Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

"Bombay High Court Upholds Rights of Visually Impaired Candidate, Directs Railway Recruitment Cell to Process Candidature"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment affirming the rights of persons with disabilities, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justices Nitin Jamdar and M.M. Sathaye, has set a precedent by directing the Railway Recruitment Cell to process the candidature of Mrs. Shanta Digambar Sonawane, a 100% visually impaired candidate. The court's decision came after the petitioner's application for the post of Assistant in Level-1 in 'D' grade was initially rejected due to an error in her date of birth entry.

The court observed, "The stand taken by the Respondents that they are bound by the clause of advertisement to apply it uniformly and inflexibly and they therefore cannot remedy the situation, in spite of Court calling upon them to do so, overlooks the responsibility to treat persons with disabilities differently." This statement underscores the need for authorities to exercise sensitivity and flexibility when dealing with candidates with disabilities.

Justice Jamdar, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, stating, "The legislation for the disabled should not merely remain in the statute book; rather, the spirit behind the legislation must be applied by all authorities in its practical application showing appropriate sensitivity and flexibility."

The case, which highlights the challenges faced by individuals with disabilities in the employment sector, saw the petitioner initially being denied the opportunity to correct a minor error in her application form. The court criticized this approach, noting, "Rejecting the applications and then refusing to remedy the mistakes even within a reasonable time solely because of these errors, would contravene the principle of equality."

In its decision, the court directed the Railway Recruitment Cell to process Sonawane's candidature within six weeks, setting aside the rejection of her application. This judgment is seen as a significant step towards ensuring equal opportunities and fair treatment for persons with disabilities in India.

The case has been closely followed by advocates and activists working in the field of disability rights, who hail the decision as a victory for inclusivity and fairness in the public employment sector.

Date of Decision : 27-02-2024

Mrs. Shanta Digambar Sonawane  Vs.Union of India and Others

Latest Legal News