Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Debarment Without Proper Show Cause Notice Cannot Be Sustained – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Debarment of M/S State Engineers by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today set aside the debarment communication issued by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd. (PPCL) against M/S State Engineers, emphasizing the fundamental principle of natural justice in administrative decision-making.

The petitioner, M/S State Engineers, had approached the court challenging the communication dated 17.06.2020, which debarred them from participating in any tenders floated by IPGCL or PPCL for a period of three years. The debarment was based on allegations of non-payment of wages and other dues to contractual employees.

In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, the court scrutinized the circumstances leading to the debarment. The court observed, "Pursuant to the show cause notice, replies have been given by the Petitioner and the impugned communication dated 17.06.2020 has been issued by the Respondent debarring the Petitioner for a period of three years from participating in any tenders floated either by the IPGCL or PPCL."

Highlighting the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the court found that there was a lack of a specific show cause notice for the debarment. Justice Prasad noted, "It is not the case of the Respondent that violation of a term of contract would automatically result in debarment. It is now well settled by the Apex Court in a number of judgments that before debarring any entity, a notice must be given to that entity informing that the entity would be debarred. Debarment without show cause notice cannot be sustained."

The court also referred to the Apex Court's observations in UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Food Corporation of India, which underscore the necessity of a prior show-cause notice and reasonable opportunity of being heard before any action like blacklisting or debarment is taken.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court set aside the debarment communication and allowed the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice to the petitioner for debarment on valid grounds, emphasizing the need for fair and just administrative processes.

Date of Decision: 1st February, 2024

M/S STATE ENGINEERS VS PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LTD.

 

Latest Legal News