Mere Reproduction Of Evidence Can Never Be Equated With Appreciation: Karnataka High Court Quashes Penalty Against Govt Employee Accused Cannot Repeatedly Send Cheque To FSL Till Favourable Report Is Obtained: Kerala High Court In NI Act Case Succession Certificate Cannot Be Issued For Gold Jewels Pledged With Bank, Applies Only To Debts And Securities: Madras High Court Order 11 Rule 14 CPC | Court Cannot Direct Production Of Documents Without Ascertaining They Are In Party's Possession: Calcutta High Court Undertrial Prisoners Don't Suffer 'Civil Death', Retain Fundamental Right To Alienate Property From Jail: Rajasthan High Court Direction For Reasonable Annual Enhancement Of Maintenance Under Section 125 CrPC Merely Preserves Its Real Value Against Inflation: Delhi High Court Testimony Of Sole Interested Witness Must Be Of 'Sterling Quality' To Base Conviction: Patna High Court Acquits Murder Convict Failure To Communicate Written Grounds Of Arrest Renders Arrest Constitutionally Infirm, Accused Entitled To Bail: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 482 CrPC Petition Not Maintainable Against Order Framing Charge Under SC/ST Act, Appeal Lies Under Section 14A: Tripura High Court Disputed Questions Of Fact Regarding Title And Forged Documents Cannot Be Decided Under Article 226: Telangana High Court Matter To Be Enquired By Bar Council: Madhya Pradesh High Court Dismisses Lawyer's PILs With Costs For Suppressing Attorney-Client Relationship BDA Cannot Arbitrarily Reverse Resolutions Passed To Comply With Judicial Directives: Karnataka High Court Section 52A NDPS Act: Mere Non-Compliance Does Not Automatically Vitiate Trial Unless Evidence Is Doubtful: Punjab & Haryana High Court Seniority Must Be Determined From Date Of Substantive Appointment, Not Ad-Hoc Service: Allahabad High Court Uncorroborated Testimony Of Drug Inspector Cannot Form Sole Basis For Conviction Under Drugs Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Suppression Of Adverse Facts Strikes At Root Of Equitable Jurisdiction: Bombay High Court Denies Injunction In HUF Property Dispute

Calcutta High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty, Denies Child Custody Due to Appellant’s Apathy**

06 September 2024 5:53 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Calcutta High Court granted a divorce decree to Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh) on the grounds of cruelty in her marriage to Manojit Basu. The judgment, delivered by Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, highlighted a pattern of cruel behavior by the husband, including physical and mental abuse, unreasonable demands, and alcohol addiction.

The court observed, “Unchallenged testimony of P.W. 1 demonstrates the cruel nature of her husband who did not have any respect towards his wife. Instead of being supportive, he was instrumental in throttling her aspirations. He failed to accord her with dignity she deserved.”

While cruelty in matrimonial matters is not precisely defined in the statute, the judgment emphasized that it varies depending on individual circumstances, upbringing, and social status. In this case, the court found that the husband’s conduct had proven him to be “the epitome of patriarchy and an utterly insensible person, having no respect for his wife, far to speak of love and compassion.”

Additionally, the appellant husband sought custody of the child, but his non-payment of maintenance and non-disclosure of income were taken into account. The court determined that his actions exhibited apathy towards the child, leading to the denial of his custody request.

The judgment also addressed the appellant’s refusal to actively participate in the proceedings, which the court viewed as an attempt to prolong the litigation. The appellant was directed to clear arrears of maintenance for the child within four weeks, with potential execution for arrears if he fails to comply.

The court further noted that the appellant had restrictions imposed on his bank account by court order but failed to maintain the required balance, further demonstrating a lack of responsibility as a father.

This judgment serves as a reminder that the court’s primary concern is the welfare of the parties involved, especially when children are affected, and highlights the importance of cooperation and compliance with court orders in matrimonial cases.

Date of Decision: 17 October 2023

Manojit Basu  vs Shyamasree Basu (nee Ghosh)           

Latest Legal News