Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

Court Denies Interim Relief in Land Acquisition Case for Delhi-Katra Expressway Development

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Date: June 2, 2023

In a recent court order on case number CWP-11921-2023, the court has denied interim relief to the petitioners in a land acquisition dispute related to the development of the Punjab Section of the Delhi-Katra Expressway, including green field connectivity to Amritsar. The hearing took place on June 2, 2023, and the judgment was delivered by Justices Lisa Gill and Ritu Tagore.

The petitioners, represented by Mr. C.S. Bagri, Advocate, argued that their residential houses and certain other structures were being demolished without receiving supplementary compensation awards. The counsel for the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), represented by Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, provided information stating that only one residential house, belonging to Darshan Singh, had a portion falling within the alignment of the project, while the main structure was outside the alignment. The NHAI also claimed that supplementary awards had been passed for the boundary wall. Additionally, a table was presented in court showing that some petitioners had not made claims for certain structures, while awards had been passed for others in June/August 2022.

The petitioners’ counsel argued that they were not aware of any supplementary awards or compensation received for their structures and raised other objections challenging the acquisition itself. However, the court found no grounds to grant interim relief at this stage to halt the project.

The court, upon the request of the petitioners’ counsel, adjourned the case to July 10, 2023, for further proceedings.

Date: June 2, 2023

DARSHAN SINGH AND OTHERS VS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Document-1-29.pdf"]

Latest Legal News