MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

CBI cannot be flooded with cases; local police are capable of investigating complex conspiracies:  Delhi HC Transfers Investigation Into Mysterious Death to Crime Branch

02 October 2024 8:13 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court in W.P.(CRL) 710/2024 transferred the investigation into the death of Kartik Gandhi to the Delhi Crime Branch. The petitioner, Kartik's mother, Geeta Gandhi, had sought a CBI investigation, alleging that her son was murdered as part of a conspiracy over property disputes. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma rejected the CBI probe but ordered a fresh, thorough investigation by the Crime Branch, emphasizing the need for justice and transparency.

The petitioner alleged that her son, Kartik Gandhi, was murdered by a group of individuals involved in a long-standing property dispute with her. Kartik had traveled to Leh with one of the suspects, Aditya Singh, in December 2023, and was critically injured in a car accident there. Although he survived initially, Kartik succumbed to his injuries on January 15, 2024. The petitioner accused the suspects, including Aditya Singh, of orchestrating the accident to pressure her into selling her property. She further claimed that Kartik had been manipulated and framed in multiple legal cases as part of a conspiracy against her.

The primary issue was whether the case warranted a CBI investigation due to the alleged interstate conspiracy and the petitioner’s claim of bias against the local police. The Court acknowledged that a fair investigation is a constitutional right but ruled that the Delhi Police could conduct the investigation, as they had handled equally sensitive cases in the past.

Justice Sharma cited Supreme Court precedents, emphasizing that CBI investigations should only be ordered in exceptional circumstances. The Court found that transferring the case to the Crime Branch would address the petitioner’s concerns without overburdening the CBI.

The Court rejected the petitioner’s plea for a CBI probe, noting that the case did not involve national or international ramifications. However, the Court transferred the investigation from Nubra Police in Leh to the Crime Branch in Delhi, directing them to conduct a de novo inquiry, including allegations of conspiracy and manipulation of evidence. The Crime Branch was instructed to add any necessary legal provisions based on their findings.

The Delhi High Court’s ruling balances the petitioner’s demand for a thorough investigation with the judicial principle of sparingly using CBI’s resources. By transferring the case to the Crime Branch, the Court ensured that the allegations would be rigorously examined while maintaining the integrity of local law enforcement.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Geeta Gandhi v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. (

Latest Legal News