Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Jayram Deshpande in PMLA Case: "Role Not of Generating Proceeds of Crime, but Knowingly Assisted in Money Laundering"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Legal Point of the Judgment: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court, on 29th February 2024, granted bail to Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, a former Sub-Divisional Officer, who was implicated in a money laundering case arising out of environmental violations. The court based its decision on the finding that Deshpande's role was not of generating proceeds of crime but rather assisting in the process of money laundering.

Facts and Issues: Deshpande was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for facilitating illegal land conversion and construction within Coastal Regulation Zone-III. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him for his alleged involvement in aiding money laundering activities associated with unauthorized land development. The case originated from a complaint for violations of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The court noted that the Special Court had observed Deshpande did not generate proceeds of crime but assisted in laundering. It was significant that he was not a beneficiary of the proceeds.

Comparing his role with the co-accused Sadanand Kadam, who was granted bail by the Supreme Court, the High Court found Deshpande's role in the crime to be lesser.

The court scrutinized the details of Deshpande's involvement, emphasizing his role in granting illegal permissions and ignoring regulations for land conversion. Despite his misconduct, the court observed that his actions were more in the realm of assisting the prime accused in the money laundering process.

Decision: The court, considering the observations and circumstances, including the bail granted to co-accused Kadam and acknowledging that Deshpande's role was not of generating but assisting in money laundering, granted bail to Deshpande. This bail was subjected to stringent conditions, including a bond and restrictions on leaving the country and interacting with witnesses or evidence.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande vs Directorate Of Enforcemen

Latest Legal News