Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

"Child Witnesses' Testimony Found Truthful, Consistent, and Natural": Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Murder and Kidnapping Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has upheld the conviction of Smt. Sangita Vilas Kiwade in a case involving the murder of a child, attempted murder of two others, kidnapping, and violation of the Bombay Money Lender's Act.

The judgment, delivered by the bench of Justices GAURI GODSE and REVATI MOHITE DERE on 4th July 2023, emphasized the credibility of the child witnesses. The court observed that the "evidence of 3 child witnesses i.e. Rohit, Rahul, and Anmol is truthful, consistent, and natural." [Para 20]

The incident occurred on 18th November 2010, where the appellant allegedly kidnapped four children and pushed three of them into a canal, resulting in the death of one child. The appellant was also accused of carrying out an illegal money-lending business.

The defense had argued that the child witnesses were tutored, but the court found no material contradictions in their testimony. The court further noted that the evidence on record "clearly reveals that the act of throwing three-year-old child Tejas into the canal was so imminently dangerous that the appellant had knowledge that, in all probabilities, it would cause his death." [Para 23]

The court also referred to the Supreme Court's observation in Pradeep Vs. The State of Maharashtra, emphasizing the importance of careful scrutiny of child witnesses' evidence.

The judgment confirmed the convictions under Section 363 of IPC (kidnapping), Section 302 of IPC (murder), and Section 32-B(b) of the Bombay Money Lending Act, dismissing the appeal.

The ruling underscores the importance of child witnesses' testimony in criminal cases and sets a precedent for the careful examination of such evidence.

 

Date of Decision: 4th JULY 2023

Yerwada Central Prison vs The State of Maharashtra 

Similar News