IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

Delay in Sale Deed Registration After Full Payment Cannot Justify Denial of Auctioned Property: Andhra Pradesh HC

29 September 2024 12:29 PM

By: sayum


Andhra Pradesh High Court issued a significant ruling in the case of Aditya Academy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others, where the court addressed the 20-year delay in registering a sale deed after a public auction. The court ruled that the delay in completing the registration process could not be used to deny the rightful transfer of property to the highest bidder.

The case arose from a public auction held on September 11, 2002, where the petitioner, Aditya Academy, represented by Karri Venkata Krishna Reddy, emerged as the highest bidder for a property belonging to Sri Nookalamma Vari Devasthanam in Kakinada. Despite paying the full bid amount of ₹34,75,000 by June 2003, the sale deed was never registered in favor of the academy, leading to a prolonged legal battle.

The academy had been in possession of the property for over 20 years, but the authorities refused to register the property, citing delays in paying the remaining bid amount and changes in the academy’s representation.

The key issue was whether the failure to promptly pay the remaining bid amount within the stipulated time period of 15 days could invalidate the auction or justify the authorities' refusal to register the sale deed, despite the full amount being paid and possession of the property being transferred.

The petitioner argued that the full payment had been made and possession granted, making it unreasonable for the authorities to withhold the registration. The respondents, however, contended that the delay in payment violated the auction conditions.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Aditya Academy, directing the respondent authorities to execute the sale deed. The court held that since the entire bid amount had been paid, and the property was in the possession of the academy, the authorities could not withhold the sale deed indefinitely.

Justice B. Krishna Mohan noted that the auction was confirmed in 2002, and the academy had taken possession of the property. The court emphasized that the delay in payment, though a violation of auction conditions, did not justify depriving the academy of its right to registration, especially since the authorities had accepted the full payment and used the funds for temple purposes.

The court cited Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 80 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, stating that the respondents were legally obligated to complete the registration after receiving the full bid amount.

The court set aside the impugned proceedings dated November 4, 2022, and directed the respondents to complete the registration of the sale deed within two months. The writ petition was allowed, bringing closure to a decades-long dispute over the auctioned property.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Aditya Academy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others​.

Similar News