Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court Execution of Eviction Decree Limited to Suit Premises; Additional Claims Not Permissible: Bombay High Court Only Apprentices Under the 1961 Act Are Excluded from Gratuity – Calcutta High Court Demand for Penalty and Interest Without Following Natural Justice Violates Section 11A of the Central Excise Act: P&H High Court Rajasthan High Court Acquits Bank Manager, Citing "Processing Fee, Not Bribe" in Corruption Case Compensatory Nature of Section 138 NI Act Permits Compounding Even at Revisional Stage: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 99 Crore: Faults Adjudicating Authority for Contradictory Findings Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Permitted Even at Revisional Stage with Reduced Fee in Special Circumstances: HP High Court No Renewal, Only Re-Tendering’ – Upholds Railway Board’s MPS License Policy: Delhi High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Second FIR Against Former Minister in Corruption Case Nature of Suit Must Be Determined on Evidence, Not Technical Grounds: Delhi High Court on Rejection of Plaint Economic Offences Must Be Scrutinized to Protect Public Interest:  Allahabad High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash FIR Against Cloud Investment Scheme Company Golden Hour Care Is a Matter of Right, Not Privilege: Supreme Court on Road Accident Victim Treatment Limitation Law | When Once the Time Has Begun to Run, Nothing Stops It: Supreme Court Section 14 of Limitation Act Shields Bona Fide Claimants: SC Validates Arbitration Amid Procedural Delay Time Lost Cannot Be Restored, But Justice Can: Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Convict Declared Juvenile Bailable Warrants in Domestic Violence Cases Only in Exceptional Circumstances - Domestic Violence Act Cases Are Primarily Remedial, Not Punitive: Supreme Court

Cruelties Committed by Appellant Rendered Respondent's Stay at Parental Home a Compulsion: Delhi High Court Upholds Dismissal of Marriage Dissolution Petition

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Delhi High Court's recent judgment in the case of Suman Kumar Bhan vs. Durga Bhan nee Haifz dealt with an appeal against the dismissal of a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) & (ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956. The court meticulously examined allegations of cruelty and desertion by the appellant, underlining the importance of substantiated evidence in such matrimonial disputes.

The appellant, Suman Kumar Bhan, appealed against the Family Court's decision, which dismissed his petition for dissolving the marriage with Durga Bhan. The primary issues revolved around allegations of non-disclosure of health issues, cruelty by the respondent, desertion, property disputes, and the long duration of separation since April 27, 2000.

Alleged Non-Disclosure and Health Issues: The court noted the appellant's claims of the respondent concealing her age and health condition, including a pre-marriage surgery. However, it found a lack of substantive evidence to support these claims, viewing them as cruelty towards the respondent.

Allegations of Cruelty: The appellant's accusations of mental and emotional cruelty, including dominance, refusal of sexual relations, and extra-marital affairs, were found unsubstantiated due to a lack of specific incidents or proof.

Desertion and Property Disputes: The court observed that the respondent's allegations of being forced out of the matrimonial home and disputes over property were compelling. The appellant failed to make efforts to bring the respondent back or seek restitution of conjugal rights, suggesting that the respondent's stay at her parent's house was due to the appellant's actions.

Duration of Separation: The significant separation period highlighted the irreparable breakdown of the marital bond, but it didn't justify dissolution of marriage on grounds of cruelty or desertion by the respondent.

Decision: The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's judgment. It concluded that the appellant's allegations were uncorroborated and amounted to cruelty towards the respondent, and the respondent's departure from the matrimonial home was due to the appellant's actions, not willful desertion.

Date of Decision: April 02, 2024.

Suman Kumar Bhan vs. Durga Bhan nee Haifz

 

Similar News