Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Ceiling Act, an Expropriatory Legislation, is to be Strictly Construed: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has pronounced that the Ceiling Act, described as an "expropriatory legislation," must be interpreted with utmost strictness. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Justice Dipankar Datta on October 9, 2023.

The case in question revolved around the interpretation of Section 2(q)(i) of the Ceiling Act and its application in the context of expropriatory legislation. The Court noted a discrepancy in various decisions related to this issue and emphasized the need for a strict interpretation of the Ceiling Act, considering its expropriatory nature.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "Ceiling Act, an expropriatory legislation, is to be strictly construed."

The Court further examined the payment under Section 11 of the Ceiling Act and pointed out that it should not be based solely on the fair market value. The importance of the words "in an area" in Section 2(g) and 2(q) of the Act was also highlighted.

Due to the significance of the issues raised in the case, the Court referred the matter to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for appropriate directions, indicating the need for authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.

This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications on the interpretation and application of the Ceiling Act in land-related matters. It provides valuable guidance on how expropriatory legislations should be construed by the courts.

Prominent advocates, including Shri Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, and Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents, were involved in presenting their arguments before the Supreme Court.

Date of Decision: October 9, 2023

M/s. Kewal Court Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.  vs The State of West Bengal and Ors.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-KEWAL-COURT-PVT-LTD-Vs-State-WB.pdf"]

Latest Legal News