Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief

Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Accused in Organized Crime Syndicate Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, a special court has denied bail to the accused involved in an alleged organized crime syndicate. The judgement, delivered by Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma on July 11, 2023, highlights the gravity of the charges and the organized nature of the crime. The court's decision comes after a meticulous examination of the evidence presented.

According to the judgement, which sheds light on the court's reasoning, "The disclosure statements of accused persons clearly show that the Petitioner received money through Hawala transactions and failed to explain the details of such entries credited in her bank account." The court further observed that the accused, despite being a successful businesswoman, failed to account for substantial sums of money used to purchase luxury cars and engage in extravagant activities.

The court emphasized that the bail stage is not meant for a detailed evaluation of evidence but requires reasonable grounds to believe that the accused have not committed the offense. It stated, "If there is a preponderance of probabilities that the accused can be convicted on the material available, the bail is liable to be rejected."

Justice Sharma also remarked, "It is beyond comprehension that a lady who is well-educated will not know the source of money," underscoring the court's doubts regarding the accused's claims of innocence. The judgement highlights the coordinated efforts of the accused, including communication with the main accused while in prison and involvement in multiple crimes over the past decade.

The bench's decision has been hailed as a significant step in combating organized crime. The court's rejection of bail underscores the need to prevent potential harm and ensure the integrity of the legal process. The case, being tried under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act (MCOCA), has raised public concerns about the prevalence of such syndicates and the need for stringent action.

Date of Decision: July 11, 2023

KAMLESH KOTHARI   vs   STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

Similar News