Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

"Child Witnesses' Testimony Found Truthful, Consistent, and Natural": Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Murder and Kidnapping Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has upheld the conviction of Smt. Sangita Vilas Kiwade in a case involving the murder of a child, attempted murder of two others, kidnapping, and violation of the Bombay Money Lender's Act.

The judgment, delivered by the bench of Justices GAURI GODSE and REVATI MOHITE DERE on 4th July 2023, emphasized the credibility of the child witnesses. The court observed that the "evidence of 3 child witnesses i.e. Rohit, Rahul, and Anmol is truthful, consistent, and natural." [Para 20]

The incident occurred on 18th November 2010, where the appellant allegedly kidnapped four children and pushed three of them into a canal, resulting in the death of one child. The appellant was also accused of carrying out an illegal money-lending business.

The defense had argued that the child witnesses were tutored, but the court found no material contradictions in their testimony. The court further noted that the evidence on record "clearly reveals that the act of throwing three-year-old child Tejas into the canal was so imminently dangerous that the appellant had knowledge that, in all probabilities, it would cause his death." [Para 23]

The court also referred to the Supreme Court's observation in Pradeep Vs. The State of Maharashtra, emphasizing the importance of careful scrutiny of child witnesses' evidence.

The judgment confirmed the convictions under Section 363 of IPC (kidnapping), Section 302 of IPC (murder), and Section 32-B(b) of the Bombay Money Lending Act, dismissing the appeal.

The ruling underscores the importance of child witnesses' testimony in criminal cases and sets a precedent for the careful examination of such evidence.

 

Date of Decision: 4th JULY 2023

Yerwada Central Prison vs The State of Maharashtra 

Latest Legal News