Gratuity Is a Property Right, Not a Charity: MP High Court Upholds Gratuity Claims of Long-Term Contract Workers Seized Vehicles Must Not Be Left to Rot in Open Yards: Madras High Court Invokes Article 21, Orders Release of Vehicle Seized in Illegal Quarrying Case Even After Talaq And A Settlement, A Divorced Muslim Woman Can Claim Maintenance Under Section 125 CRPC: Kerala High Court Bail Cannot Be Withheld as Punishment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail to Govt Official in ₹200 Cr. Scholarship Scam Citing Delay and Article 21 Violation Custodial Interrogation Necessary in Serious Economic Offences: Delhi High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in ₹1.91 Cr Housing Scam Specific Relief Act | Readiness and Willingness Must Be Real and Continuous — Plaintiffs Cannot Withhold Funds and Blame the Seller: Bombay High Court Even If Claim Is Styled Under Section 163A, It Can Be Treated Under Section 166 If Negligence Is Pleaded And Higher Compensation Is Claimed: Supreme Court When Cheating Flows from One Criminal Conspiracy, the Law Does Not Demand 1852 FIRs: Supreme Court Upholds Single FIR in Multi-Crore Cheating Case Initiating Multiple FIRs on Same Facts is Impermissible: Supreme Court Quashes Parallel FIRs and Grants Bail Protection in Refund Case Not Every Middleman Is a Trafficker: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail in International Cyber Trafficking Case, Cites Absence of Mens Rea Stay in One Corner Freezes the Whole Map: Madras High Court Upholds Validity of Decades-Old Land Acquisition Despite 11-Year Delay in Award Parole Once Granted Cannot Be Made Illusory by Imposing Impossible Conditions: Rajasthan High Court Declares Mechanical Surety Requirement for Indigent Convicts Unconstitutional Once Acquisition Is Complete, Title Disputes Fall Outside Civil Court Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Appeal Lies Against Lok Adalat Compromise Decree Even on Grounds of Fraud: Orissa High Court Declares First Appeal Not Maintainable Sanction to Prosecute Under UAPA Cannot Be a Mechanical Act: Supreme Court Quashes Jharkhand Government’s Third-Time Sanction Without New Evidence FIRs in Corruption Cases Cannot Be Quashed on Hyper-Technical Grounds of Police Station Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Restores ACB Investigations Quashed by Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Completion of Ayurvedic Nursing Training Does Not Confer Right to Appointment: Supreme Court Rejects Legitimate Expectation Claim by Trainees University’s Error Can’t Cost a Student Her Future: Supreme Court Directs Manav Bharti University to Issue Withheld Degree and Marksheets Due to Clerical Mistake Disciplinary Exoneration Cannot Shield Public Servant from Criminal Trial in Corruption Cases: Supreme Court Customs Tariff Act | ‘End Use’ and ‘Common Parlance’ Tests Cannot Override Statutory Context: Supreme Court Classifies Mushroom Shelves as ‘Aluminium Structures’ Supreme Court Allows PIL Against Limited Maternity Benefits for Adoptive Mothers to Continue Under New Social Security Code Liberty Cannot Wait for Endless Trials: Supreme Court Grants Bail to Wadhawan Brothers in ₹57,000 Crore DHFL Scam Co-Sharer Has Superior Right of Pre-emption Even If Land Is Gair Mumkin Bara: Punjab & Haryana High Court Neighbours Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC Merely For Alleged Instigation: Karnataka High Court No Party Has a Right to Demand a Local Commissioner — It's Purely the Court’s Discretion: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Civil Revision

Central Administrative Tribunal Upholds Single Mother’s Claim for Transfer Exemption”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) delivered a landmark judgment, upholding the claim of a single mother seeking exemption from transfer. The case, OA No.1445/2023, was presided over by Hon’ble Dr. Chhabilendra Roul, Member (A), and the decision was pronounced on 7th July 2023.

The applicant, Kavita Dua, an esteemed TGT (Math) working at Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (KVS), was transferred from KV Rajokri, AFS, New Delhi to KV Koni, Kerala, by an order dated 13.09.2022. Subsequently, her representation for the cancellation of the transfer was turned down in an order dated 23.03.2023.

In an unprecedented move, the Tribunal, while examining the case, took cognizance of the applicant’s plea that she is a single mother facing various personal difficulties. The Tribunal observed that the order dated 23.03.2023 lacked reasoning, failing to address the applicant’s grievance properly. Furthermore, it was brought to light that other employees belonging to specific categories, under the KVS Transfer Policy Guidelines 2021, were granted exemption from transfer, raising concerns of discrimination.

Counsel for the applicant, Advocate Karanjot Singh Mainee, argued that the applicant’s status as a single mother was not given due consideration, violating the principle of equality under Article 14 of the Constitution of India. On the other hand, respondents, represented by Advocate Mr. S. Rajappa, contended that the transfer was based on the rationalization/redistribution policy, denying any bias or malafide intentions.

The CAT, taking note of precedents, clarified that while personal hardships are valid for consideration, they are not grounds for the courts or tribunals to decide transfer matters. Instead, the administrative authorities are tasked with making the final decisions, taking into account genuine hardships to ensure good and efficient administration.

In a significant development, the Tribunal ordered the respondents to provide a fresh opportunity for the applicant to be heard. The applicant was directed to provide documentary evidence substantiating her single mother status, as well as the frequency of her family court appearances. The respondents were mandated to consider her representation within 15 days of submission.

The ruling sets a precedent for single mothers in the Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and other similar institutions, recognizing their unique challenges and seeking to address them in a just and equitable manner.

“The present applicant deserves to be considered for exemption from transfer treating her de facto a single mother based on the principle of equality as enumerated under Article 14 of the Constitution of India.”

This verdict emphasizes the importance of considering personal difficulties and ensuring fair treatment for employees with distinct circumstances. The decision showcases the judiciary’s commitment to uphold constitutional rights and promote fairness in administrative decisions.

Date of Decision: 07July 2023

Kavita Dua vs The Commissioner

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Kavita_Dua_vs_Kvs_on_7_July_2023_CAT.pdf"]

Latest Legal News