Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

CBI cannot be flooded with cases; local police are capable of investigating complex conspiracies:  Delhi HC Transfers Investigation Into Mysterious Death to Crime Branch

02 October 2024 8:13 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court in W.P.(CRL) 710/2024 transferred the investigation into the death of Kartik Gandhi to the Delhi Crime Branch. The petitioner, Kartik's mother, Geeta Gandhi, had sought a CBI investigation, alleging that her son was murdered as part of a conspiracy over property disputes. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma rejected the CBI probe but ordered a fresh, thorough investigation by the Crime Branch, emphasizing the need for justice and transparency.

The petitioner alleged that her son, Kartik Gandhi, was murdered by a group of individuals involved in a long-standing property dispute with her. Kartik had traveled to Leh with one of the suspects, Aditya Singh, in December 2023, and was critically injured in a car accident there. Although he survived initially, Kartik succumbed to his injuries on January 15, 2024. The petitioner accused the suspects, including Aditya Singh, of orchestrating the accident to pressure her into selling her property. She further claimed that Kartik had been manipulated and framed in multiple legal cases as part of a conspiracy against her.

The primary issue was whether the case warranted a CBI investigation due to the alleged interstate conspiracy and the petitioner’s claim of bias against the local police. The Court acknowledged that a fair investigation is a constitutional right but ruled that the Delhi Police could conduct the investigation, as they had handled equally sensitive cases in the past.

Justice Sharma cited Supreme Court precedents, emphasizing that CBI investigations should only be ordered in exceptional circumstances. The Court found that transferring the case to the Crime Branch would address the petitioner’s concerns without overburdening the CBI.

The Court rejected the petitioner’s plea for a CBI probe, noting that the case did not involve national or international ramifications. However, the Court transferred the investigation from Nubra Police in Leh to the Crime Branch in Delhi, directing them to conduct a de novo inquiry, including allegations of conspiracy and manipulation of evidence. The Crime Branch was instructed to add any necessary legal provisions based on their findings.

The Delhi High Court’s ruling balances the petitioner’s demand for a thorough investigation with the judicial principle of sparingly using CBI’s resources. By transferring the case to the Crime Branch, the Court ensured that the allegations would be rigorously examined while maintaining the integrity of local law enforcement.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Geeta Gandhi v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. (

Similar News