Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Coverage of Two Educational Institutions Under EPF Act Is Valid: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant decision, the Supreme Court of India has upheld the coverage of two educational institutions, managed by the same Society, under the Employees' Provident Fund (EPF) Act. The judgment, delivered on October 12, 2023, dismisses the appeal by M/s Mathosri Manikbai Kothari College of Visual Arts, challenging the applicability of the EPF Act.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, made several crucial observations:

  1. "There is financial integrity between the Society of the appellant as well as the Ideal Institute as substantial funds have been advanced to the Institutes by the Society."

  "Both the Institutes are functioning from the same premises."

  1. "Documents such as accreditation certificates, audit reports, and bank statements establish the connection between the establishments."

The judgment underscores the importance of functional integrity between establishments managed by the same entity for the purpose of coverage under the EPF Act. The Court emphasized the need for transparency and compliance with EPF regulations to ensure the welfare of employees.

The case revolved around M/s Mathosri Manikbai Kothari College of Visual Arts, which challenged the applicability of the EPF Act to its establishment. The dispute arose when the Enforcement Officer reported that a total of 26 employees were working in both the College and the Ideal Institute, managed by the same Society.

Despite the appellant's claims of independence between the institutions, the Court found compelling evidence of financial integration and geographic proximity. The Court also noted that both institutions received grants and were located on the same premises.

With this judgment, the Supreme Court has reaffirmed the principles governing the coverage of establishments under the EPF Act. The decision underscores the importance of transparency and adherence to EPF regulations in institutions managed by the same entity.

The judgment serves as a significant legal precedent for cases involving the applicability of the EPF Act to educational institutions and other establishments under common management.

Date of Decision: October 12, 2023

M/s MATHOSRI MANIKBAI KOTHARI   COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS vs THE ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND  COMMISSIONER

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/12-Oct-2023_MATHOSRI-MANIKBAI-Vs-Asst-PF-Commr.pdf"]

Similar News