High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Divorce Cannot Be Granted Merely on WhatsApp Chats: Bombay High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Decree Based on Unproved Electronic Evidence State Cannot Demand Settlement Amount Yet Withhold Legitimate Refund: Bombay High Court Strikes Down MVAT Settlement Order Surveyor’s Report Is Not Sacrosanct; Arbitral Award Ignoring Vital Evidence Is Perverse: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Insurance Arbitration Award When Victim Lives Under Exclusive Control Of Accused, Burden Shifts To Accused To Explain What Happened: Calcutta High Court Medical Evidence Clearly Indicating Suicide Cannot Be Overlooked, Prosecution Must Prove Homicidal Death Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Candidates Acted With Full Knowledge of Consequences': Kerala High Court Reverses Order for Refund of 10% Exit Fee in Medical PG Mop-Up Admissions Dispensing with Departmental Inquiry Without Material is Arbitrary: Supreme Court Sets Aside Dismissal of Delhi Police Constable Power Of Attorney Holder Authorized To Enforce Pre-Emption Right Can File Suit, Death Of Principal Does Not Bar Legal Heirs: Orissa High Court Government Servant Convicted In Criminal Case Can Be Dismissed Without Departmental Enquiry: Tripura High Court Upholds Teacher’s Dismissal RTI Cannot Be Used To Bypass Statutory Bar On Police Case Diaries: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Penalty Against Police Officers Externment Cannot Be Based On Police Report And Stale Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes District Magistrate’s Order Even Exonerated Accused Can Be Summoned During Trial: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Summoning Under Section 358 BNSS Benefit of Doubt Acquittal Not Equal to Honourable Acquittal: Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Police Constable Candidate Madras High Court Allows NEET-Failed Student To Appear In CBSE Class XII Mathematics Exam After Last-Minute Subject Switch By Parents Salary of Parents Cannot Be Used to Deny OBC Non-Creamy Layer Status in Absence of Post Equivalence: Supreme Court Father Who Rapes Minor Daughter Cannot Seek Leniency: Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment Construction Of Toilet Is Bare Necessity For Proper Use Of Premises, Expression "Own Use" Not Confined To Landlord's Personal Physical Use: Calcutta High Court 353 IPC | Conviction Cannot Rest On Uncorroborated Testimony Of Sole Witness When Other Evidence Contradicts Occurrence: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal 250 BNSS | 60-Day Discharge Period Is Procedural, Does Not Extinguish Accused's Right To Seek Discharge: Gujarat High Court Section 45 PMLA Cannot Become an Instrument of Endless Incarceration: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in ₹18 Crore Scholarship Scam Case Land Acquisition — Heirs Who Slept on Rights for 23 Years Cannot Claim Ignorance to Revive Dead Challenge: Karnataka High Court Institutional Hearing Is No Violation of Natural Justice: Kerala High Court Upholds BPCL’s Termination of Decades-Old Petroleum Dealership Witnesses Not Expected To Recount Past Incidents With Mathematical Precision, Minor Contradictions Don't Demolish Credibility: Orissa High Court If a Suit Is Ex Facie Barred by Limitation, the Court Has No Choice but to Dismiss It: P&H High Court

Delhi High Court Directs Training for Newly Appointed Public Prosecutors and Addresses Pay Scale Revision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court, in a crucial judgment, has emphasized the vital role that public prosecutors play in the criminal justice system and highlighted the urgent need for their training. The case was heard by Hon’ble Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula.

The Union of India, represented by the learned ASG Mr. Chetan Sharma, informed the court that the revision of pay scales for Assistant Public Prosecutors is under active consideration by the Ministry of Home Affairs. The government has sought information from the Chief Secretary, GNCTD regarding the financial implications of such a revision (Para 1-3).

The court expressed concern over the fact that 60 public prosecutors have been appointed recently without undergoing any formal training. The court stressed the importance of training in equipping prosecutors to discharge their responsibilities effectively (Para 4-6).

The court detailed the unique and impartial role that public prosecutors play in the justice system. Unlike counsels for complainants or other parties, a Public Prosecutor’s role is to facilitate the administration of justice while adhering to the framework of law. The court emphasized that it’s imperative for newly appointed prosecutors to be adequately trained to carry out these responsibilities (Para 5).

The court directed the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) to coordinate with the Delhi Judicial Academy to organize training for the newly recruited public prosecutors. The GNCTD is also required to file a status report detailing the implementation of these training programs and the current vacancies among public prosecutors. The next hearing is set for November 1, 2023 (Para 6-7).

D.D-14.09.2023

DELHI PROSECUTORS WELFARE ASSOCIATION (REGD)vs  RAJIV MEHRISHI & ANR.       

Latest Legal News