Appellate Court Must Re-Appreciate Evidence To Determine Lesser Offence Under Section 386 CrPC If Graver Charge Is Not Sustained: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Provisions Override Other Laws Including Principles Of Res Judicata: Supreme Court Right To Information Act | CCTV Footage Cannot Be Provided Directly To Applicant If It Falls Under Section 8(1)(g) Exemptions: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is The Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inefficient Case Management By State Law Officers Impedes Justice: Allahabad High Court Directs Principal Secretary (Law) To Reform Procedures Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is A Primary Consideration For Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings, But Virtual Appearance Can Mitigate Hardship: Andhra Pradesh High Court Son Cannot Claim Co-Ownership Or Resist Eviction Based On Alleged Financial Contribution To Property Purchased In Mother’s Name: Delhi High Court Order 33 Rule 1 CPC | Applicant Must Prove Inability To Pay Court Fee With Cogent Evidence; Mere Assertion Of Indigence Is Insufficient: Chhattisgarh High Court Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right To Possession, Cannot Rely Solely On Lacunae In Defendant’s Evidence: Delhi High Court Successor Cannot Remain Silent: Bombay High Court Upholds Tenant's Right To Purchase Agricultural Land, Rules Rejection Before 1961 Amendment No Bar Single Mother Has Right To Determine Child’s Surname And Alter Biological Father's Name In Birth Certificate: Calcutta High Court Court Can Sanction Professional Fees Of Valuers Exceeding Prescribed Ceiling Post-Assignment: Bombay High Court MACT | Appellate Court Can Reduce Compensation Even If Insurer’s Appeal Challenges Quantum While Claimant Seeks Enhancement: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Written Statement To Correct Internal Inconsistencies Does Not Amount To Withdrawal Of Admission: Delhi High Court Oral Family Partition Valid Even If Unregistered: Jharkhand High Court Power Of Attorney Lacking Explicit Interest Is Revocable Regardless Of 'Irrevocable' Label: Gujarat High Court DRC Act | Summary Eviction Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Extended Litigation By Seeking To File Additional Documents Post-Pleadings: Delhi High Court Financial Institutions Cannot Use 'Goonda-ism' For Repossession: Supreme Court Mandates Compensation For Violation Of Article 21 Motor Vehicles Act: Claimant Cannot Invoke Jurisdiction Of A Forum Where Neither Accident Occurred Nor Defendant Resides: Supreme Court Article 226 | Writ Court Cannot Decide Title Disputes Or Protect Possession If Factual Matrix Is Disputed: Supreme Court Suppression Of Material Facts In Writ Petition Under Article 32 Renders Challenge Non-Maintainable: Supreme Court

Ceiling Act, an Expropriatory Legislation, is to be Strictly Construed: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has pronounced that the Ceiling Act, described as an "expropriatory legislation," must be interpreted with utmost strictness. The judgment was delivered by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice Surya Kant and Hon'ble Justice Dipankar Datta on October 9, 2023.

The case in question revolved around the interpretation of Section 2(q)(i) of the Ceiling Act and its application in the context of expropriatory legislation. The Court noted a discrepancy in various decisions related to this issue and emphasized the need for a strict interpretation of the Ceiling Act, considering its expropriatory nature.

In the judgment, the Court observed, "Ceiling Act, an expropriatory legislation, is to be strictly construed."

The Court further examined the payment under Section 11 of the Ceiling Act and pointed out that it should not be based solely on the fair market value. The importance of the words "in an area" in Section 2(g) and 2(q) of the Act was also highlighted.

Due to the significance of the issues raised in the case, the Court referred the matter to the Hon'ble Chief Justice for appropriate directions, indicating the need for authoritative determination of related issues by a Larger Bench.

This ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications on the interpretation and application of the Ceiling Act in land-related matters. It provides valuable guidance on how expropriatory legislations should be construed by the courts.

Prominent advocates, including Shri Jaideep Gupta, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants, and Shri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned Senior Counsel for the respondents, were involved in presenting their arguments before the Supreme Court.

Date of Decision: October 9, 2023

M/s. Kewal Court Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.  vs The State of West Bengal and Ors.

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/09-Oct-2023-KEWAL-COURT-PVT-LTD-Vs-State-WB.pdf"]

Latest Legal News