Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Daughter-in-Law’s Maintenance Claim Against Parents-in-Law Not Maintainable Under Section 125 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court, Dharwad Bench, has held that a daughter-in-law cannot claim maintenance from her parents-in-law under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.). The decision, delivered by Justice V. Srishananda on February 21, 2024, arises from a revision petition challenging the jurisdiction and validity of a maintenance order by the Family Court.

The Court scrutinized the scope of Section 125 Cr.P.C., emphasizing that it does not extend to enabling a daughter-in-law to seek maintenance from her parents-in-law. This legal interpretation became central to the decision.

Respondents Tasleem Jamela Agadi and her children, after the death of her husband Khaja Mainudden Agadi, sought maintenance from the petitioners, her parents-in-law. The Family Court ordered the petitioners to pay Rs. 20,000 monthly to Tasleem and Rs. 5,000 each to the minors.

The petitioners contested the Family Court’s decision, questioning the jurisdiction of the Magistrate under Section 125 Cr.P.C. to entertain such a petition. Conversely, the respondents argued for the maintenance, citing the petitioners’ failure to look after their welfare.

The High Court meticulously analyzed Section 125 of Cr.P.C., highlighting that the provision caters to maintenance claims by wives, children, and parents, but not by a daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law. Justice Srishananda noted, “In the absence of any power vested in the Court under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., to entertain a petition filed by the daughter-in-law against her parents-in-law, the entire order is devoid of jurisdiction.”

The Court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the order of the Family Court and dismissing the maintenance petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. against the parents-in-law. However, the Court clarified that this does not bar the respondents from seeking appropriate legal relief against the petitioners.

Date of Decision: 21st February 2024

Abdul Khader and Another v. Tasleem Jamela Agadi and Others

Latest Legal News