"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |    

Bona Fide Requirement Established: High Court Upholds Ejectment of Tenant for Non-Payment and Landlord’s Personal Necessity

05 September 2024 6:16 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh, presided over by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Amarjot Bhatti, has upheld the decisions of the lower courts in a landlord-tenant dispute, leading to the ejectment of the tenant for non-payment of rent and the landlord’s established personal necessity. The landmark judgment was pronounced on December 20, 2023.

The case, titled Balkar Singh vs. Sucha Singh, revolved around the petitioner’s challenge to the judgment of the Appellate Authority and the order of the Rent Controller. The petitioner, Balkar Singh, claimed that these orders were based on conjectures and surmises and failed to appreciate the material evidence on record.

Justice Bhatti, in her judgment, meticulously addressed the various aspects of the case. A key focus was on the landlord’s bona fide requirement for the property. “The landlord has every right to start his own business in his own premises as per his desire. It is his moral duty to settle down his grown-up sons during his lifetime,” Justice Bhatti observed, underscoring the legitimacy of the landlord’s claim to the property for personal and familial business ventures.

The tenant’s liability for the arrears of rent since January 2000 was another critical factor in the decision. Despite the tenant’s claim of a different landlord and a dispute over the rent amount, the court found substantial evidence supporting the landlord’s claim of unpaid rent.

The judgment also delved into the validity of the landlord’s title to the property, dismissing the tenant’s denial of the landlord-tenant relationship. “The findings given by the Courts below regarding the relationship of landlord and tenant between the parties is duly established,” the judge noted, affirming the lower courts’ conclusions.

Date of Decision: 20.12.2023

Balkar Singh VS Sucha Singh                     

 

Similar News