Appellate Court Can Allow Additional Evidence To Ensure Fair Adjudication Even If Not Produced In Trial: Madhya Pradesh High Court Police Can Freeze Bank Accounts Under Section 106 BNSS Upon Suspicion Of 'Proceeds Of Crime': Punjab & Haryana High Court 'No Penalty For Monthly MGQ Shortfall If Annual Target Met': Supreme Court Upholds Quashing Of Excise Department Demands For Liquor Licensees 'Murder Went Unavenged, But Courts Cannot Convict On Mere Assumptions': Supreme Court Acquits Accused In 1988 Murder Case, Quashes High Court's Remit Order 'NCSC Cannot Pass Mandatory Adjudicatory Orders Directing Payment Of Arrears': Supreme Court Clarifies Commission's Powers Under Article 338 "'Cannot Present Fait Accompli': Supreme Court Upholds Denial Of NOC To Airman For Skipping Prior Permission To Apply For Civil Post" Supreme Court Upholds 2017 Notification For Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearances, Quashes 2021 Office Memorandum As Impermissible Executive Overreach Workman Fails To Prove 240 Days Continuous Work; Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Denial Of Reinstatement For "Abandonment Of Service" Party Cannot Take Contradictory Stands In Same Case, Admissions In Pleadings Bind Them Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC: Telangana High Court Delayed Recovery Of Weapon From Open Space Casts Serious Doubt On Prosecution Story: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Convicts Procedural Irregularities By Public Servants Serve As Circumstantial Evidence Of Conspiracy In Corruption Cases: Kerala High Court Blaming Previous Counsel For Omission Does Not Satisfy 'Due Diligence' Test To Amend Plaint After Trial Commences: Punjab & Haryana High Court Muslim Man's Second Marriage Under Special Marriage Act Void Despite Personal Law Permitting Bigamy: Karnataka High Court Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Criminal Antecedents Disentitles Accused To Discretionary Relief Of Bail: Orissa High Court Section 311 CrPC | Delay Or Absence Of Examination-In-Chief No Bar To Summon Material Witnesses: Allahabad High Court Revenue Authorities Lack Jurisdiction To Declare Genuineness Of Wills Or Validity Of Settlement Deeds; Parties Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Demand Of Bribe Is Sine Qua Non For Conviction Under PC Act, Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Not Enough: Bombay High Court Title And Ownership Irrelevant In Suit Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act; Plaint Liable To Be Rejected If Filed Beyond Six Months: Delhi High Court Receipt Of Pension By Widow Can Be Considered To Determine 'Just Compensation' But Not To Deprive Claimants Of Award: Calcutta High Court FSL Report Lacking Scientific Criteria And Data Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Allahabad High Court Issues Directives For Testing Viscera Standard Of Proof In Railway Accident Claims Is Preponderance Of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Gujarat High Court No Second Statutory Appeal Lies Against Conviction By Appellate Court Reversing Acquittal; Revision Is Sole Remedy: Supreme Court Wives' Property Is Their Own, Not Husband's: Supreme Court REJECTS High Court's Succession Formula; Restores Clarity For Christian Inheritance

Bombay High Court Upholds Maintenance Rights for Second Wife: “Respondent Cannot Deny Maintenance, Taking Advantage of His Own Wrong”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Bombay High Court has reinforced the rights of women seeking maintenance in disputed marital scenarios. The court, presided over by Justice Rajesh S. Patil, delivered a significant verdict in the case of Mrs. Alka Bhausaheb Bhad vs. Mr. Bhausaheb Ramrao Bhad and Another, emphasizing the legal interpretation of ‘wife’ under Section 125 of the Cr.PC.

The petitioner, Mrs. Alka Bhausaheb Bhad, had approached the court challenging the decision of the Sessions Court, Niphad, which had set aside an earlier order by the J.M.F.C., Yeola, granting her maintenance. Mrs. Bhad claimed to be the second wife of the respondent, Mr. Bhausaheb Ramrao Bhad, and sought maintenance citing her marriage and the birth of their children.

In his ruling, Justice Patil stated, “Respondent cannot be allowed to deny the maintenance claim to the petitioner, taking advantage of his own wrong.” This observation came after a thorough analysis of the evidence presented, including school documents of the children and testimonies confirming the marriage.

The court referred to various Supreme Court judgments, including the notable cases of Badshah vs. Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse & Anr, Chanmuniya vs. Virender Kumar Singh Kushwaha, and Dwarika Prasad Satpathy vs. Bidyut Prava Dixit. These precedents played a crucial role in the decision, especially in interpreting the term ‘wife’ in the context of Section 125 of the Cr.PC.

Justice Patil’s judgment underlined the purpose of Section 125 Cr.PC, which is to prevent vagrancy and destitution by providing a speedy remedy for maintenance to wives, children, and parents. The court reinstated the maintenance order by the J.M.F.C., Yeola, directing the respondent to clear the outstanding maintenance amount within two months. Additionally, the petitioner was granted the liberty to file a fresh application for the enhancement of the maintenance amount.

This judgment marks a significant step in acknowledging the complexities surrounding marital relationships and the legal rights of women in maintenance claims, reinforcing the judiciary's role in upholding social justice.

Decided on : 14-12-2023

MRS. ALKA BHAUSAHEB BHAD @ ALKA DAGADU SHELKE Vs. MR. BHAUSAHEB RAMRAO BHAD AND OTHER

 

Latest Legal News