Victim Has Locus To Request Court To Summon Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC In State Prosecution: Allahabad High Court Order 2 Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Ground to Reject a Plaint: Supreme Court Draws Crucial Distinction Between Bar to Sue and Bar by Law No Right to Lawyer Before Advisory Board in Preventive Detention — Unless Government Appears Through Legal Practitioner: Supreme Court Wife's Dowry Statement Cannot Be Used to Prosecute Her for 'Giving' Dowry: Supreme Court Upholds Section 7(3) Shield Husband's Loan Repayments Cannot Reduce Wife's Maintenance: Supreme Court Raises Amount to ₹25,000 From ₹15,000 Prisoners Don't Surrender Their Rights at the Prison Gate: Supreme Court Issues Binding SOP to End Delays in Legal Aid Appeals A Judgment Must Be a Self-Contained Document Even When Defendant Never Appears: Supreme Court on Ex Parte Decrees Court Cannot Dismiss Ex Parte Suit on Unpleaded, Unframed Issue: Supreme Court Sets Aside Specific Performance Decree Denied on Title Erroneous High Court Observations Cannot Be Used to Stake Property Claims: Supreme Court Steps In to Prevent Misuse of Judicial Observations No Criminal Proceedings Would Have Been Initiated Had Financial Settlement Succeeded: Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail In Rape Case Directors Cannot Escape Pollution Law Prosecution by Claiming Ignorance: Allahabad High Court Refuses to Quash Summons Against Company Directors Order 7 Rule 11 CPC | Court Cannot Peek Into Defence While Rejecting Plaint: Delhi High Court Death 3½ Months After Accident Doesn't Break Causal Link If Doctors Testify Injuries Could Cause Death: Andhra Pradesh High Court LLB Intern Posed as Supreme Court Advocate, Used Fake Bar Council Card and Police Station Seals to Defraud Victims of Rs. 80 Lakhs: Gujarat High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail Husband Who Travels to Wife's City on Leave, Cohabits With Her, Then Claims She 'Never Lived With Him' Cannot Prove Cruelty: Jharkhand High Court Liquor Licence Is a State Privilege, Not a Citizen's Right — No Vested Right of Renewal Survives a Change in Rules: Karnataka High Court Sets Aside Stay on E-Auction Policy Court Holiday Cannot Save Prosecution From Default Bail: MP High Court No Search At Your Premises, No Incriminating Document, No Case: Rajasthan HC Quashes Rs. 18 Crore Tax Assessment Under Section 153C Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Anonymous Donations to Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust Not Taxable Under Section 115BBC

13 October 2024 11:47 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


Charitable Trusts with Religious Purposes Entitled to Tax Exemption on Anonymous Donations , the Bombay High Court, in Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi), ruled that anonymous donations received by a charitable trust, which also engages in religious activities, are exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the earlier decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue’s argument that the trust’s status as a charitable institution under Section 80G precluded the exemption.

The Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust, which operates the famous Sai Baba Temple in Shirdi, had received substantial anonymous donations through its Hundi collections during the assessment years 2015-16, 2017-18, and 2018-19. The Assessing Officer taxed these donations under Section 115BBC(1), asserting that the trust, being registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes, could not claim an exemption for religious donations.

The trust appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), arguing that it was a mixed-purpose trust engaged in both charitable and religious activities, qualifying for the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The CIT(A) and the ITAT ruled in favor of the trust, prompting the Revenue to challenge these decisions before the High Court.

Anonymous Donations and Section 115BBC: The Revenue argued that since the trust was registered under Section 80G, it was exclusively a charitable institution and, therefore, liable to tax on anonymous donations. However, the court observed that Section 115BBC(2)(b) provides an exemption for trusts engaged in both charitable and religious purposes, as long as their religious activities do not exceed 5% of their total income.

Religious and Charitable Nature of the Trust: The court examined the trust’s objects, which included maintaining religious places of worship, performing rituals, and charitable activities like feeding the poor. It concluded that the trust was established for both religious and charitable purposes, entitling it to the exemption.

Section 80G and Religious Purposes: The court rejected the Revenue’s contention that Section 80G registration, which pertains to charitable institutions, automatically disqualified the trust from claiming the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court clarified that a trust could be both charitable and religious, and the two provisions could coexist.

The Bombay High Court ruled that the anonymous donations received by the Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust were exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court affirmed that the trust’s mixed-purpose activities qualified it for the exemption and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals.

This judgment reinforces the principle that religious charitable trusts can claim tax exemptions on anonymous donations under Section 115BBC, even if they are registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes. The ruling protects the rights of mixed-purpose trusts to continue their charitable and religious activities without facing undue tax burdens.

 

Date of Decision: October 8, 2024

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi)

Latest Legal News