Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Delhi High Court Directs Central Government to 'Consider the Grievance of the Petitioners' Over SSB Promotions and Deputations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has directed the Central Government to "consider the grievance of the petitioners" in cases related to promotions and deputations within the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The ruling comes in response to writ petitions filed by SSB officers holding the rank of Second-in-Command and Deputy Commandant.

The petitioners had challenged a Signal dated 14th August 2023, which called for nominations of officers from other Central Armed Police Forces to fill up Commandant posts in SSB. The officers argue that such a decision "would hamper their promotional avenues."

The Court also mentioned that in terms of the Recruitment Rules dated 17th June 2013, priority should be given to filling up the post by promotion before considering the option of deputation. The petitioners' counsel argued that those considered for deputation "have not undergone promotional courses as prescribed by the Director-General of the SSB."

One of the key issues raised by the petitioners was the Central Government's power of relaxation as per Rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that although the petitioners were not eligible as of the date, they were only "short of a few months from completing the requisite five years of regular service." He highlighted that such power has been exercised in the past "in the interest of the force."

Another pivotal point was about the morale and career progression of the SSB officers. The Court observed that if officers from other forces were brought in on deputation, "the morale of the officers serving in the SSB for last several years is likely to be affected."

The High Court disposed of the petitions, directing that they should be placed before the competent authority i.e., the Central Government. The authority has also been directed to "consider the request of the petitioners for exercise of the power conferred of relaxation and/or appointment or grant of local rank to the officers."

The Court clarified that the competent authority should take "an independent view of the matter without being influenced by anything stated in this order on merit."

 Date of Decision: 20 October  2023

SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-SanjayKumar-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Latest Legal News