No Work No Pay: Delhi High Court Denies Back Wages To Reinstated Army Officer State Cannot Use 'Delay & Laches' To Evade Compensation For Land Taken Without Authority Of Law: Calcutta High Court Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Jail Appeal Solely On 3157-Day Delay; Orders Release Of Life Convict After 22 Years In Jail 138 NI Act | Failure To Produce Income Tax Returns Not Fatal To Cheque Bounce Case If Debt Is Established: Delhi High Court Certified Copies Of Public Records Not In Party's 'Power Or Possession' Until Actually Obtained; Leave Not Required For Rebuttal Documents: AP High Court For Conviction Under Section 34 IPC, Prosecution Must Establish Prior Meeting Of Minds & Pre-Arranged Plan: Allahabad High Court Merciless Beating With Blunt Side Of Deadly Weapons To Spread Terror Constitutes Murder, Not Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court CIT Can’t Invoke Revisionary Jurisdiction Merely Because AO’s Enquiry Was ‘Inadequate’ If View Is Plausible: Bombay High Court Mere Presence At Crime Scene Without Proof Of Prior Concert Insufficient To Invoke Section 34 IPC For Murder: Supreme Court Courts Cannot Be Used As Tools For Coercion: Bombay HC Dismisses Application To Implead Developer Without Contractual Nexus, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Cost Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted For Contingent Contracts Dependent On Third-Party Conveyance: Madras High Court Unlawful Subletting Is A ‘Continuing Wrong’, Fresh Limitation Period Runs As Long As Breach Continues: Bombay High Court Courts Must Specify Payment Timeline In Specific Performance Decrees; Order XX Rule 12A CPC Is Mandatory: Supreme Court Specific Performance Decree Does Not Automatically Rescind Due To Delay; Courts Can Extend Time For Deposit: Supreme Court Madras High Court Quashes Forgery Case Against Mahindra World City After Victims Accept Alternate Land In Settlement Motor Accident Claims: 13-Day FIR Delay Not Fatal; 80% Physical Disability Can Be Treated As 100% Functional Disability: Punjab & Haryana HC Murderer Cannot Inherit Property From Victim Through Wills; Section 25 Hindu Succession Act Bar Applies To Testamentary Succession: Supreme Court Courts Must Pierce Veil Of Clever Drafting To Reject Suits Barred By Benami Law; 2016 Amendments Are Retrospective: Supreme Court Indian Railways Is A Consumer, Not A Deemed Distribution Licensee; Must Pay Cross-Subsidy Surcharge For Open Access: Supreme Court Technical Rules Of Evidence Act Do Not Apply To Departmental Enquiries: Supreme Court Public Employment Cannot Be Converted Into An Instrument Of Fraud; Police Personnel Using Dual Identity Strikes At Root Of Service: Supreme Court

Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection

27 September 2024 3:48 PM

By: sayum


Today, the Kerala High Court in WP(C) No. 26132 of 2024 upheld the disqualification of four members of East Eleri Grama Panchayat under the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999. The court ruled that the petitioners, who contested elections using the Revolutionary Marxist Party of India (RMPI)’s symbol, were rightly disqualified by the Kerala State Election Commission for defying a party directive and supporting a rival candidate.

The case originated after the 2020 General Election to Local Self-Government Institutions in Kerala, where the petitioners contested as candidates in East Eleri Grama Panchayat using RMPI’s symbol, "Football." Following the election, the Indian National Congress (INC) and RMPI formed an alliance to elect a Panchayat President. However, the petitioners supported a rival candidate, violating the RMPI’s whip, leading to the Election Commission's disqualification order on July 2, 2024.

The primary legal issue was whether the petitioners were bound by RMPI's directives despite their claim of being independent candidates. The court examined whether the use of RMPI’s symbol made them members of the party, which subjected them to the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act.

The petitioners contended that they were independents under the Democratic Development Front (DDF), and the symbol "Football" was used merely out of convenience, not as RMPI members. However, the Election Commission determined that the petitioners were deemed RMPI members as they had used its symbol, supported by letters from RMPI’s State Secretary.

The High Court dismissed the petitioners' claims, holding that the use of RMPI's symbol placed them under the party’s purview. According to the Local Authorities Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 2017, when a political party recommends its symbol to a candidate, that candidate is "deemed to be set up by the political party"​.

Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. emphasized that the Election Commission’s finding was consistent with the law. The court ruled that the petitioners’ act of supporting a rival candidate despite RMPI's instructions amounted to voluntary defection, invoking disqualification under Section 3 of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act​.

The Kerala High Court validated the disqualification order by the Election Commission, reinforcing the principle that candidates who contest using a political party’s symbol are bound by its directives. The court's ruling underscores the stringent application of anti-defection laws in local body elections.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Jiji Thomas and Others vs Kerala State Election Commission and Joseph Mutholi

 

Latest Legal News