Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Calcutta High Court Refused to Quash Trial Under NDPS Act Against Ex-CPI(M) Leader – Prima Facie Case Made Out.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court, presided over by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul), delivered a verdict affirming the continuation of proceedings in a high-profile narcotics case. The judgment, issued on August 29, 2023, dismisses the petitioner's plea to quash the case and orders the trial to proceed.

The case, CRR 2066 of 2019, revolves around allegations of involvement in storing and transporting contraband under Sections 8(c), 15(c), and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner, Ashadullah Biswas, sought to quash the proceedings, asserting lack of substantial evidence and arguing that his involvement was based solely on the statements of co-accused individuals.

The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) observed, "Prima facie case of the prosecution against the petitioner Ashadullah Biswas is that he stores contraband in his godown and a huge quantity of poppy straw was loaded for transportation from his godown." The court highlighted the principle that confessions of co-accused should be considered along with other evidence and not solely relied upon. The judgment cited relevant legal precedents, including the decision in Sanjay Dutt vs The State of Maharashtra, which underscores the importance of corroborating evidence in such cases.

The court further acknowledged the directions for further investigation and the appointment of a new investigating officer to ensure a thorough probe. This move was aimed at addressing the contradictory statements made by the co-accused and assessing the involvement of the petitioner in the case.

Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) upheld the prima facie case against the petitioner, Ashadullah Biswas, based on the available evidence and the statements of co-accused individuals. The court dismissed the revision and directed the trial to proceed against the petitioner.

This judgment reaffirms the court's commitment to upholding due process and ensuring that cases are determined on the basis of sufficient and credible evidence. The decision serves as a significant precedent in the realm of narcotics cases and the use of co-accused confessions as evidence.

Date of Decision: 29.08.2023

Ashadullah Biswas @ Asadulla Biswas  vs The Union of India & Anr.       

Latest Legal News