Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Candidates who use a party’s symbol must be deemed members of that party: Kerala High Court Upholds Disqualification for Defection

27 September 2024 3:48 PM

By: sayum


Today, the Kerala High Court in WP(C) No. 26132 of 2024 upheld the disqualification of four members of East Eleri Grama Panchayat under the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act, 1999. The court ruled that the petitioners, who contested elections using the Revolutionary Marxist Party of India (RMPI)’s symbol, were rightly disqualified by the Kerala State Election Commission for defying a party directive and supporting a rival candidate.

The case originated after the 2020 General Election to Local Self-Government Institutions in Kerala, where the petitioners contested as candidates in East Eleri Grama Panchayat using RMPI’s symbol, "Football." Following the election, the Indian National Congress (INC) and RMPI formed an alliance to elect a Panchayat President. However, the petitioners supported a rival candidate, violating the RMPI’s whip, leading to the Election Commission's disqualification order on July 2, 2024.

The primary legal issue was whether the petitioners were bound by RMPI's directives despite their claim of being independent candidates. The court examined whether the use of RMPI’s symbol made them members of the party, which subjected them to the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act.

The petitioners contended that they were independents under the Democratic Development Front (DDF), and the symbol "Football" was used merely out of convenience, not as RMPI members. However, the Election Commission determined that the petitioners were deemed RMPI members as they had used its symbol, supported by letters from RMPI’s State Secretary.

The High Court dismissed the petitioners' claims, holding that the use of RMPI's symbol placed them under the party’s purview. According to the Local Authorities Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 2017, when a political party recommends its symbol to a candidate, that candidate is "deemed to be set up by the political party"​.

Justice Mohammed Nias C.P. emphasized that the Election Commission’s finding was consistent with the law. The court ruled that the petitioners’ act of supporting a rival candidate despite RMPI's instructions amounted to voluntary defection, invoking disqualification under Section 3 of the Kerala Local Authorities (Prohibition of Defection) Act​.

The Kerala High Court validated the disqualification order by the Election Commission, reinforcing the principle that candidates who contest using a political party’s symbol are bound by its directives. The court's ruling underscores the stringent application of anti-defection laws in local body elections.

Date of Decision: September 26, 2024

Jiji Thomas and Others vs Kerala State Election Commission and Joseph Mutholi

 

Latest Legal News