Judicial Review Is Not A Substitute For Examiner’s Judgment: Delhi High Court Rejects DJSE Candidate’s Plea Over Alteration of Marks Part-Payments Extend Limitation - Each Payment Revives Limitation: Delhi High Court Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness 304 Part I IPC | Sudden Fight Between Brothers Over Mud House Construction: Jharkhand High Court Converts Murder Conviction To Culpable Homicide When Rape Fails, Section 450 Cannot Stand: Orissa High Court Acquits Accused of House-Trespass After Finding Relationship Consensual Concurrent Eviction Orders Will Not Be Reopened Under Article 227: Madras High Court Section 128 Contract Act | Surety’s Liability Is Co-Extensive: Kerala High Court Upholds Recovery from Guarantors’ Salary Custodial Interrogation Not Warranted When Offences Are Not Punishable With Death or Life: Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Deputy Tahsildar in Land Records Case Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Consumer | No Complete Deficiency In Service — Excess Rainfall Also To Blame: Supreme Court Halves Compensation In Groundnut Seed Crop Failure Case Development Cannot Override The Master Plan: Supreme Court Nullifies Cement Unit CLU In Agricultural Zone Negative Viscera Report Is Not a Passport to Acquittal: Madras High Court Confirms Life Term of Parents for Poisoning Mentally Retarded Daughter Observations Have Had a Demoralising and Chilling Effect: Allahabad High Court Judge Recuses from Bail Matter After Supreme Court’s Strong Remarks Controversial YouTube Remarks On ‘Black Magic Village’ Not A Crime: Gauhati High Court Quashes FIR Against Abhishek Kar “Failure To Specifically Deny Allegations Amounts To Admission”: J&K High Court Reiterates Law Under Order VIII CPC Section 293 Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Examination of Expert When DNA Report Is Disputed: MP High Court Medical Evidence Trumps False Alibi: Allahabad HC Upholds Conviction In Matrimonial Murder Where Strangulation Was Masked By Post-Mortem Burning Helping Young Advocates Is Not A Favour – It Is A Need For A Better Justice System: Rajasthan High Court Section 82 Cr.P.C. | Mere Non-Appearance Does Not Ipsi Facto Establish Absconding: Punjab & Haryana High Court Sets Aside Order Declaring Student Abroad as Proclaimed Person

BOMBAY HIGH COURT HIGHLIGHTS NEED FOR RETHINKING AGE OF CONSENT IN INDIA, PROTECTING ADOLESCENT RIGHTS

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 10 July 2023, In a landmark judgment delivered by the honourable court, a significant emphasis has been placed on the need to reconsider the age of consent in India and ensure the protection of adolescent rights. The judgment, which has garnered attention for its progressive stance, underscores the complexities surrounding consensual sexual relationships involving minors and the implications of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses (POCSO) Act.

The court, in its ruling, expressed concerns about the current legal framework, which deems any sexual activity with a minor as statutory rape, irrespective of the minor's active participation and consent. The judgment highlights the importance of recognizing adolescent rights, including sexual autonomy and protection from unwanted sexual aggression.

Bombay High Court , "The essence of 'consent' lies in the surrounding circumstances, which would lead to an inference of 'consent'... Development of sexuality starts as early as in intrauterine life... Adolescence is a phase of transition during which major developments of sexuality take place... It is during this period, cognitive development takes place and results in the development of thinking and reasoning... Adolescence is a period during which an individual's thought perception as well as response gets colored sexually."

The judgment also acknowledges the influence of external factors such as easy access to information through the internet, movies, and other media platforms on adolescents' sexual curiosity and behavior. It emphasizes the need for responsible moderation of behavior and sexual education to guide adolescents in making informed decisions.

Referring to international standards, the court noted, "The United Nations Committee on the Rights of Child (CRC) has urged states to strike a balance between protecting children from sexual exploitation and respecting their evolving autonomy. States should avoid criminalizing consensual and non-exploitative sexual activity among adolescents of similar ages."

This judgment comes in the wake of growing concerns and discussions about the impact of the current age of consent laws on adolescents in romantic relationships. Several high courts have also raised questions regarding the rigid application of the POCSO Act in cases involving consensual relationships between minors.

While this judgment does not change the existing laws, it brings attention to the need for a thoughtful reconsideration of the age of consent and the balance between protecting vulnerable minors and respecting the evolving autonomy of adolescents. It highlights the importance of recognizing the unique circumstances of consensual relationships among teenagers and urges policymakers to address this issue.

The judgment concludes by stating, "Ultimately, it is for the Parliament to ponder upon the said issue... but being cognizant of the cases... involving romantic relationships, a balance between the protection of a vulnerable class and those capable of exercising the power to decide must be necessarily struck."

This judgment is expected to spark further discussions and debates regarding the age of consent laws in India and the need to protect the rights and autonomy of adolescents in the realm of sexuality.

Date of Decision: 10 July 2023

Ashik Ramjan Ansari vs The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

Latest Legal News