Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court

Daughter-in-Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Parents-in-Law Not Maintainable Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, has held that a daughter-in-law cannot claim maintenance from her parents-in-law under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The decision, delivered by Justice V. Srishananda on February 21, 2024, arises from a revision petition challenging the jurisdiction and validity of a maintenance order by the Family Court.

The Court scrutinized the scope of Section 125 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that it does not extend to enabling a daughter-in-law to seek maintenance from her parents-in-law. This legal interpretation became central to the decision.

Respondents Tasleem Jamela Agadi and her children, after the death of her husband Khaja Mainudden Agadi, sought maintenance from the petitioners, her parents-in-law. The Family Court ordered the petitioners to pay Rs. 20,000 monthly to Tasleem and Rs. 5,000 each to the minors.

The petitioners contested the Family Court’s decision, questioning the jurisdiction of the Magistrate under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to entertain such a petition. Conversely, the respondents argued for the maintenance, citing the petitioners’ failure to look after their welfare.

The High Court meticulously analyzed Section 125 of Cr.P.C., highlighting that the provision caters to maintenance claims by wives, children, and parents, but not by a daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law. Justice Srishananda noted, “In the absence of any power vested in the Court under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., to entertain a petition filed by the daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law, the entire order is devoid of jurisdiction.”

The Court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the order of the Family Court and dismissing the maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the parents-in-law. However, the Court clarified that this does not bar the respondents from seeking appropriate legal relief against the petitioners.

Date of Decision: 21st February 2024

Abdul Khader and Another v. Tasleem Jamela Agadi and Others

Latest Legal News