Delhi High Court Frames Criminal Contempt Charges Against Advocate For Scandalizing Judge On LinkedIn After Cyber Cell Traces IP Logs Testimony Of Partially Hostile Witnesses Can Be Relied Upon If Corroborated: Delhi High Court Upholds Police Officer's Conviction Subordinate Engineers Entitled To Non-Functional Upgradation Even If Level 8 Reached Via MACP: Supreme Court FEMA Adjudicating Authority Cannot Overrule Competent Authority's Refusal To Confirm Asset Seizure: Supreme Court Candidate Cannot Claim Lower Preference Post After Securing First Choice Under Merit-Cum-Preference System: Madhya Pradesh High Court Official Cannot Escape Corruption Trial Merely Because 90% Payment Was Made Prior To His Joining: Calcutta High Court Employee Who Evades Cross-Examining Witnesses Cannot Later Claim 'No Evidence' In Departmental Enquiry: Andhra Pradesh High Court Fictitious Or Non-Genuine Revenue Entries Cannot Confer Adhivasi Rights Under UP Zamindari Abolition Act: Allahabad High Court Calcutta High Court Quashes Termination Of Compassionate Appointee Over Age Dispute, Says Such Claims Cannot Be Kept Pending Indefinitely Alleged Custodial Torture Does Not Automatically Attract Contempt Under 'D.K. Basu' Unless Specific Arrest Guidelines Are Violated: Gujarat High Court Authority Cannot Act As 'Judge In Own Cause'; Himachal Pradesh High Court Quashes Distillery License Cancellation Over Procedural Impropriety Financial Corporations Have Absolute Power To Fix Employee Pay, Prior State Govt Approval Not Required: Jharkhand High Court Custodial Interrogation Not Required For Police Inspector Accused Only Of Illegal Confinement Prior To Victim's Death: Karnataka High Court Rescission Of Contract Without Hearing Is Illegal; Courts Cannot Interfere In Second Appeal If Findings Rest On Unrebutted Evidence: Gauhati High Court RTI Penalty Proceedings Are Between Commission and SPIO Alone — Complainant Has No Right To Be Heard: Kerala High Court Catastrophic To Allow Law To Take Its Own Course: MP High Court Quashes POCSO, BNS FIR After Victim And Accused Marry No Presumption Under Section 20 PC Act Without Proof Of Demand And Acceptance: Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against Sub-Inspector Attack On Judicial Officers Is Criminal Contempt; Supreme Court Orders CBI/NIA Probe Into West Bengal Incident Prolonged Physical Relationship By Educated Woman Amounts To 'Promiscuity', Not Rape Induced By Misconception Of Fact: Punjab & Haryana High Court Father Cannot Escape Duty To Maintain Minor Children Merely Because Mother Earns Substantial Income: Uttarakhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled To Maintenance; Mere Earning Capacity Not A Bar: Orissa High Court Limitation Period Starts From Date Of Knowledge Of Document, Not From When Certified Copy Is Obtained: Madras High Court Mere Mass Transfer Of Officers By Election Commission Does Not Paralyse State Machinery: Calcutta High Court Dismisses PIL Right To Appeal Under Senior Citizens Act Belongs Exclusively To Parents, Children Cannot File Appeal: Orissa High Court Acquittal Cannot Survive When Overt Acts Are Clearly Proved: Madras High Court Convicts Two Accused in Village Clash Killing

Bombay High Court Upholds Right to Fair Trial: Directs Production of Withheld Documents in Sexual Assault Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has underscored the importance of fair investigation and trial in criminal proceedings. Justice Bharati Dangre, presiding over the case, emphasized the accused’s entitlement to all relevant evidence, including documents withheld by the Investigating Officer. The court’s directive came in the case 2023:BHC-AS:37405 involving Dr. Sublendu Prakash Diwakar, accused in a sexual assault case.

Justice Dangre noted, “It is now imperative for the prosecution, as a matter of rule, in all criminal trials to comply with Rule 4 of the Draft Guidelines approved by the Apex court to be adopted by all States and furnish the list of statements, documents, material objects and exhibits, which are not relied upon by the Investigating Officer.”

The petitioner, Dr. Diwakar, sought the quashing of an order by the Additional Sessions Judge, which had rejected his application for the production of documents crucial to his defense. These documents were originally submitted to the Investigating Officer but not included in the charge-sheet.

Highlighting the right to a fair trial, the judgment stated, “The right of the accused to be entitled to the aforesaid documents has been recognized as a part of his right to have a fair trial and fair investigation, and the Court trying the accused must ensure fairness of the investigating process.”

The High Court’s decision is a landmark in ensuring justice and fair play in the judicial system, particularly in criminal cases where the balance of evidence is crucial. By directing the Sessions Court to ensure the production of the withheld documents, the court has reinforced the principle that every accused person is entitled to a full and fair opportunity to present their defense.

Date of Decision-04.Dec.2023

Dr.Sublendu Prakash Diwakar VS State of Maharashtra

 

Latest Legal News