Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Burden of Proof Not Discharged by Complainant; Accused's Defense Prevails - High Court Upholds Acquittal in ShriRam Finance Cheque Dishonor Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a notable judgment delivered on 4th April 2024, the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, under the bench headed by Justice M.K. Thakker, reaffirmed the principles of rebuttable presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act in the case of Shriram Transport Finance Co. Limited Thro Vikas Laxmanbhai Patil v. State of Gujarat & Anr. The judgment underscored the onus of the accused to dislodge the presumption in favor of the complainant, a task successfully undertaken by the defense in this case, leading to the upholding of the trial court's decision to acquit.

Legal Context and Facts: The appeal in R/Criminal Appeal (Against Acquittal) No. 250 of 2023 contested the acquittal in a cheque dishonor situation, where a cheque intended for part payment of a loan was returned due to insufficient funds. This case was anchored in the interpretation of Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code alongside Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

 

Rebuttable Presumption and Defense Strategy: The High Court highlighted that the accused effectively rebutted the presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act, establishing a plausible defense that the loan amount was fully repaid and the cheque was misused.

Complainant's Evidentiary Shortcomings: The court observed critical gaps in the complainant's evidence, notably in detailing the loan transaction and providing crucial documents, thus failing to establish a legally enforceable debt.

Scope of Appellate Review in Acquittal: Emphasizing the appellate court's comprehensive power to reassess evidence, the judgment reinforced the legal principle that acquittal appeals require a careful approach due to the double presumption of innocence in favor of the accused.

Justice Thakker, in his judgment, upheld the acquittal, underscoring the defense's success in shifting the evidentiary burden back to the complainant, who then failed to establish their claim. The decision reiterates the importance of a well-founded defense in negating presumptions under the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Date of Decision: 4th April 2024

Shriram Transport Finance Co. Limited  v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

 

Similar News