Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty, Denies Child Custody Due to Appellant’s Apathy**

06 September 2024 5:53 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Calcutta High Court granted a divorce decree to Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh) on the grounds of cruelty in her marriage to Manojit Basu. The judgment, delivered by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, highlighted a pattern of cruel behavior by the husband, including physical and mental abuse, unreasonable demands, and alcohol addiction.

The court observed, “Unchallenged testimony of P.W. 1 demonstrates the cruel nature of her husband who did not have any respect towards his wife. Instead of being supportive, he was instrumental in throttling her aspirations. He failed to accord her with dignity she deserved.”

While cruelty in matrimonial matters is not precisely defined in the statute, the judgment emphasized that it varies depending on individual circumstances, upbringing, and social status. In this case, the court found that the husband’s conduct had proven him to be “the epitome of patriarchy and an utterly insensible person, having no respect for his wife, far to speak of love and compassion.”

Additionally, the appellant husband sought custody of the child, but his non-payment of maintenance and non-disclosure of income were taken into account. The court determined that his actions exhibited apathy towards the child, leading to the denial of his custody request.

The judgment also addressed the appellant’s refusal to actively participate in the proceedings, which the court viewed as an attempt to prolong the litigation. The appellant was directed to clear arrears of maintenance for the child within four weeks, with potential execution for arrears if he fails to comply.

The court further noted that the appellant had restrictions imposed on his bank account by court order but failed to maintain the required balance, further demonstrating a lack of responsibility as a father.

This judgment serves as a reminder that the court’s primary concern is the welfare of the parties involved, especially when children are affected, and highlights the importance of cooperation and compliance with court orders in matrimonial cases.

Date of Decision: 17 October 2023

Manojit Basu  vs Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh)           

Latest Legal News