Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Debarment Without Proper Show Cause Notice Cannot Be Sustained – Delhi High Court Sets Aside Debarment of M/S State Engineers by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court today set aside the debarment communication issued by Pragati Power Corporation Ltd. (PPCL) against M/S State Engineers, emphasizing the fundamental principle of natural justice in administrative decision-making.

The petitioner, M/S State Engineers, had approached the court challenging the communication dated 17.06.2020, which debarred them from participating in any tenders floated by IPGCL or PPCL for a period of three years. The debarment was based on allegations of non-payment of wages and other dues to contractual employees.

In the judgment delivered by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Subramonium Prasad, the court scrutinized the circumstances leading to the debarment. The court observed, "Pursuant to the show cause notice, replies have been given by the Petitioner and the impugned communication dated 17.06.2020 has been issued by the Respondent debarring the Petitioner for a period of three years from participating in any tenders floated either by the IPGCL or PPCL."

Highlighting the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice, the court found that there was a lack of a specific show cause notice for the debarment. Justice Prasad noted, "It is not the case of the Respondent that violation of a term of contract would automatically result in debarment. It is now well settled by the Apex Court in a number of judgments that before debarring any entity, a notice must be given to that entity informing that the entity would be debarred. Debarment without show cause notice cannot be sustained."

The court also referred to the Apex Court's observations in UMC Technologies (P) Ltd. v. Food Corporation of India, which underscore the necessity of a prior show-cause notice and reasonable opportunity of being heard before any action like blacklisting or debarment is taken.

Concluding the judgment, the High Court set aside the debarment communication and allowed the respondent to issue a fresh show cause notice to the petitioner for debarment on valid grounds, emphasizing the need for fair and just administrative processes.

Date of Decision: 1st February, 2024

M/S STATE ENGINEERS VS PRAGATI POWER CORPORATION LTD.

 

Latest Legal News