Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Calcutta High Court Confirms Interim Order Restraining Simplex Infrastructures Ltd. From Dealing with Assets Pending Arbitration

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court, presided over by the Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya, confirmed the interim order granting relief to Bridge Track and Tower Private Limited in a dispute against Simplex Infrastructures Limited. The judgment, delivered on 19th July 2023, dealt with an application under Section 9 and Section 11 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the petitioner sought interim relief and appointment of an arbitrator.

The court’s decision upholds the petitioner’s claim against the respondent, Simplex Infrastructures Limited, and restrains them from dealing with or disposing of their assets and properties or creating any third-party rights on the subject matter of the disputes/arbitration agreements.

The crux of the ruling revolved around the respondent’s belated objection concerning separate arbitration clauses in six purchase orders. Justice Bhattacharya dismissed the respondent’s objection, remarking that the objection appeared to be an afterthought and cited the respondent’s act of treating the six purchase orders as one for payment purposes.

“In any event, the affidavit-in-reply of the petitioner clearly states that the respondent has paid Rs. 32 lacs as on 27th February 2019 by way of a single cheque... Having treated the 6 purchase orders as one and having clubbed all of them for making a onetime payment of Rs. 32 lacs, the respondent cannot now take the point of maintainability on the ground of each being a separate purchase order,” Justice Bhattacharya wrote in the judgment.

The court also rejected the respondent’s claim of a change in circumstances since the interim order and emphasized that no subsequent events justified modifying the said order.

The ruling marks a crucial development in the ongoing dispute, and the court’s confirmation of the interim order brings relief to Bridge Track and Tower Private Limited. The judgment reinforces the importance of adhering to arbitration clauses and maintains the sanctity of such clauses in commercial agreements.

Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Bridge Track and Tower Private Limited  Vs. Simplex Infrastructures Limited

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bridge_Track_And_Tower_Private_vs_Simplex_Infrastructures_Limited_on_19_July_2023_Cal.HC_.pdf"]

Latest Legal News