Seniority Must Be Calculated From the Date of Initial Appointment, Not Regularization: Madras High Court Rules Section 319 Cr.P.C. | Mere Association Not Enough for Criminal Liability: Karnataka HC Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds ₹25,000 Per Kanal Compensation for Land Acquired for Nangal-Talwara Railway Line, Dismisses Railway’s Appeal No Work No Pay Principle Not Applicable: Orissa High Court Orders Reinstatement and Full Back Wages for Wrongfully Terminated Lecturer No Assault, No Obstruction, Only Words Exchanged: Bombay High Court Quashes Charges of Obstruction Against Advocates Under Section 353 IPC Matrimonial Offences Can Be Quashed Even if Non-Compoundable, When Genuine Compromise Is Reached: J&K HC Plaintiff Entitled to Partition, But Must Contribute Redemption Share to Defendant: Delhi High Court Clarifies Subrogation Rights in Mortgage Redemption Labeling Someone A 'Rowdy' Without Convictions Infringes Personal Liberty And Reputation: Kerala High Court P&H High Court Denies Pensionary Benefits for Work-Charged Employee's Widow; Declares Work-Charged Service Not Eligible for ACP or Pension Benefits Acquittal is Acquittal: Rajasthan High Court Orders Appointment of Candidate Denied Job Over Past FIR At The Bail Stage, Culpability Is Not To Be Decided; Allegations Must Be Tested During Trial: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in SCST Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to "Secular" and "Socialist" Additions in Constitution Preamble Supreme Court Rejects Res Judicata in Land Allotment Case: Fresh Cause of Action Validates Public Interest Litigation Public Resources Are Not Privileges for the Few: Supreme Court Declares Preferential Land Allotments to Elites Unconstitutional Past antecedents alone cannot justify denial of bail: Kerala High Court Grants Bail Revenue Records Alone Cannot Prove Ownership: Madras High Court Dismisses Temple's Appeal for Injunction Humanitarian Grounds Cannot Undermine Investigation: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Interim Bail in ₹200 Crore Scholarship Scam The Power Under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 CPC is Drastic and Extraordinary; Should Not Be Exercised Mechanically or Merely for the Asking: Calcutta High Court Telangana High Court Strikes Down Section 10-A: Upholds Transparency in Public Employment Absence of Homogeneous Mixing and Procedural Deficiencies Vitiate NDPS Conviction: Punjab and Haryana High Court Business Disputes Cannot Be Given Criminal Color: Patna High Court Quashes Complaint in Trademark Agreement Case Gujarat High Court Appoints Wife as Guardian of Comatose Husband, Calls for Legislative Framework Standard of Proof in Professional Misconduct Requires 'Higher Threshold' but Below 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Delhi High Court Imprisonment Cannot Bar Education: Bombay HC Allows UAPA Accused to Pursue LL.B. High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case, Asserts ‘Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof’ Long separation and irreparable breakdown of marriage must be read as cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Regulation 101 Applies to All Aided Institutions, Including Minority Ones, Says Allahabad High Court Fraud Unravels All Judicial Acts : Jharkhand High Court Orders Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Ratan Heights Case Suspicious Circumstances Cannot Validate a Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds 1997 Will Over 2000 Will

Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty, Denies Child Custody Due to Appellant’s Apathy**

06 September 2024 5:53 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Calcutta High Court granted a divorce decree to Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh) on the grounds of cruelty in her marriage to Manojit Basu. The judgment, delivered by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, highlighted a pattern of cruel behavior by the husband, including physical and mental abuse, unreasonable demands, and alcohol addiction.

The court observed, “Unchallenged testimony of P.W. 1 demonstrates the cruel nature of her husband who did not have any respect towards his wife. Instead of being supportive, he was instrumental in throttling her aspirations. He failed to accord her with dignity she deserved.”

While cruelty in matrimonial matters is not precisely defined in the statute, the judgment emphasized that it varies depending on individual circumstances, upbringing, and social status. In this case, the court found that the husband’s conduct had proven him to be “the epitome of patriarchy and an utterly insensible person, having no respect for his wife, far to speak of love and compassion.”

Additionally, the appellant husband sought custody of the child, but his non-payment of maintenance and non-disclosure of income were taken into account. The court determined that his actions exhibited apathy towards the child, leading to the denial of his custody request.

The judgment also addressed the appellant’s refusal to actively participate in the proceedings, which the court viewed as an attempt to prolong the litigation. The appellant was directed to clear arrears of maintenance for the child within four weeks, with potential execution for arrears if he fails to comply.

The court further noted that the appellant had restrictions imposed on his bank account by court order but failed to maintain the required balance, further demonstrating a lack of responsibility as a father.

This judgment serves as a reminder that the court’s primary concern is the welfare of the parties involved, especially when children are affected, and highlights the importance of cooperation and compliance with court orders in matrimonial cases.

Date of Decision: 17 October 2023

Manojit Basu  vs Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh)           

Similar News