Recovery Of Excess Payment Made By Mistake Is Permissible When Employee Furnished An Undertaking To Refund: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Application Under Sec 482 BNSS Is Maintainable Even If No Formal Order Of Arrest Is Passed By CGST Authorities: Allahabad High Court Consensual Physical Relationship Following Three-Year Courtship Does Not Amount To Rape If Marriage Promise Fails: Supreme Court Criminalization Of Civil Disputes | Courts Must Not Engage In Speculative Reasoning While Dealing With Quashing Petitions Under Section 482 CrPC: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money In The Absence Of Proof Of Demand Is Insufficient To Sustain Conviction Under Section 7 And 13 PC Act: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Quash NDPS Proceedings Merely Relying On Jurisprudence Regarding Evidentiary Value Of Confessional Statements: Supreme Court Extra-Judicial Confession Made While In Police Custody Is Inadmissible In Evidence: Supreme Court Taxing Authorities Must Levy Tax Based On The Form Of Goods At The Time Of Sale, Not On Potential End Use: Supreme Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders CBI Probe Into State Corruption Scams After Punjab Police Fails To Act On ED’s Section 66(2) PMLA Referral Section 482 CrPC | FIR Based On Consensual Relationship Gone Sour Cannot Be Sustained To Coerce Marriage: Supreme Court CISF Personnel Soliciting Bribes For Employment Is Guilty Of 'Gross Misconduct' Under Section 18 CISF Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court PIL | State Cannot Use Demolition Powers To Silence Whistleblowers Or Deflect Accountability: Punjab & Haryana High Court Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws Without Specific Allegations Of Overt Acts Constitute Abuse Of Process: Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 9 CPC | Admission In An Abated Suit Does Not Constitute Estoppel Against Landlord In A Fresh Eviction Proceeding: Calcutta High Court Arbitral Award Cannot Be Set Aside For Non-Adjudication Of Claims Specifically Abandoned By Parties: Delhi High Court Mere Long Possession Is Not Adverse Possession; Defendant Must Prove Hostile Animus To Deny Title Of True Owner: Himachal Pradesh High Court Reopening Of Assessment Under Sec 148A(d) Income Tax Act Cannot Be Based On 'Change Of Opinion' Without Fresh Tangible Material: Gujarat High Court Municipal Authorities Must Initiate Formal Proceedings And Grant Opportunity Of Hearing Before Sealing Premises:  Jharkhand High Court Court Cannot Compel Third-Party To Undergo DNA Test Unless Necessary For Just Adjudication: Madhya Pradesh High Court Trial Court Cannot Defer Bail Application Merely Because A Transfer Petition Is Pending In High Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 108 BNS | Mere Taunts Or Harassment Regarding Not Bearing A Male Child Do Not Constitute Abetment To Suicide: Rajasthan High Court Daily-Wage Employees Treated As Permanent Under 1988 Government Resolution Entitled To Annual Increment Benefits: Supreme Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Jayram Deshpande in PMLA Case: "Role Not of Generating Proceeds of Crime, but Knowingly Assisted in Money Laundering"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Legal Point of the Judgment: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court, on 29th February 2024, granted bail to Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, a former Sub-Divisional Officer, who was implicated in a money laundering case arising out of environmental violations. The court based its decision on the finding that Deshpande's role was not of generating proceeds of crime but rather assisting in the process of money laundering.

Facts and Issues: Deshpande was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for facilitating illegal land conversion and construction within Coastal Regulation Zone-III. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him for his alleged involvement in aiding money laundering activities associated with unauthorized land development. The case originated from a complaint for violations of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The court noted that the Special Court had observed Deshpande did not generate proceeds of crime but assisted in laundering. It was significant that he was not a beneficiary of the proceeds.

Comparing his role with the co-accused Sadanand Kadam, who was granted bail by the Supreme Court, the High Court found Deshpande's role in the crime to be lesser.

The court scrutinized the details of Deshpande's involvement, emphasizing his role in granting illegal permissions and ignoring regulations for land conversion. Despite his misconduct, the court observed that his actions were more in the realm of assisting the prime accused in the money laundering process.

Decision: The court, considering the observations and circumstances, including the bail granted to co-accused Kadam and acknowledging that Deshpande's role was not of generating but assisting in money laundering, granted bail to Deshpande. This bail was subjected to stringent conditions, including a bond and restrictions on leaving the country and interacting with witnesses or evidence.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande vs Directorate Of Enforcemen

Latest Legal News