Bail Applicant Under Mandatory Obligation To Disclose Criminal Antecedents, Non-Disclosure Results In Erroneous Decisions: Andhra Pradesh High Court Judicial Decrees Cannot Be Set Aside By Administrative Orders After Decades; Long-Standing Revenue Entries Must Be Protected: Allahabad High Court 'Any Use Whatsoever' Includes Promotion & Events: Bombay High Court Restrains New Indian Express Group From Hosting Commercial Events Outside Southern States Reserved Category Candidates Who Qualify On Their Own Seniority Must Be Adjusted Against Unreserved Vacancies: Calcutta High Court Decree For Possession Can Be Passed If Landlord-Tenant Relationship & Termination Are Admitted; Unregistered Lease Is Month-To-Month: Delhi High Court Prosecution Against Co-Accused Not Sustainable When Main Accused Is Discharged On Same Facts: Jharkhand High Court Admission Of Handwriting On Account Statement Is Not Admission Of Its Contents; Corroborative Evidence Necessary To Prove Claim: Gujarat High Court Omission Of Label Defects In Food Inspector's Spot Memo Fatal To Prosecution For Misbranding: Himachal Pradesh High Court RBI Must Consult State Government, Not Just Registrar, To Supersede Co-operative Bank Board; Principles Of Natural Justice Excluded Under Section 36AAA: Kerala High Court Suit Filed Before IBC Proceedings Cannot Be Dismissed Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC; Section 96 Moratorium Only Stays Pending Actions: Calcutta High Court Senior Citizens Not Technologically Savvy Cannot Be Penalized For Not Checking Case Status On Court Website: Tripura High Court Telangana High Court Quashes Case Against CM Revanth Reddy Over 2019 Election Roadshow, Cites Bar Under Section 195 CrPC Maintenance Tribunal Orders Passed Without Mandated Three-Member Coram Are A Nullity: Punjab & Haryana High Court School Register Entry Regarding Date Of Birth Lacks Probative Value Unless Source Of Information Is Proved: Madhya Pradesh High Court Sets Aside POCSO Conviction Limitation Period For Specific Performance Starts From Date Of Refusal If No Fixed Date Stipulated In Agreement: Karnataka High Court Pensionary Benefits Not ‘Pecuniary Advantage’, Cannot Be Deducted From Income For Motor Accident Compensation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Will | Disinheriting Caring Spouse In Favour Of Non-Relatives Is An ‘Unnatural Disposition’ Raising Grave Suspicion: Supreme Court Registration Does Not Automatically Validate Will If Process Is Shrouded In Suspicion; Testator's Illiteracy Increases Burden On Propounder: Supreme Court Propounder Faces Heavy Burden Of Proof When Testator Is Illiterate; Registration Does Not Cure Unexplained Suspicious Circumstances: Supreme Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Jayram Deshpande in PMLA Case: "Role Not of Generating Proceeds of Crime, but Knowingly Assisted in Money Laundering"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Legal Point of the Judgment: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court, on 29th February 2024, granted bail to Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, a former Sub-Divisional Officer, who was implicated in a money laundering case arising out of environmental violations. The court based its decision on the finding that Deshpande's role was not of generating proceeds of crime but rather assisting in the process of money laundering.

Facts and Issues: Deshpande was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for facilitating illegal land conversion and construction within Coastal Regulation Zone-III. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him for his alleged involvement in aiding money laundering activities associated with unauthorized land development. The case originated from a complaint for violations of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The court noted that the Special Court had observed Deshpande did not generate proceeds of crime but assisted in laundering. It was significant that he was not a beneficiary of the proceeds.

Comparing his role with the co-accused Sadanand Kadam, who was granted bail by the Supreme Court, the High Court found Deshpande's role in the crime to be lesser.

The court scrutinized the details of Deshpande's involvement, emphasizing his role in granting illegal permissions and ignoring regulations for land conversion. Despite his misconduct, the court observed that his actions were more in the realm of assisting the prime accused in the money laundering process.

Decision: The court, considering the observations and circumstances, including the bail granted to co-accused Kadam and acknowledging that Deshpande's role was not of generating but assisting in money laundering, granted bail to Deshpande. This bail was subjected to stringent conditions, including a bond and restrictions on leaving the country and interacting with witnesses or evidence.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande vs Directorate Of Enforcemen

Latest Legal News