candidate Before Cancelling Candidature: Allahabad High Court Trial Court Cannot Pass Ex Parte Decree As If It Were Contested Merits Without Notice To Party Upon Counsel’s Withdrawal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suit For Partition Not Maintainable Without Seeking Relief Of Possession If Plaintiff Is Not In Physical Or Constructive Possession: Delhi High Court Section 482 CrPC | High Court Can Quash Matrimonial FIRs Based On Amicable Settlement To Prevent Abuse Of Process: Gujarat High Court Mere Acquittal In Criminal Case Does Not Establish Malicious Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reiterates Essential Ingredients Under Tort Law Revenue Records Do Not Confer Title; Authorities Must Record Registered Deeds Promptly To Prevent Fraudulent Transfers: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 24 CPC | Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings Is Convenience Of Wife: Orissa High Court Section 318 BNS | FIR Quashed As Court Finds Criminal Prosecution Being Used To Settle A Purely Civil Commercial Dispute: J&K High Court Principles Of Res Judicata And Delay Bar State From Reopening Decades-Old Land Tribunal Orders: Karnataka High Court Trial Court Has Discretion To Refuse Summoning Of Defence Witnesses If Application Is Vexatious Or Aimed At Delay: Kerala High Court Co-Owner’s Exclusive Possession And Non-Participation In Profits For Decades Can Raise Presumption Of Ouster: Madras High Court Competition Commission Of India Has Jurisdiction To Probe Anti-Competitive Conduct In Liquor Trade Despite State Regulatory Framework: Madhya Pradesh High Court Plaintiff Cannot Seek Title Declaration Without Proving Ownership And Precise Identity Of Disputed Property: Punjab And Haryana High Court Settlement Deed Excluding Legal Heirs From Intestate Succession Cannot Override Statutory Inheritance Rights: Madras High Court

Delhi High Court Directs Training for Newly Appointed Public Prosecutors and Addresses Pay Scale Revision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a crucial judgment, has emphasized the vital role that public prosecutors play in the criminal justice system and highlighted the urgent need for their training. The case was heard by Hon’ble Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula.

The Union of India, represented by the learned ASG Mr. Chetan Sharma, informed the court that the revision of pay scales for Assistant Public Prosecutors is under active consideration by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The government has sought information from the Chief Secretary, GNCTD regarding the financial implications of such a revision (Para 1-3).

The court expressed concern over the fact that 60 public prosecutors have been appointed recently without undergoing any formal training. The court stressed the importance of training in equipping prosecutors to discharge their responsibilities effectively (Para 4-6).

The court detailed the unique and impartial role that public prosecutors play in the justice system. Unlike counsels for complainants or other parties, a Public Prosecutor’s role is to facilitate the administration of justice while adhering to the framework of law. The court emphasized that it’s imperative for newly appointed prosecutors to be adequately trained to carry out these responsibilities (Para 5).

The court directed the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to coordinate with the Delhi Judicial Academy to organize training for the newly recruited public prosecutors. The GNCTD is also required to file a status report detailing the implementation of these training programs and the current vacancies among public prosecutors. The next hearing is set for November 1, 2023 (Para 6-7).

D.D-14.09.2023

DELHI PROSECUTORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD)vs  RAJIV MEHRISHI & ANR.       

Latest Legal News