Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty, Denies Child Custody Due to Appellant’s Apathy**

06 September 2024 5:53 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Calcutta High Court granted a divorce decree to Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh) on the grounds of cruelty in her marriage to Manojit Basu. The judgment, delivered by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, highlighted a pattern of cruel behavior by the husband, including physical and mental abuse, unreasonable demands, and alcohol addiction.

The court observed, “Unchallenged testimony of P.W. 1 demonstrates the cruel nature of her husband who did not have any respect towards his wife. Instead of being supportive, he was instrumental in throttling her aspirations. He failed to accord her with dignity she deserved.”

While cruelty in matrimonial matters is not precisely defined in the statute, the judgment emphasized that it varies depending on individual circumstances, upbringing, and social status. In this case, the court found that the husband’s conduct had proven him to be “the epitome of patriarchy and an utterly insensible person, having no respect for his wife, far to speak of love and compassion.”

Additionally, the appellant husband sought custody of the child, but his non-payment of maintenance and non-disclosure of income were taken into account. The court determined that his actions exhibited apathy towards the child, leading to the denial of his custody request.

The judgment also addressed the appellant’s refusal to actively participate in the proceedings, which the court viewed as an attempt to prolong the litigation. The appellant was directed to clear arrears of maintenance for the child within four weeks, with potential execution for arrears if he fails to comply.

The court further noted that the appellant had restrictions imposed on his bank account by court order but failed to maintain the required balance, further demonstrating a lack of responsibility as a father.

This judgment serves as a reminder that the court’s primary concern is the welfare of the parties involved, especially when children are affected, and highlights the importance of cooperation and compliance with court orders in matrimonial cases.

Date of Decision: 17 October 2023

Manojit Basu  vs Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh)           

Latest Legal News