Use of Modified Trademark 'MAHINDRA ZEO' Does Not Infringe Plaintiff’s 'EZIO': Delhi High Court High Court Quashes Proceedings for Two Accused in Unauthorized Construction Case, Criticizes Arbitrary Implication Commissioner Duty Bound to Decide Appeal on Merits: High Court Clarifies Application of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Dismissal of Petitions Seeking Quashing of Proceedings in Fraudulent Land Transactions Involving Government-Vested Land: Calcutta High Court Quashing FIR in Dowry Harassment Case Not Justified Without Thorough Investigation," Rules Kerala High Court Deletion of Name from Revenue Records Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice: Andhra Pradesh High Court Delay in Seeking Compassionate Appointment Defeats Purpose of Scheme: Orissa High Court Overturns Single Judge Order Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Temporary Injunction in LLP Fraud Case: No Prima Facie Evidence of Fraud Established Kerala High Court Upholds Departmental Proceedings Against Police Officer on Deputation for Immigration Duty Judicial Review Under Article 226 Is Not an Appeal Over Disciplinary Findings: Punjab and Haryana High Court Lack of Medical and Scientific Evidence Prevents Conviction in Sodomy Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused Under POCSO Act Overwriting and Minor Discrepancies Do Not Vitiate Valid Execution of Will: Calcutta High Court Full Back Wages Awarded to Dismissed Co-operative Bank Employee for Suspension Period: Kerala High Court Character Assassination by Husband Justifies Wife's Refusal to Co-Habit: Orissa High Court Upholds Maintenance Award to Wife Defendants Forfeited Tenancy by Denouncing Plaintiffs' Title: Punjab and Haryana High Court Rules in Land Dispute Procedural Rules Must Facilitate Justice, Not Obstruct It, Says Court While Allowing Applications for Additional Documents in a Commercial Suit: Andhra Pradesh High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Dismisses Appeals Over Disputed Sale Deeds, Affirms Need for Concrete Evidence of Minor Status

Delay in Sale Deed Registration After Full Payment Cannot Justify Denial of Auctioned Property: Andhra Pradesh HC

29 September 2024 12:29 PM

By: sayum


Andhra Pradesh High Court issued a significant ruling in the case of Aditya Academy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others, where the court addressed the 20-year delay in registering a sale deed after a public auction. The court ruled that the delay in completing the registration process could not be used to deny the rightful transfer of property to the highest bidder.

The case arose from a public auction held on September 11, 2002, where the petitioner, Aditya Academy, represented by Karri Venkata Krishna Reddy, emerged as the highest bidder for a property belonging to Sri Nookalamma Vari Devasthanam in Kakinada. Despite paying the full bid amount of ₹34,75,000 by June 2003, the sale deed was never registered in favor of the academy, leading to a prolonged legal battle.

The academy had been in possession of the property for over 20 years, but the authorities refused to register the property, citing delays in paying the remaining bid amount and changes in the academy’s representation.

The key issue was whether the failure to promptly pay the remaining bid amount within the stipulated time period of 15 days could invalidate the auction or justify the authorities' refusal to register the sale deed, despite the full amount being paid and possession of the property being transferred.

The petitioner argued that the full payment had been made and possession granted, making it unreasonable for the authorities to withhold the registration. The respondents, however, contended that the delay in payment violated the auction conditions.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, Aditya Academy, directing the respondent authorities to execute the sale deed. The court held that since the entire bid amount had been paid, and the property was in the possession of the academy, the authorities could not withhold the sale deed indefinitely.

Justice B. Krishna Mohan noted that the auction was confirmed in 2002, and the academy had taken possession of the property. The court emphasized that the delay in payment, though a violation of auction conditions, did not justify depriving the academy of its right to registration, especially since the authorities had accepted the full payment and used the funds for temple purposes.

The court cited Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act and Section 80 of the A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987, stating that the respondents were legally obligated to complete the registration after receiving the full bid amount.

The court set aside the impugned proceedings dated November 4, 2022, and directed the respondents to complete the registration of the sale deed within two months. The writ petition was allowed, bringing closure to a decades-long dispute over the auctioned property.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Aditya Academy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others​.

Similar News