Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Once a Court Declares a Department an Industry Under Section 2(j), State Cannot Raise the Same Objection Again: Gujarat High Court Slams Repetitive Litigation by Irrigation Department “How Could Cheques Issued in 2020 Be Mentioned in a 2019 Contract?”: Delhi High Court Grants Injunction in Forged MOA Case, Slams Prima Facie Fabrication Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC Sole Testimony of Prosecutrix, If Credible, Is Enough to Convict: Delhi High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Cheque Issued as Security Still Attracts Section 138 NI Act If Liability Exists on Date of Presentation: Himachal Pradesh High Court No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity Law of Limitation Binds All Equally, Including the State: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Review Petition with 5743 Days’ Delay Once Selected, All Are Equals: Allahabad High Court Slams State for Withholding Pay Protection From Later Batches of Ex-Servicemen Constables Non-Compliance With Section 42 of NDPS Act Is Fatal to Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court Acquits Two Accused In 160 Kg Poppy Husk Case Unregistered Agreement Creating Right of Way Inadmissible in Evidence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Summary Decree in Partition Suit Denied: Unequivocal Admissions Absent, Full Trial Necessary: Delhi High Court No Court Can Allow Itself to Be Used as an Instrument of Fraud: Delhi High Court Exposes Forged Writ Petition Filed in Name of Unaware Citizen "Deliberate Wage Splitting to Evade Provident Fund Dues Is Illegal": Bombay High Court Restores PF Authority's 7A Order Against Saket College and Centrum Direct Anti-Suit Injunction in Matrimonial Dispute Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Refuses to Stall UK Divorce Proceedings Filed by Wife

CCTV and ID Cards Mandatory for Recreational Clubs, No License Needed for Legal Activities: Karnataka High Court

09 December 2024 8:02 PM

By: sayum


 In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court at Dharwad, led by Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum, addressed the contentious issue of licensing requirements for recreational clubs. The court's decision mandates specific compliance measures, such as the installation of CCTV cameras and issuance of ID cards, while affirming that lawful activities within such clubs do not require licenses under the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. This judgment, delivered on May 27, 2024, delineates the responsibilities and rights of recreational clubs and the jurisdictional police, aiming to balance regulatory oversight with the freedom to conduct legal recreational activities.

The petitioner, Sri Harsha Recreation and Association, is a registered society under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, operating a recreation club that offers games like chess, darts, rummy, carom, video games, electronic amusement games, and dice games. The club's membership is exclusive, restricting access to its members only. The petitioner approached the High Court seeking relief from the police's insistence on obtaining a license to conduct these activities, which they argued were not covered under Sections 6 and 7 of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963.

The petitioner contended that the recreational activities in question do not fall under the licensing provisions of the Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The court, referencing the earlier decision in W.A.No.728/2020, agreed with this position but emphasized the need for regulatory measures to ensure lawful conduct within the club's premises.

The court directed the petitioner to install CCTV cameras at all access points and areas where games are played. The footage must be maintained for at least 15 days and made available to the jurisdictional police upon request. This measure aims to enhance transparency and accountability, ensuring that the club's activities remain within legal bounds.

The court mandated the issuance of identity cards to all club members. These cards must be presented during police raids or surveillance operations, facilitating easy identification and verification of authorized individuals.

To prevent unauthorized access, the court ruled that non-members and guests cannot utilize the club's facilities for playing games or engaging in recreational activities. This restriction aims to maintain the exclusivity of the club's membership and prevent potential misuse by outsiders.

The judgment explicitly prohibits any activities that fall under Sections 2(14) and 2(15) of the Karnataka Police Act, 1863, or involve games of chance with stakes. The club must implement mechanisms to ensure compliance with this directive. Any violation detected by the police can result in legal action against both the club and the offenders.

The jurisdictional police are granted the authority to conduct periodic inspections and act on any information suggesting unlawful activities within the club. This provision ensures continuous oversight and swift action against any infractions.

The court directed the police not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities of the club members, provided all conditions are met. This protects the club's right to conduct legal activities without undue harassment or interruption.

The court also emphasized the necessity of adhering to COVID-19 safety protocols, including social distancing, use of sanitizers, and wearing masks during all activities within the club premises.

The Karnataka High Court's ruling clarifies the licensing requirements for recreational clubs and establishes a framework for lawful operations. By mandating CCTV surveillance and member identification, the court aims to ensure transparency and prevent illegal activities. This judgment serves as a precedent for similar cases, balancing regulatory oversight with the protection of lawful recreational activities.

Date of Decision: May 27, 2024

Latest Legal News