Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |    

"Bombay High Court Upholds Rights of Visually Impaired Candidate, Directs Railway Recruitment Cell to Process Candidature"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment affirming the rights of persons with disabilities, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justices Nitin Jamdar and M.M. Sathaye, has set a precedent by directing the Railway Recruitment Cell to process the candidature of Mrs. Shanta Digambar Sonawane, a 100% visually impaired candidate. The court's decision came after the petitioner's application for the post of Assistant in Level-1 in 'D' grade was initially rejected due to an error in her date of birth entry.

The court observed, "The stand taken by the Respondents that they are bound by the clause of advertisement to apply it uniformly and inflexibly and they therefore cannot remedy the situation, in spite of Court calling upon them to do so, overlooks the responsibility to treat persons with disabilities differently." This statement underscores the need for authorities to exercise sensitivity and flexibility when dealing with candidates with disabilities.

Justice Jamdar, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, stating, "The legislation for the disabled should not merely remain in the statute book; rather, the spirit behind the legislation must be applied by all authorities in its practical application showing appropriate sensitivity and flexibility."

The case, which highlights the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in the employment sector, saw the petitioner initially being denied the opportunity to correct a minor error in her application form. The court criticized this approach, noting, "Rejecting the applications and then refusing to remedy the mistakes even within a reasonable time solely because of these errors, would contravene the principle of equality."

In its decision, the court directed the Railway Recruitment Cell to process Sonawane's candidature within six weeks, setting aside the rejection of her application. This judgment is seen as a significant step towards ensuring equal opportunities and fair treatment for persons with disabilities in India.

The case has been closely followed by advocates and activists working in the field of disability rights, who hail the decision as a victory for inclusivity and fairness in the public employment sector.

Date of Decision : 27-02-2024

Mrs. Shanta Digambar Sonawane  Vs.Union of India and Others

Similar News