Married Daughter Cannot Be Excluded From Compassionate Appointment Solely On The Ground Of Marriage: Chhattisgarh High Court Allahabad HC Condemns Lawyers Seeking Adjournments To Attend District Courts Inherent Powers Under Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Of Restitution Exists: Calcutta High Court Invoke Preventive Detention Laws Against Sand Mining Kingpins: Supreme Court Directs ED Probe To Protect Chambal Sanctuary Res Judicata Bars Pendente Lite Purchaser From Re-Agitating Impleadment Under Order XXII Rule 10 CPC If Rejected Under Order I Rule 10: Supreme Court Consumer Complaints Can Continue Against Promoters & Co-Developers Even If Corporate Debtor Is Under IBC Moratorium: Supreme Court IBC Moratorium Protects Only Corporate Debtor, Does Not Bar Consumer Complaints Against Promoters & Directors: Supreme Court Vehicle Registration Certificate Relevant But Not Conclusive For Deciding Interim Custody Under Section 451 CrPC: Supreme Court Lawyer Has No Unqualified Right To Continuous Presence During Entire Interrogation Under Section 38 BNSS: Supreme Court Mandating Continuous Videography Of Accused During Transit Is Unworkable, May Lead To Unfounded Allegations: Supreme Court Centre Introduces FCRA Amendment Bill 2026: Proposes Vesting Of Defunct NGO Assets In 'Designated Authority', Mandates Prior Nod For Probe Written Communication Of Grounds Of Arrest Not Mandatory For Arrests Prior To SC's 'Mihir Rajesh Shah' Judgment: Orissa High Court Passing Ex-Parte Maintenance Order Without Verifying Status Of WhatsApp Or Email Notice Violates Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court Training ChatGPT On Copyrighted News Is 'Fair Dealing', Does Not Amount To Infringement: Delhi High Court Refuses To Enjoin OpenAI Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rethinking Access to Justice: Proposing a Client-Choice Bar-Integrated Model as a Viable Alternative to the LADC System Delhi Police Grants Permission To Advocates To Protest At Jantar Mantar On August 7 Over LADC Concerns Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Central Government is the Appropriate Authority for Tata Memorial Centre: Bombay High Court Overturns Industrial Court Decision

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Bombay High Court declared, "Central Government is the appropriate authority for Tata Memorial Centre (TMC)", overturning the decision of the Industrial Court.

Legal Point: The High Court's decision focused on identifying the 'appropriate government' for Tata Memorial Centre (TMC) under the Industrial Disputes Act, post-amendment of 2010. The key question was whether TMC, an autonomous body, fell under the control of the Central or State Government for labor law purposes.

Facts and Issues: The Tata Memorial Centre filed petitions challenging the Industrial Court's decision, which held the State Government as the appropriate authority for TMC. The matter hinged on the interpretation of the amended Section 2(a)(i) of the Industrial Disputes Act. TMC, originally established by Sir Dorabjee Tata Trust, eventually came under the administrative and financial control of the Central Government. The High Court was tasked with determining if this control constituted TMC as an autonomous body under Central Government, post the 2010 amendment to the Industrial Disputes Act.

Administrative and Financial Control by Central Government: The court scrutinized evidence showing TMC's funding and control by the Department of Atomic Energy, a Central Government entity. The Centre's accounts are audited by government agencies, and key decisions, including pension schemes and salary structures, require Central Government approval.

Governing Council Composition: The composition of TMC's Governing Council, with significant representation from Central Government officials, indicated Central Government control.

Historical Context and Legal Interpretations: The court considered TMC's transition from a trust-run institution to one under Central Government, interpreting the term 'appropriate government' in light of the amended definition. The judgment distinguished between 'under the control of' and 'controlled by', leaning towards a broader understanding of control in the context of autonomous bodies.

Decision: The High Court declared the Central Government as the appropriate authority for TMC, setting aside the Industrial Court's decision. It held that complaints under the presumption of State Government control were not maintainable, directing the Tata Memorial Hospital Workers Union to initiate proceedings before the appropriate forum.

Date of Decision: 20 March 2024.

Tata Memorial Centre vs. Tata Memorial Hospital Workers Union and Others

Latest Legal News