IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court Limitation | Litigants Cannot Entirely Blame Advocates for Procedural Delays: Supreme Court Family's Criminal Past Cannot Dictate Passport Eligibility: Madhya Pradesh High Court Double Presumption of Innocence Bolsters Acquittal When Evidence Falls Short: Calcutta High Court Upholds Essential Commodities Act TIP Not Mandatory if Witness Testimony  Credible - Recovery of Weapon Not Essential for Conviction Under Section 397 IPC: Delhi High Court University’s Failure to Amend Statutes for EWS Reservation Renders Advertisement Unsustainable: High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh Quashes EWS Reservation in University Recruitment Process Seniority Must Be Calculated From the Date of Initial Appointment, Not Regularization: Madras High Court Rules Section 319 Cr.P.C. | Mere Association Not Enough for Criminal Liability: Karnataka HC Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Per Kanal Compensation for Land Acquired for Nangal-Talwara Railway Line, Dismisses Railway’s Appeal No Work No Pay Principle Not Applicable: Orissa High Court Orders Reinstatement and Full Back Wages for Wrongfully Terminated Lecturer No Assault, No Obstruction, Only Words Exchanged: Bombay High Court Quashes Charges of Obstruction Against Advocates Under Section 353 IPC Matrimonial Offences Can Be Quashed Even if Non-Compoundable, When Genuine Compromise Is Reached: J&K HC Plaintiff Entitled to Partition, But Must Contribute Redemption Share to Defendant: Delhi High Court Clarifies Subrogation Rights in Mortgage Redemption Labeling Someone A 'Rowdy' Without Convictions Infringes Personal Liberty And Reputation: Kerala High Court

Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection

27 September 2024 3:48 PM

By: sayum


Today, the Kerala High Court in WP(C) No. 26132 of 2024 upheld the disqualification of four members of East Eleri Grama Panchayat under the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999. The court ruled that the petitioners, who contested elections using the Revolutionary Marxist Party of India (RMPI)’s symbol, were rightly disqualified by the Kerala State Election Commission for defying a party directive and supporting a rival candidate.

The case originated after the 2020 General Election to Local Self-Government Institutions in Kerala, where the petitioners contested as candidates in East Eleri Grama Panchayat using RMPI’s symbol, "Football." Following the election, the Indian National Congress (INC) and RMPI formed an alliance to elect a Panchayat President. However, the petitioners supported a rival candidate, violating the RMPI’s whip, leading to the Election Commission's disqualification order on July 2, 2024.

The primary legal issue was whether the petitioners were bound by RMPI's directives despite their claim of being independent candidates. The court examined whether the use of RMPI’s symbol made them members of the party, which subjected them to the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act.

The petitioners contended that they were independents under the Democratic Development Front (DDF), and the symbol "Football" was used merely out of convenience, not as RMPI members. However, the Election Commission determined that the petitioners were deemed RMPI members as they had used its symbol, supported by letters from RMPI’s State Secretary.

The High Court dismissed the petitioners' claims, holding that the use of RMPI's symbol placed them under the party’s purview. According to the Local Authorities Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 2017, when a political party recommends its symbol to a candidate, that candidate is "deemed to be set up by the political party"​.

Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. emphasized that the Election Commission’s finding was consistent with the law. The court ruled that the petitioners’ act of supporting a rival candidate despite RMPI's instructions amounted to voluntary defection, invoking disqualification under Section 3 of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act​.

The Kerala High Court validated the disqualification order by the Election Commission, reinforcing the principle that candidates who contest using a political party’s symbol are bound by its directives. The court's ruling underscores the stringent application of anti-defection laws in local body elections.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Jiji Thomas and Others vs Kerala State Election Commission and Joseph Mutholi

 

Similar News