Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Court Identifies Material Change in Circumstances": High Court Grants Second Bail to Accused in N.D.P.S. Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench has granted bail to Prem Paudel, who was accused under various sections of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act. The Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J., delivered the decision on October 4, 2023.

The bail has been granted in Paudel's second application after his initial bail application was rejected in May 2022. The Court cited "material change in circumstances" as a significant factor for reconsidering his bail application. "Detention of more than 6 years in this case and the release of the identically placed co-accused person namely Sita Nepali, in the considered opinion of this Court, are sufficient ground to infer material change in circumstances since rejection of first bail application," the Court noted in its observations.

Defense Counsel Piyush Kumar Singh argued that there had been a lack of compliance with the Section 50 of the NDPS Act, affecting the arrest and recovery process. He also highlighted the duration of Paudel's detention and the release of a similarly situated co-accused, Sita Nepali, as changes warranting the approval of the second bail application.

However, the counsel for the opposite party, Akhilesh Kumar Awasthi, opposed the bail application stating that Paudel's first bail application had already been rejected on merits and also pointed out that Paudel is a Nepali citizen, making it difficult to secure his presence for trial.

Despite opposition, the Court allowed the bail application with specific conditions, including the non-tampering with prosecution evidence and sincere cooperation in the trial. The Court also stated, "Presence of the applicant may also be secured before the trial court by placing adequate conditions/restrictions."

The ruling emphasizes that its observations are solely for the purpose of this bail application and should not be construed as a comment on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision:  4.10.2023

Prem Paudel vs Union Of India Thru. Intelligence Office N.C.B.   

Latest Legal News