Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

BOMBAY HIGH COURT HIGHLIGHTS NEED FOR RETHINKING AGE OF CONSENT IN INDIA, PROTECTING ADOLESCENT RIGHTS

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 10 July 2023, In a landmark judgment delivered by the honourable court, a significant emphasis has been placed on the need to reconsider the age of consent in India and ensure the protection of adolescent rights. The judgment, which has garnered attention for its progressive stance, underscores the complexities surrounding consensual sexual relationships involving minors and the implications of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses (POCSO) Act.

The court, in its ruling, expressed concerns about the current legal framework, which deems any sexual activity with a minor as statutory rape, irrespective of the minor's active participation and consent. The judgment highlights the importance of recognizing adolescent rights, including sexual autonomy and protection from unwanted sexual aggression.

Bombay High Court , "The essence of 'consent' lies in the surrounding circumstances, which would lead to an inference of 'consent'... Development of sexuality starts as early as in intrauterine life... Adolescence is a phase of transition during which major developments of sexuality take place... It is during this period, cognitive development takes place and results in the development of thinking and reasoning... Adolescence is a period during which an individual's thought perception as well as response gets colored sexually."

The judgment also acknowledges the influence of external factors such as easy access to information through the internet, movies, and other media platforms on adolescents' sexual curiosity and behavior. It emphasizes the need for responsible moderation of behavior and sexual education to guide adolescents in making informed decisions.

Referring to international standards, the court noted, "The United Nations Committee on the Rights of Child (CRC) has urged states to strike a balance between protecting children from sexual exploitation and respecting their evolving autonomy. States should avoid criminalizing consensual and non-exploitative sexual activity among adolescents of similar ages."

This judgment comes in the wake of growing concerns and discussions about the impact of the current age of consent laws on adolescents in romantic relationships. Several high courts have also raised questions regarding the rigid application of the POCSO Act in cases involving consensual relationships between minors.

While this judgment does not change the existing laws, it brings attention to the need for a thoughtful reconsideration of the age of consent and the balance between protecting vulnerable minors and respecting the evolving autonomy of adolescents. It highlights the importance of recognizing the unique circumstances of consensual relationships among teenagers and urges policymakers to address this issue.

The judgment concludes by stating, "Ultimately, it is for the Parliament to ponder upon the said issue... but being cognizant of the cases... involving romantic relationships, a balance between the protection of a vulnerable class and those capable of exercising the power to decide must be necessarily struck."

This judgment is expected to spark further discussions and debates regarding the age of consent laws in India and the need to protect the rights and autonomy of adolescents in the realm of sexuality.

Date of Decision: 10 July 2023

Ashik Ramjan Ansari vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News