Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Court Identifies Material Change in Circumstances": High Court Grants Second Bail to Accused in N.D.P.S. Act Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent ruling, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench has granted bail to Prem Paudel, who was accused under various sections of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act. The Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan, J., delivered the decision on October 4, 2023.

The bail has been granted in Paudel's second application after his initial bail application was rejected in May 2022. The Court cited "material change in circumstances" as a significant factor for reconsidering his bail application. "Detention of more than 6 years in this case and the release of the identically placed co-accused person namely Sita Nepali, in the considered opinion of this Court, are sufficient ground to infer material change in circumstances since rejection of first bail application," the Court noted in its observations.

Defense Counsel Piyush Kumar Singh argued that there had been a lack of compliance with the Section 50 of the NDPS Act, affecting the arrest and recovery process. He also highlighted the duration of Paudel's detention and the release of a similarly situated co-accused, Sita Nepali, as changes warranting the approval of the second bail application.

However, the counsel for the opposite party, Akhilesh Kumar Awasthi, opposed the bail application stating that Paudel's first bail application had already been rejected on merits and also pointed out that Paudel is a Nepali citizen, making it difficult to secure his presence for trial.

Despite opposition, the Court allowed the bail application with specific conditions, including the non-tampering with prosecution evidence and sincere cooperation in the trial. The Court also stated, "Presence of the applicant may also be secured before the trial court by placing adequate conditions/restrictions."

The ruling emphasizes that its observations are solely for the purpose of this bail application and should not be construed as a comment on the merits of the case.

Date of Decision:  4.10.2023

Prem Paudel vs Union Of India Thru. Intelligence Office N.C.B.   

Latest Legal News