Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Delhi High Court Directs Central Government to 'Consider the Grievance of the Petitioners' Over SSB Promotions and Deputations

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Delhi High Court has directed the Central Government to "consider the grievance of the petitioners" in cases related to promotions and deputations within the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB). The ruling comes in response to writ petitions filed by SSB officers holding the rank of Second-in-Command and Deputy Commandant.

The petitioners had challenged a Signal dated 14th August 2023, which called for nominations of officers from other Central Armed Police Forces to fill up Commandant posts in SSB. The officers argue that such a decision "would hamper their promotional avenues."

The Court also mentioned that in terms of the Recruitment Rules dated 17th June 2013, priority should be given to filling up the post by promotion before considering the option of deputation. The petitioners' counsel argued that those considered for deputation "have not undergone promotional courses as prescribed by the Director-General of the SSB."

One of the key issues raised by the petitioners was the Central Government's power of relaxation as per Rule 9 of the Recruitment Rules. The learned counsel for the petitioners stated that although the petitioners were not eligible as of the date, they were only "short of a few months from completing the requisite five years of regular service." He highlighted that such power has been exercised in the past "in the interest of the force."

Another pivotal point was about the morale and career progression of the SSB officers. The Court observed that if officers from other forces were brought in on deputation, "the morale of the officers serving in the SSB for last several years is likely to be affected."

The High Court disposed of the petitions, directing that they should be placed before the competent authority i.e., the Central Government. The authority has also been directed to "consider the request of the petitioners for exercise of the power conferred of relaxation and/or appointment or grant of local rank to the officers."

The Court clarified that the competent authority should take "an independent view of the matter without being influenced by anything stated in this order on merit."

 Date of Decision: 20 October  2023

SANJAY KUMAR AND ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20-Oct-2023-SanjayKumar-Vs-UOI.pdf"]

Similar News