Marumakkathayam Law | Partition Is An Act By Which The Nature Of The Property Is Changed, Reflecting An Alteration In Ownership: Supreme Court Motor Accident Claim | Compensation Must Aim To Restore, As Far As Possible, What Has Been Irretrievably Lost: Supreme Court Awards Rs. 1.02 Crore Personal Criticism Of Judges Or Recording Findings On Their Conduct In Judgments Must Be Avoided: Supreme Court Efficiency In Arbitral Proceedings Is Integral To Effective Dispute Resolution. Courts Must Ensure That Arbitral Processes Reach Their Logical End: Supreme Court Onus Lies On The Propounder To Remove All Suspicious Circumstances Surrounding A Will To The Satisfaction Of The Court: Calcutta High Court Deeds of Gift Not Governed by Section 22-B of Registration Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Testimony Of  Injured Witness Carries A Built-In Guarantee Of Truthfulness: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempted Murder POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained Without Conclusive Proof Of Minority - Burden Lies On The Prosecution: Telangana High Court Credible Eyewitness Account, Supported By Forensic Corroboration, Creates An Unassailable Chain Of Proof That Withstands Scrutiny: Punjab and Haryana High Court Jammu & Kashmir High Court Grants Bail to Schizophrenic Mother Accused of Murdering Infant Son IT Act | Ambiguity in statutory notices undermines the principles of natural justice: Delhi High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeals Gauhati High Court Upholds Conviction Under NDPS Act: Procedural Lapses Insufficient to Overturn Case Himachal Pradesh High Court Acquits Murder Accused, Points to Possible Suicide Pact in "Tragic Love Affair" Tampering With Historical Documents To Support A Caste Claim Strikes At The Root Of Public Trust And Cannot Be Tolerated: Bombay High Court Offense Impacts Society as a Whole: Madras High Court Denies Bail in Cyber Harassment Case Custody disputes must be resolved in appropriate forums, and courts cannot intervene beyond legal frameworks in the guise of habeas corpus jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Insubordination Is A Contagious Malady In Any Employment And More So In Public Service : Karnataka High Court imposes Rs. 10,000 fine on Tribunal staff for frivolous petition A Show Cause Notice Issued Without Jurisdiction Cannot Withstand Judicial Scrutiny: AP High Court Sets Aside Rs. 75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand Timely Action is Key: P&H HC Upholds Lawful Retirement at 58 for Class-III Employees Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Applicable to Civil Court Orders: Patna High Court Uttarakhand High Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown, Acknowledges Cruelty Due to Prolonged Separation Prosecution Must Prove Common Object For An Unlawful Assembly - Conviction Cannot Rest On Assumptions: Telangana High Court

Bombay High Court Rules Anonymous Donations to Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust Not Taxable Under Section 115BBC

13 October 2024 11:47 AM

By: Deepak Kumar


Charitable Trusts with Religious Purposes Entitled to Tax Exemption on Anonymous Donations , the Bombay High Court, in Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi), ruled that anonymous donations received by a charitable trust, which also engages in religious activities, are exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the earlier decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), dismissing the Revenue’s argument that the trust’s status as a charitable institution under Section 80G precluded the exemption.

The Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust, which operates the famous Sai Baba Temple in Shirdi, had received substantial anonymous donations through its Hundi collections during the assessment years 2015-16, 2017-18, and 2018-19. The Assessing Officer taxed these donations under Section 115BBC(1), asserting that the trust, being registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes, could not claim an exemption for religious donations.

The trust appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), arguing that it was a mixed-purpose trust engaged in both charitable and religious activities, qualifying for the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The CIT(A) and the ITAT ruled in favor of the trust, prompting the Revenue to challenge these decisions before the High Court.

Anonymous Donations and Section 115BBC: The Revenue argued that since the trust was registered under Section 80G, it was exclusively a charitable institution and, therefore, liable to tax on anonymous donations. However, the court observed that Section 115BBC(2)(b) provides an exemption for trusts engaged in both charitable and religious purposes, as long as their religious activities do not exceed 5% of their total income.

Religious and Charitable Nature of the Trust: The court examined the trust’s objects, which included maintaining religious places of worship, performing rituals, and charitable activities like feeding the poor. It concluded that the trust was established for both religious and charitable purposes, entitling it to the exemption.

Section 80G and Religious Purposes: The court rejected the Revenue’s contention that Section 80G registration, which pertains to charitable institutions, automatically disqualified the trust from claiming the exemption under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court clarified that a trust could be both charitable and religious, and the two provisions could coexist.

The Bombay High Court ruled that the anonymous donations received by the Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust were exempt from taxation under Section 115BBC(2)(b). The court affirmed that the trust’s mixed-purpose activities qualified it for the exemption and dismissed the Revenue’s appeals.

This judgment reinforces the principle that religious charitable trusts can claim tax exemptions on anonymous donations under Section 115BBC, even if they are registered under Section 80G for charitable purposes. The ruling protects the rights of mixed-purpose trusts to continue their charitable and religious activities without facing undue tax burdens.

 

Date of Decision: October 8, 2024

Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) Mumbai v. Shree Sai Baba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi)

Similar News