Non-Disclosure Of Medical Deformity While Seeking Re-Appointment Amounts To Deliberate Suppression, Termination Restored: Supreme Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Suit Based On Unregistered Gift Deed Not Maintainable; Plaint Liable For Rejection: Andhra Pradesh High Court Accused Has No Blanket Immunity From Re-Arrest If Initial Arrest Was Declared Illegal Only On Technical Grounds: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father’s Obligation To Maintain Minor Child Under Section 125 CrPC Is Absolute Even If Mother Is Also Earning: Uttarakhand High Court Variation In Physical Signature No Ground To Reject Bid If Submitted Via Secure Digital Signature Certificate: Orissa High Court Management Cannot Re-Examine Selection After Candidate Alters Position By Leaving Previous Job: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of E-Way Bills Not Proof Of Physical Movement Of Goods; GST Registration Can Be Cancelled For Fake ITC Claims: Madras High Court Employer Cannot Abuse Unequal Bargaining Power To Deny Back Wages For Period Of Eligibility: Supreme Court Restores Dues Of MSRTC Employee Entire Bank Account Of Educational Institution Cannot Be Frozen Merely Because It Received Fees From Accused Parent: Karnataka High Court CARA Must Facilitate Relocation Of Children Adopted Under HAMA; Cannot Abdicate Responsibility By Issuing Mere 'Support Letters': Delhi High Court Valid Caste Certificate Issued By Competent Authority Is Sine Qua Non To Establish Offence Under SC/ST Act: Chhattisgarh High Court Shifting Defense From 'No Transaction' To 'Transaction Not Proved' Prima Facie Shows Dishonest Intent Since Inception: Calcutta High Court Sugar Exports Under Specific Permission Cannot Be Treated As 'Restricted' To Deny RoDTEP Benefits: Bombay High Court Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Of Man Who Killed Bystander While Aiming At Another; Invokes 'Doctrine Of Transfer Of Malice' SDO Cannot Reclassify Public Utility Land To Grant Private Leases; Such Pattas Are Void Ab Initio: Supreme Court DNA Test Report Prevails Over Presumption Of Legitimacy Under Section 112 Evidence Act If Report Is Undisputed: Supreme Court Foreign Summary Judgment Passed After Refusing Leave To Defend Is Not 'On Merits' Under Section 13 CPC: Supreme Court Constitutional Safeguards Don’t End At Prison Gates: Supreme Court Extends Mandatory Disability Rights Directions To All States & UTs Courts Not Bound By Low Govt Rates For Prosthetic Limbs; Claimants Entitled To Choose Private Centres For 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Reject Plaint Over Insufficient Court Fee Without Giving Mandatory Opportunity To Correct Valuation: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders Immediate Removal Of Illegal Encroachments On National Highways; Bans New Dhabas Within Right Of Way

Cheque In Question Lost During Transit, Not A Ground to Dismiss Complaint Or  Adjourn  Matter Sine Die: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd. against Softech Computers, pertaining to a cheque dishonor case. The judgement, pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, emphasized the importance of proceeding with a trial despite the loss of the original cheque.

The petitioner sought to quash the orders passed by the lower courts, which declined to dismiss the complaint or adjourn the case sine die after the original cheque, crucial to the case, was lost in transit. The cheque, amounting to ₹28,00,092, was dishonored under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with the accused claiming no liability and denying the handwriting on the cheque.

In his ruling, Justice Gupta highlighted, "For the simple reason that the cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die." This statement underlines the court's position on the non-impact of the lost cheque on the continuation of the trial.

Further, the court observed that the cheque was dishonored with the remark “Payment Stopped by Drawer,” not for a mismatch of signatures. This detail played a crucial role in the court's decision to dismiss the petition.

The High Court's decision upholds the earlier observations made by the trial court. The trial court had noted that the lost document had been reconstructed and that photographs of the disputed signature were available with RFSL, Bhondsi Gurugram. This reconstruction was deemed sufficient for the trial to proceed.

Date of Decision : 15.12.2023

PG Micro System Private Ltd.  VS Softech Computers       

 

Latest Legal News