Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court

Delhi High Court Directs Training for Newly Appointed Public Prosecutors and Addresses Pay Scale Revision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a crucial judgment, has emphasized the vital role that public prosecutors play in the criminal justice system and highlighted the urgent need for their training. The case was heard by Hon’ble Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula.

The Union of India, represented by the learned ASG Mr. Chetan Sharma, informed the court that the revision of pay scales for Assistant Public Prosecutors is under active consideration by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The government has sought information from the Chief Secretary, GNCTD regarding the financial implications of such a revision (Para 1-3).

The court expressed concern over the fact that 60 public prosecutors have been appointed recently without undergoing any formal training. The court stressed the importance of training in equipping prosecutors to discharge their responsibilities effectively (Para 4-6).

The court detailed the unique and impartial role that public prosecutors play in the justice system. Unlike counsels for complainants or other parties, a Public Prosecutor’s role is to facilitate the administration of justice while adhering to the framework of law. The court emphasized that it’s imperative for newly appointed prosecutors to be adequately trained to carry out these responsibilities (Para 5).

The court directed the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to coordinate with the Delhi Judicial Academy to organize training for the newly recruited public prosecutors. The GNCTD is also required to file a status report detailing the implementation of these training programs and the current vacancies among public prosecutors. The next hearing is set for November 1, 2023 (Para 6-7).

D.D-14.09.2023

DELHI PROSECUTORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD)vs  RAJIV MEHRISHI & ANR.       

Latest Legal News