Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

Debarment Without Proper Show Cause Notice Cannot Be Sustained – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Debarment of M/S State Engineers by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today set aside the debarment communication issued by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd. (PPCL) against M/S State Engineers, emphasizing the fundamental principle of natural justice in administrative decision-making.

The petitioner, M/S State Engineers, had approached the court challenging the communication dated 17.06.2020, which debarred them from participating in any tenders floated by IPGCL or PPCL for a period of three years. The debarment was based on allegations of non-payment of wages and other dues to contractual employees.

In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, the court scrutinized the circumstances leading to the debarment. The court observed, "Pursuant to the show cause notice, replies have been given by the Petitioner and the impugned communication dated 17.06.2020 has been issued by the Respondent debarring the Petitioner for a period of three years from participating in any tenders floated either by the IPGCL or PPCL."

Highlighting the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the court found that there was a lack of a specific show cause notice for the debarment. Justice Prasad noted, "It is not the case of the Respondent that violation of a term of contract would automatically result in debarment. It is now well settled by the Apex Court in a number of judgments that before debarring any entity, a notice must be given to that entity informing that the entity would be debarred. Debarment without show cause notice cannot be sustained."

The court also referred to the Apex Court's observations in UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Food Corporation of India, which underscore the necessity of a prior show-cause notice and reasonable opportunity of being heard before any action like blacklisting or debarment is taken.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court set aside the debarment communication and allowed the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice to the petitioner for debarment on valid grounds, emphasizing the need for fair and just administrative processes.

Date of Decision: 1st February, 2024

M/S STATE ENGINEERS VS PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LTD.

 

Latest Legal News