Conviction Under Section 409 IPC Postulates Strict Proof Of Entrustment; Suspicion However Grave Cannot Substitute Proof: Supreme Court Criminal Prosecution Emanating From Past Matrimonial Relationship Ought Not To Linger After Divorce: Supreme Court Negligence Of Previous Counsel Not A Ground To Reopen Concluded Pre-Charge Evidence Under Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court Unregistered Agreement To Sell Cannot Protect Tenant's Possession Under Section 53A Transfer Of Property Act: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Registered Sale Deeds Admissible As Secondary Evidence Without Proving Loss Of Original: Gauhati High Court Counsel Representing Deceased Party Must Inform Court Of Death Under Order XXII Rule 10-A CPC: J&K High Court Son Staying In Father's House Out Of Love And Affection Is A Mere Licensee, Cannot Challenge Father's Title: Delhi High Court Conviction For Murder Cannot Stand Where Single Blow Inflicted In Sudden Fight Without Premeditation: Uttarakhand High Court Inability To Trace Suppliers Or Buyers No Ground For Custodial Interrogation Once Recovery Is Effected: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Assemble Peacefully To Celebrate Association Anniversary Is A Fundamental Right; Unlawful Assembly Per Se Not An Offence: Madras High Court Marriage Photographs Can Be Relied Upon To Estimate Quantity Of Gold Ornaments In Matrimonial Disputes: Kerala High Court POCSO Act Not Confined To Securing Convictions, Soul Of Law Lies In Preserving Childhood Dignity & Healing: Madras High Court Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court

Debarment Without Proper Show Cause Notice Cannot Be Sustained – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Debarment of M/S State Engineers by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today set aside the debarment communication issued by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd. (PPCL) against M/S State Engineers, emphasizing the fundamental principle of natural justice in administrative decision-making.

The petitioner, M/S State Engineers, had approached the court challenging the communication dated 17.06.2020, which debarred them from participating in any tenders floated by IPGCL or PPCL for a period of three years. The debarment was based on allegations of non-payment of wages and other dues to contractual employees.

In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, the court scrutinized the circumstances leading to the debarment. The court observed, "Pursuant to the show cause notice, replies have been given by the Petitioner and the impugned communication dated 17.06.2020 has been issued by the Respondent debarring the Petitioner for a period of three years from participating in any tenders floated either by the IPGCL or PPCL."

Highlighting the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the court found that there was a lack of a specific show cause notice for the debarment. Justice Prasad noted, "It is not the case of the Respondent that violation of a term of contract would automatically result in debarment. It is now well settled by the Apex Court in a number of judgments that before debarring any entity, a notice must be given to that entity informing that the entity would be debarred. Debarment without show cause notice cannot be sustained."

The court also referred to the Apex Court's observations in UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Food Corporation of India, which underscore the necessity of a prior show-cause notice and reasonable opportunity of being heard before any action like blacklisting or debarment is taken.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court set aside the debarment communication and allowed the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice to the petitioner for debarment on valid grounds, emphasizing the need for fair and just administrative processes.

Date of Decision: 1st February, 2024

M/S STATE ENGINEERS VS PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LTD.

 

Latest Legal News