Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute No Criminal Case Can Be Built on a Land Deal That’s Three Decades Old Without Specific Allegations: Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of FIR Against Ex-JK Housing Chief

"Court Quashes FIR Against Sukhbir Singh Badal, Observes 'No Evidence to Support Charges'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Punjab & Haryana High Court has quashed the FIR against Sukhbir Singh Badal, a well-known political leader and President of Shiromani Akali Dal. The Court observed that there was "no evidence to support charges" under various sections of the IPC and the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897.

Background

Sukhbir Singh Badal was accused of obstructing legal mining operations and threatening the staff of M/s Friends and Company. The FIR was registered under multiple sections, including 269, 270, 188, 341, 506 IPC 1860, and Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897. Badal argued that the FIR was politically motivated and that he had visited the site to investigate complaints of illegal mining.

The Court noted that the petitioner, a well-known political personality, had visited the mining site to verify complaints about illegal mining. "The Court found no evidence to support the charges under Sections 269, 270, 188, 341, 506 IPC, and Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897," the judgement read.

The Court highlighted the lack of evidence gathered by the prosecution. "Prosecution fails to gather any evidence of disobedience or wrongful restraint by the petitioner," the Court observed.

The Court also noted that Badal's visit to the site could not be considered a violation of any promulgation issued under the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, or the Disaster Management Act, 2006.

Given the lack of evidence and the peculiar facts and circumstances, the Court invoked its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC and quashed the FIR and all subsequent proceedings. "Given above, in the peculiar facts and circumstances, it is a fit case where the continuation of criminal proceedings shall amount to an abuse of the process of law," the judgement concluded.

 

D.D- August 24, 2023

Sukhbir Singh Badal vs State of Punjab and another                    

Similar News