Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Supreme Court Bars Post-Divorce Maintenance Claims When Wife Voluntarily Waived Maintenance In Settlement Agreement Advocate Is An Officer Of Court, Not Mere Agent Of Client: Allahabad High Court Distinguishes Between Active Concealment & Statement In Ignorance, Slaps Cost On Litigants For Misleading Bench Cannot Summon Accused Mechanically On Protest Petition Without Assigning Justifiable Reasons: Andhra Pradesh High Court Increment Not A Bounty: Allahabad High Court Rules Public Holiday Cannot Delay Pay Hike For Teachers Joining Next Working Day Paying Taxes Or Utility Connections Confer No Legal Ownership Over Govt Land': Andhra Pradesh High Court Orders Demolition Of Encroachment 'Cannot Compel Public Authority To Collect Data From Private Bodies': Bombay High Court Quashes CIC Orders Directing SEBI To Procure BSE Records Under RTI Act Section 10 CPC Cannot Stay Previously Instituted Title Suit Pending Subsequent Probate Case; Inherent Powers Under Section 151 Inapplicable When Probate Dismissed: Calcutta High Court Mere Phone Calls Without Transcripts No Ground For Murder Conspiracy: Delhi High Court Clear Violation Of Section 42 NDPS Act': Gujarat High Court Holds Failure To Record Secret Info In Writing Fatal When Police Officer Had Time To Act JK High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Cop Accused Of Threatening Advocate Over Phone Call Without Prior Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Custody Unwarranted For Mere Formalities Once Weapon Is Recovered: Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail In BNS Axe Attack Case Circumstances Of Crime Can Be Assessed During Trial: High Court Upholds Trial Of Minor As Adult Under JJ Act In Murder Case Statutory Deposit Under Order 21 Rule 89 CPC Is A Sine Qua Non; Litigant Cannot Stall Auction Sale By Merely Blaming Counsel: Madras High Court

Delhi Court Upholds Wrestling Federation’s Discretion in Exempting Elite Athletes from Selection Trials for Asian Games: “Decision Best Left to the Experts,”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court reaffirmed the authority of sports federations to exercise discretion in selecting athletes for international competitions. The judgement, delivered by Justice Subramonium Prasad on July 22, 2023, upheld the decision of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) to exempt elite wrestlers from selection trials for the upcoming Asian Games.

The Court emphasized that the selection of athletes for international sporting events should be left to the expertise of the respective National Sports Federations. Citing previous precedents, the judge stated, “In matters of selecting the best possible candidate to represent India in an international competitive event, there cannot be any interference by this Court in the selection criteria set down by the National Sports Federation concerned.”

The case revolved around the exemption of Respondents No.3 and No.4, both elite athletes, from participating in the selection trials. The WFI, comprising experts in the field of wrestling, unanimously decided to exempt them to prevent potential injuries, given their outstanding performance in world wrestling events.

Justice Prasad highlighted the limited scope of judicial review in sports selection matters, emphasizing that the Court’s interference would only be justified if the discretion of the federation was exercised in an arbitrary, capricious, or perverse manner. “The court cannot clothe itself with the power to make choices and should not substitute its decision over a decision of an Expert Committee,” the judge added.

Addressing concerns of litigations disrupting athletes’ preparation and performance, the Court urged caution in exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The ruling emphasized that unnecessary litigations could have adverse effects on the mental and emotional preparedness of players representing the nation in international sports events.

The judgement also addressed disputed documents presented during the proceedings, asserting that their veracity could only be determined through appropriate litigation.

Date of Decision: July 22, 2023

SUJEET AND ANR   vs  UNION OF INDIA AND ORS     

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Sujeet_Vs_UOI_22July2023_Del.pdf"]

Latest Legal News