CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness Employee Cannot Switch Cadre At His Sweet Will After Accepting Promotion: J&K High Court Rejects Claim For Retrospective Assistant Registrar Appointment Anticipatory Bail Cannot Expire With Charge-Sheet: Supreme Court Reiterates Liberty Is Not Bound by Procedural Milestones Order II Rule 2 Cannot Eclipse Amendment Power Under Order VI Rule 17: MP High Court Refuses to Stall Will-Based Title Suit Grounds of Arrest Must Be Personal, Not Formal – But Detailed Allegations Suffice: Kerala High Court Upholds Arrest in Sabarimala Gold Misappropriation Case Grounds of Arrest Are Not a Ritual – They Are a Constitutional Mandate Under Article 22(1): Allahabad High Court Sets Aside Arrest for Non-Supply of Written Grounds Sect. 25 NDPS | Mere Ownership Cannot Fasten NDPS Liability – ‘Knowingly Permits’ Must Be Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt: MP High Court Section 308 CrPC | Revocation of Pardon Is Not Automatic on Prosecutor’s Certificate: Karnataka High Court Joint Family and Ancestral Property Are Alien to Mohammedan Law: Gujarat High Court Sets Aside Injunction Right to Health Cannot Wait for Endless Consultations: Supreme Court Pulls Up FSSAI Over Delay in Front-of-Pack Warning Labels If A Son Dies Intestate Leaving Wife And Children, The Mother Has No Share: Karnataka High Court

Cruelties Committed by Appellant Rendered Respondent's Stay at Parental Home a Compulsion: Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal of Marriage Dissolution Petition

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court's recent judgment in the case of Suman Kumar Bhan vs. Durga Bhan nee Haifz dealt with an appeal against the dismissal of a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. The court meticulously examined allegations of cruelty and desertion by the appellant, underlining the importance of substantiated evidence in such matrimonial disputes.

The appellant, Suman Kumar Bhan, appealed against the Family Court's decision, which dismissed his petition for dissolving the marriage with Durga Bhan. The primary issues revolved around allegations of non-disclosure of health issues, cruelty by the respondent, desertion, property disputes, and the long duration of separation since April 27, 2000.

Alleged Non-Disclosure and Health Issues: The court noted the appellant's claims of the respondent concealing her age and health condition, including a pre-marriage surgery. However, it found a lack of substantive evidence to support these claims, viewing them as cruelty towards the respondent.

Allegations of Cruelty: The appellant's accusations of mental and emotional cruelty, including dominance, refusal of sexual relations, and extra-marital affairs, were found unsubstantiated due to a lack of specific incidents or proof.

Desertion and Property Disputes: The court observed that the respondent's allegations of being forced out of the matrimonial home and disputes over property were compelling. The appellant failed to make efforts to bring the respondent back or seek restitution of conjugal rights, suggesting that the respondent's stay at her parent's house was due to the appellant's actions.

Duration of Separation: The significant separation period highlighted the irreparable breakdown of the marital bond, but it didn't justify dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty or desertion by the respondent.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's judgment. It concluded that the appellant's allegations were uncorroborated and amounted to cruelty towards the respondent, and the respondent's departure from the matrimonial home was due to the appellant's actions, not willful desertion.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

Suman Kumar Bhan vs. Durga Bhan nee Haifz

 

Latest Legal News