A Will That Silences Legal Heirs Without Cause Cannot Speak the Truth of the Testator’s Intent: Orissa High Court Rejects Solemnity of Registered Will Conviction Can Be Set Aside Even in Non-Compoundable Offences If Parties Settle: Punjab & Haryana High Court Affirms Inherent Power under Section 482 CrPC Mere Absence of Ticket or Station Report Not Fatal to Claim: Bombay High Court Says Railway Claims Can Be Proved by Circumstantial Evidence Judgment of Acquittal Cannot Be Reversed Merely Because A Different View Is Possible, Unless It’s Perverse Or Ignores Material Evidence: Himachal High Court Courts Cannot Reopen Admissions Once Deadline Expires: Orissa High Court Rejects SEBC Nursing Aspirants' Plea Filed Post Cut-Off A Sketchy Allegation of Corrupt Practice Can’t Be Cured Later Through Amendment: Bombay High Court Rejects Election Petition Against Shiv Sena MLA Delay in FIR, If Plausibly Explained, Cannot Vitiate Claim: Madras High Court Enhances Compensation to ₹3.26 Crores for Fatal Accident Involving Pillion Rider Failure to Videograph Search Violates BNSS: Allahabad High Court Grants Bail, Slams Police for Ignoring Procedural Mandates No Customs Duty Without Clear Authority Of Law: Supreme Court Quashes Levy On SEZ Electricity Supplied To Domestic Tariff Area Owner's Admission Cannot Be Brushed Aside to Deny Compensation: Supreme Court Reinstates ₹3.7 Lakh Award to Family of Deceased Driver Benefit Of Doubt Must Prevail Where Eyewitness Testimony Is Infirm And Contradict Medical Evidence: Supreme Court Acquits Double-Murder Convict A Mere Error in Bail Orders Cannot Tarnish a Judge’s Career: Supreme Court Quashes Dismissal of Judicial Officer for Granting Bail under Excise Act Order 1 Rule 10 CPC | A Necessary Party is One Without Whom No Order Can Be Made Effectively: Supreme Court Readiness and Willingness Must Be Proven—Mere Pleading Is Not Enough For Specific Performance: Supreme Court Returning Expired Stamp Papers Is No Refund in Law: Supreme Court Directs State to Pay ₹3.99 Lakhs Despite Limitation under UP Stamp Rules Supreme Court Distinguishes ‘Masterminds’ from ‘Facilitators’: Bail Denied to Umar Khalid & Sharjeel Imam, Granted to Gulfisha Fatima & Others: Supreme Court Jurisdiction of Small Causes Court Under Section 41 Does Not Extinguish Arbitration Clause in Leave and License Agreements: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Unilateral Appointment Void Ab Initio; Participation in Proceedings Does Not Constitute Waiver: Supreme Court Section 21 Arbitration Act Is Not a Gatekeeper of Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ₹2 Crore Arbitral Award Against Kerala Government

Cheque In Question Lost During Transit, Not A Ground to Dismiss Complaint Or  Adjourn  Matter Sine Die: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 In a significant ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by PG Micro System Private Ltd. against Softech Computers, pertaining to a cheque dishonor case. The judgement, pronounced by Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta, emphasized the importance of proceeding with a trial despite the loss of the original cheque.

The petitioner sought to quash the orders passed by the lower courts, which declined to dismiss the complaint or adjourn the case sine die after the original cheque, crucial to the case, was lost in transit. The cheque, amounting to ₹28,00,092, was dishonored under Sections 138 and 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, with the accused claiming no liability and denying the handwriting on the cheque.

In his ruling, Justice Gupta highlighted, "For the simple reason that the cheque in question has been lost during transit, cannot be a ground either to dismiss the complaint or to adjourn the matter sine die." This statement underlines the court's position on the non-impact of the lost cheque on the continuation of the trial.

Further, the court observed that the cheque was dishonored with the remark “Payment Stopped by Drawer,” not for a mismatch of signatures. This detail played a crucial role in the court's decision to dismiss the petition.

The High Court's decision upholds the earlier observations made by the trial court. The trial court had noted that the lost document had been reconstructed and that photographs of the disputed signature were available with RFSL, Bhondsi Gurugram. This reconstruction was deemed sufficient for the trial to proceed.

Date of Decision : 15.12.2023

PG Micro System Private Ltd.  VS Softech Computers       

 

Latest Legal News