Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Delhi High Court affirms charitable trust’s right to accumulate and donate surplus funds, reinforcing exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of Income Tax Act.

07 December 2024 4:23 PM

By: sayum


The Delhi High Court has upheld the decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in favor of M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation, confirming the trust's entitlement to deductions under Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justices Yashwant Varma and Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, emphasized the legality of utilizing accumulated income for donations to other charitable trusts, even when deemed income provisions are triggered.

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) challenged the ITAT's decision, which allowed M/S Jamnalal Bajaj Foundation a deduction under Section 11(1) on deemed income, despite the funds being transferred to other charitable trusts. The trust, registered under Section 12A and enjoying benefits under Section 80G, had filed a revised return in 2011 after transferring Rs. 20 crores accumulated under Section 11(2) for corpus donations.

The court highlighted that donations to other charitable trusts constitute a valid application of accumulated income for charitable purposes. "The handing over of accumulated income to another trust with similar objects is considered application of income for charitable purposes," the bench noted, referencing several precedents including CIT v. Natwarlal Chowdhury Charity Trust and CIT v. J.K. Charitable Trust.

Justice Yashwant Varma, writing the judgment, elaborated on the interplay between Sections 11(1) and 11(2), and the deemed income provisions under Section 11(3). The court noted that Section 11(2) allows charitable entities to accumulate up to 85% of their income, provided it is invested as per specified modes. Donations to other charitable entities, as long as they are in line with the original charitable purpose, do not violate the provisions of Section 11(3)(c) or (d).

The court reaffirmed that extending donations to other charitable institutions meets the test of application of income for charitable purposes, even if such donations temporarily attract deemed income provisions. "Section 11(3) would be attracted if the accumulated income is not utilized for the specified charitable purposes, but temporary application for donations does not constitute such a diversion," the court stated.

Citing the Supreme Court's decision in Additional Commissioner of Income Tax v. A.L.N. Rao Charitable Trust and judgments from the Madras High Court and Allahabad High Court, the bench elucidated that accumulated income used for charitable donations maintains its tax-exempt status. The court also referenced Explanation 2 to Section 11(1), introduced by the Finance Act, 2017, to illustrate that contributions forming part of the corpus of another trust are not treated as application of income.

Justice Yashwant Varma remarked, "Donations to other charitable trusts do not lose the protection of tax exemption merely because they temporarily constitute deemed income. The core objective remains the application of income for charitable purposes, which the law seeks to uphold."

The Delhi High Court's judgment reinforces the legal provisions allowing charitable trusts to accumulate and donate income without forfeiting tax exemptions. This decision is significant for charitable entities, affirming their ability to support other charities while maintaining compliance with tax regulations. The ruling provides clarity on the application of Sections 11 and 12, setting a precedent for future cases involving charitable donations and tax exemptions.

Date of Decision: May 31, 2024

Latest Legal News