Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Court Directs Release of ₹15,92,000 Seized in CGST Act Search, Citing Lack of Empowerment Under Section 67”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has directed the Commissioner of Goods and Services Tax (East) to release ₹15,92,000 that was seized during a search operation. The court observed that the seizure was not empowered under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST Act).

The bench, consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav, delivered the judgement on August 24, 2023. The petitioner, Rajeev Chhatwal, had filed the case seeking the release of the seized amount.

“The petitioner contends that the seizure was not empowered by the said section,” the court noted in its judgement. This observation was pivotal in the court’s decision to direct the respondent to “remit the amount seized to the petitioner’s bank account within a period of two weeks from today along with accrued interest.”

The petitioner was arrested along with two others, Asif Khan and Arjun Sharma, but was later released on bail. The respondent had alleged that the petitioner was involved in a racket of issuing fake invoices. However, the petitioner denied these allegations and claimed that he had signed various documents under coercion.

The court also referred to a recent decision in Deepak Khandelwal Proprietor M/s Shri Shyam Metal v. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi West & Anr.: 2023:DHC:5823-DB, which favored the petitioner’s claim regarding the seizure.

While the court has directed the release of the seized amount, it clarified that “the respondent is not precluded from taking any such steps or measures as available in accordance with law.”

This ruling sets an important precedent for cases involving seizures under the CGST Act and emphasizes the need for authorities to strictly adhere to the provisions of the law.

Date of Decision:  August 24, 2023

RAJEEV CHHATWAL vs COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND  SERVICES TAX (EAST)               

Latest Legal News