Vague Allegations Of Infidelity And Harassment Without Cogent Evidence Do Not Amount To Cruelty For Divorce: Telangana High Court Supreme Court Introduces 'Periodic Review' Mechanism For Monitoring Contumacious Advocates Supreme Court Suspends Criminal Contempt Conviction Of Yatin Oza; Invokes Article 142 To Grant 'Final Act Of Forgiveness' With Periodic Conduct Review Court Must Adopt Parental Temperament While Disciplining Bar Members; SC Suspends Yatin Oza’s Contempt Conviction As ‘Final Act Of Forgiveness’ Conviction Can Be Based On Testimony Of Solitary Witness Of Sterling Quality; Indian Law Values Quality Over Quantity Of Evidence: Supreme Court Authorities Can't Turn A Blind Eye To Illegal Constructions; Must Follow Due Process For Demolition: Telangana High Court Section 506 IPC Charges Liable To Be Quashed If Threat Lacks 'Intent To Cause Alarm' To Complainant: Supreme Court SC/ST Act Offences Not Made Out If Alleged Abuse Occurs Inside Private Residence Without Public Presence: Supreme Court Election Tribunal Becomes Functus Officio After Passing Final Order; Cannot Later Declare New Result Based On Recount: Supreme Court Remarriage Contracted Immediately After Divorce Decree Before Expiry Of Limitation Period Has No Validity In Law: Telangana High Court Lack Of Notice For Spot Inspection Under Stamp Act Is An Irregularity, Not Illegality If No Prejudice Caused: Allahabad High Court Mutation Entry In Revenue Records Does Not Create Or Extinguish Title; Succession To Agricultural Land Governed Strictly By Statute: Delhi High Court Children Shouldn't Be Deprived Of Parental Affection Due To Matrimonial Disputes; Courts Must Ensure Child Isn't Tutored: Andhra Pradesh High Court 138 NI Act | Wife Of Sole Proprietor Not Vicariously Liable For Dishonoured Cheque She Didn't Sign: Calcutta High Court Quashes Proceedings State Cannot Profit From Its Own Delay In Deciding Land Tenure Conversion Applications: Gujarat High Court Owner Of Establishment Cannot Evade Liability Under Employees’ Compensation Act By Shifting Responsibility To Manager: Bombay High Court Developer Assigning Only Leasehold Rights Via Sub-Lease Not A 'Promoter', Project Doesn't Require RERA Registration: Allahabad High Court Court Cannot Be Oblivious To Juveniles Used By Organized Syndicates To Commit Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Denies Bail To CCL Conviction For Assaulting Public Servant Sustainable Based On Victim's Testimony & Medical Evidence Even If Eye-Witnesses Turn Hostile: Bombay High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Anonymous Donations to Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust Not Taxable Under Section 115BBC

13 October 2024 11:47 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


Charitable Trusts with Religious Purposes Entitled to Tax Exemption on Anonymous Donations , the Bombay High Court, in Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi), ruled that anonymous donations received by a charitable trust, which also engages in religious activities, are exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the earlier decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue’s argument that the trust’s status as a charitable institution under Section 80G precluded the exemption.

The Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust, which operates the famous Sai Baba Temple in Shirdi, had received substantial anonymous donations through its Hundi collections during the assessment years 2015-16, 2017-18, and 2018-19. The Assessing Officer taxed these donations under Section 115BBC(1), asserting that the trust, being registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes, could not claim an exemption for religious donations.

The trust appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), arguing that it was a mixed-purpose trust engaged in both charitable and religious activities, qualifying for the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The CIT(A) and the ITAT ruled in favor of the trust, prompting the Revenue to challenge these decisions before the High Court.

Anonymous Donations and Section 115BBC: The Revenue argued that since the trust was registered under Section 80G, it was exclusively a charitable institution and, therefore, liable to tax on anonymous donations. However, the court observed that Section 115BBC(2)(b) provides an exemption for trusts engaged in both charitable and religious purposes, as long as their religious activities do not exceed 5% of their total income.

Religious and Charitable Nature of the Trust: The court examined the trust’s objects, which included maintaining religious places of worship, performing rituals, and charitable activities like feeding the poor. It concluded that the trust was established for both religious and charitable purposes, entitling it to the exemption.

Section 80G and Religious Purposes: The court rejected the Revenue’s contention that Section 80G registration, which pertains to charitable institutions, automatically disqualified the trust from claiming the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court clarified that a trust could be both charitable and religious, and the two provisions could coexist.

The Bombay High Court ruled that the anonymous donations received by the Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust were exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court affirmed that the trust’s mixed-purpose activities qualified it for the exemption and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals.

This judgment reinforces the principle that religious charitable trusts can claim tax exemptions on anonymous donations under Section 115BBC, even if they are registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes. The ruling protects the rights of mixed-purpose trusts to continue their charitable and religious activities without facing undue tax burdens.

 

Date of Decision: October 8, 2024

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi)

Latest Legal News