Special Appeal Maintainable If Single Judge's Order Relates To Authority Acting Without Statutory Appellate Jurisdiction: Allahabad High Court Recall Of Witness For Cross-Examination Permissible On Newly Framed Issue Post-Remand Even If Disposal Timeline Is Fixed: Karnataka High Court Litigant Cannot Overcome Law Of Limitation By Shifting Blame On Counsel Through Inconsistent Stands: Madras High Court Cross-Cases Cannot Be Clubbed If Co-Accused In Complaint Case Is Absconding & Complainant Delayed Process: Allahabad High Court Preventive Detention Not Warranted If Person Can Be Dealt With Under Ordinary Laws; No Effort To Arrest In Pending Cases: Supreme Court Writ Petition Cannot Be Dismissed On ‘Forum Non Conveniens’ If Respondent's Office Is Within Court's Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Supreme Court Doubts 'Sajjan Singh' Ruling; Refers To Larger Bench Whether Third Judge Can Re-examine Unanimous Findings Under Section 392 CrPC SARFAESI Sale Vitiated If Balance 75% Bid Amount Is Paid Beyond 15 Days Without Written Extension Agreement: Supreme Court Delhi High Court Can't Refuse Writ Petition Against BSF Dismissal Merely Because Cause Of Action Arose Outside Delhi: Supreme Court Private Rights Must Yield To Public Interest: Andhra Pradesh High Court Directs Removal Of Encroachments On Public Road Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Re-Agitate Factual Disputes Or Seek Re-Hearing On Merits: Allahabad High Court Recovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act Vitiated If Police Already Present At Spot Before Arrival Of Panch Witnesses: Bombay High Court Mere Non-Compliance Or Delay In Procedure Under Section 52A NDPS Act Is An Irregularity, Not An Illegality Entitling Accused To Bail: Calcutta High Court Recovery Of Weapon Used In Commission Of Offence Not A Sine Qua Non For Conviction If Ocular Evidence Is Corroborated: Allahabad High Court Seized Vehicles Shouldn't Be Kept Idle To Rot In Police Stations, Utility Vanishes Due To Stagnation: Karnataka High Court Or 39 CPC | Trial Court Erred In Dismissing Injunction Application Despite Respondent's 'No Objection' To Restraining Share Transfer: Gauhati High Court Issuing NBW Merely For Absence Of Accused Already On Bail Is Improper; Liberty Cannot Be Dealt With Lightly: Orissa High Court 138 NI | Expert Examination Of Disputed Documents Essential For Just Adjudication If Complainant Denies Handwriting & Signatures: Rajasthan High Court Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Fill Lacunae In Evidence If Party Voluntarily Closed Evidence In Trial Court: Delhi High Court

Court Identifies Material Change in Circumstances": High Court Grants Second Bail to Accused in N.D.P.S. Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench has granted bail to Prem Paudel, who was accused under various sections of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act. The Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J., delivered the decision on October 4, 2023.

The bail has been granted in Paudel's second application after his initial bail application was rejected in May 2022. The Court cited "material change in circumstances" as a significant factor for reconsidering his bail application. "Detention of more than 6 years in this case and the release of the identically placed co-accused person namely Sita Nepali, in the considered opinion of this Court, are sufficient ground to infer material change in circumstances since rejection of first bail application," the Court noted in its observations.

Defense Counsel Piyush Kumar Singh argued that there had been a lack of compliance with the Section 50 of the NDPS Act, affecting the arrest and recovery process. He also highlighted the duration of Paudel's detention and the release of a similarly situated co-accused, Sita Nepali, as changes warranting the approval of the second bail application.

However, the counsel for the opposite party, Akhilesh Kumar Awasthi, opposed the bail application stating that Paudel's first bail application had already been rejected on merits and also pointed out that Paudel is a Nepali citizen, making it difficult to secure his presence for trial.

Despite opposition, the Court allowed the bail application with specific conditions, including the non-tampering with prosecution evidence and sincere cooperation in the trial. The Court also stated, "Presence of the applicant may also be secured before the trial court by placing adequate conditions/restrictions."

The ruling emphasizes that its observations are solely for the purpose of this bail application and should not be construed as a comment on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision:  4.10.2023

Prem Paudel vs Union Of India Thru. Intelligence Office N.C.B.   

Latest Legal News