Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court 'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Ceiling Act, an Expropriatory Legislation, is to be Strictly Construed: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has pronounced that the Ceiling Act, described as an "expropriatory legislation," must be interpreted with utmost strictness. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Justice Dipankar Datta on October 9, 2023.

The case in question revolved around the interpretation of Section 2(q)(i) of the Ceiling Act and its application in the context of expropriatory legislation. The Court noted a discrepancy in various decisions related to this issue and emphasized the need for a strict interpretation of the Ceiling Act, considering its expropriatory nature.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "Ceiling Act, an expropriatory legislation, is to be strictly construed."

The Court further examined the payment under Section 11 of the Ceiling Act and pointed out that it should not be based solely on the fair market value. The importance of the words "in an area" in Section 2(g) and 2(q) of the Act was also highlighted.

Due to the significance of the issues raised in the case, the Court referred the matter to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for appropriate directions, indicating the need for authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.

This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications on the interpretation and application of the Ceiling Act in land-related matters. It provides valuable guidance on how expropriatory legislations should be construed by the courts.

Prominent advocates, including Shri Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, and Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents, were involved in presenting their arguments before the Supreme Court.

Date of Decision: October 9, 2023

M/s. Kewal Court Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.  vs The State of West Bengal and Ors.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-KEWAL-COURT-PVT-LTD-Vs-State-WB.pdf"]

Latest Legal News