Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Calcutta High Court Refused to Quash Trial Under NDPS Act Against Ex-CPI(M) Leader – Prima Facie Case Made Out.

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court, presided over by Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul), delivered a verdict affirming the continuation of proceedings in a high-profile narcotics case. The judgment, issued on August 29, 2023, dismisses the petitioner's plea to quash the case and orders the trial to proceed.

The case, CRR 2066 of 2019, revolves around allegations of involvement in storing and transporting contraband under Sections 8(c), 15(c), and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The petitioner, Ashadullah Biswas, sought to quash the proceedings, asserting lack of substantial evidence and arguing that his involvement was based solely on the statements of co-accused individuals.

The Hon’ble Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) observed, "Prima facie case of the prosecution against the petitioner Ashadullah Biswas is that he stores contraband in his godown and a huge quantity of poppy straw was loaded for transportation from his godown." The court highlighted the principle that confessions of co-accused should be considered along with other evidence and not solely relied upon. The judgment cited relevant legal precedents, including the decision in Sanjay Dutt vs The State of Maharashtra, which underscores the importance of corroborating evidence in such cases.

The court further acknowledged the directions for further investigation and the appointment of a new investigating officer to ensure a thorough probe. This move was aimed at addressing the contradictory statements made by the co-accused and assessing the involvement of the petitioner in the case.

Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) upheld the prima facie case against the petitioner, Ashadullah Biswas, based on the available evidence and the statements of co-accused individuals. The court dismissed the revision and directed the trial to proceed against the petitioner.

This judgment reaffirms the court's commitment to upholding due process and ensuring that cases are determined on the basis of sufficient and credible evidence. The decision serves as a significant precedent in the realm of narcotics cases and the use of co-accused confessions as evidence.

Date of Decision: 29.08.2023

Ashadullah Biswas @ Asadulla Biswas  vs The Union of India & Anr.       

Similar News