Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Possession Implies Constructive Notice: Duty to Inquire Rests on Subsequent Purchasers: Supreme Court Clarifies Bona Fide Purchase Standards Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Jayram Deshpande in PMLA Case: "Role Not of Generating Proceeds of Crime, but Knowingly Assisted in Money Laundering"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Legal Point of the Judgment: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court, on 29th February 2024, granted bail to Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, a former Sub-Divisional Officer, who was implicated in a money laundering case arising out of environmental violations. The court based its decision on the finding that Deshpande's role was not of generating proceeds of crime but rather assisting in the process of money laundering.

Facts and Issues: Deshpande was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for facilitating illegal land conversion and construction within Coastal Regulation Zone-III. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him for his alleged involvement in aiding money laundering activities associated with unauthorized land development. The case originated from a complaint for violations of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The court noted that the Special Court had observed Deshpande did not generate proceeds of crime but assisted in laundering. It was significant that he was not a beneficiary of the proceeds.

Comparing his role with the co-accused Sadanand Kadam, who was granted bail by the Supreme Court, the High Court found Deshpande's role in the crime to be lesser.

The court scrutinized the details of Deshpande's involvement, emphasizing his role in granting illegal permissions and ignoring regulations for land conversion. Despite his misconduct, the court observed that his actions were more in the realm of assisting the prime accused in the money laundering process.

Decision: The court, considering the observations and circumstances, including the bail granted to co-accused Kadam and acknowledging that Deshpande's role was not of generating but assisting in money laundering, granted bail to Deshpande. This bail was subjected to stringent conditions, including a bond and restrictions on leaving the country and interacting with witnesses or evidence.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande vs Directorate Of Enforcemen

Similar News