IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process

CBI cannot be flooded with cases; local police are capable of investigating complex conspiracies:  Delhi HC Transfers Investigation Into Mysterious Death to Crime Branch

02 October 2024 8:13 PM

By: sayum


Delhi High Court in W.P.(CRL) 710/2024 transferred the investigation into the death of Kartik Gandhi to the Delhi Crime Branch. The petitioner, Kartik's mother, Geeta Gandhi, had sought a CBI investigation, alleging that her son was murdered as part of a conspiracy over property disputes. Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma rejected the CBI probe but ordered a fresh, thorough investigation by the Crime Branch, emphasizing the need for justice and transparency.

The petitioner alleged that her son, Kartik Gandhi, was murdered by a group of individuals involved in a long-standing property dispute with her. Kartik had traveled to Leh with one of the suspects, Aditya Singh, in December 2023, and was critically injured in a car accident there. Although he survived initially, Kartik succumbed to his injuries on January 15, 2024. The petitioner accused the suspects, including Aditya Singh, of orchestrating the accident to pressure her into selling her property. She further claimed that Kartik had been manipulated and framed in multiple legal cases as part of a conspiracy against her.

The primary issue was whether the case warranted a CBI investigation due to the alleged interstate conspiracy and the petitioner’s claim of bias against the local police. The Court acknowledged that a fair investigation is a constitutional right but ruled that the Delhi Police could conduct the investigation, as they had handled equally sensitive cases in the past.

Justice Sharma cited Supreme Court precedents, emphasizing that CBI investigations should only be ordered in exceptional circumstances. The Court found that transferring the case to the Crime Branch would address the petitioner’s concerns without overburdening the CBI.

The Court rejected the petitioner’s plea for a CBI probe, noting that the case did not involve national or international ramifications. However, the Court transferred the investigation from Nubra Police in Leh to the Crime Branch in Delhi, directing them to conduct a de novo inquiry, including allegations of conspiracy and manipulation of evidence. The Crime Branch was instructed to add any necessary legal provisions based on their findings.

The Delhi High Court’s ruling balances the petitioner’s demand for a thorough investigation with the judicial principle of sparingly using CBI’s resources. By transferring the case to the Crime Branch, the Court ensured that the allegations would be rigorously examined while maintaining the integrity of local law enforcement.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Geeta Gandhi v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr. (

Similar News