Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja in Fake Encounter Case After Almost 7 Years in Custody

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent Judgement , the Bombay High Court, in a judgment delivered by Justice Prakash D. Naik, granted bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja in a high-profile fake encounter case. The court observed, "An attempt has been made to strike a balance between the appellant's right to lead evidence of its choice and establish the charges beyond any doubt and simultaneously the respondent's rights guaranteed under Part III of our Constitution have been well protected."

Divya Ashok Pahuja, who has been in custody for nearly 7 years, had filed a bail application (No. 354 of 2023) in connection with the case registered under Sections 302, 193, 182, 201, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as Sections 325 and 327 of the Arms Act. The case pertains to a fake encounter involving the deceased Sandeep Gadoli.

The court considered various factors in its decision, including the prolonged period of incarceration, the lack of progress in the trial, and the fact that the applicant was a woman with no criminal antecedents. It noted that the applicant was in custody for a substantial period, having been arrested on July 14, 2016. The court further highlighted that despite previous orders to expedite the trial, there had been no significant progress.

Justice Naik also emphasized the importance of timely trials and the protection of personal liberty. The court referred to previous Supreme Court judgments that emphasized the need to balance the seriousness of charges with the period of custody and the likelihood of trial completion. It further underscored that the denial of speedy justice posed a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice.

Considering these factors, the court granted bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja, subject to certain conditions. These conditions include executing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with sureties, reporting to the local police station once a month, attending court hearings regularly, providing contact details and a residential address to the trial court, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the country without court permission.

This judgment by the Bombay High Court serves as a significant development in the case, bringing relief to Divya Ashok Pahuja after a prolonged period of incarceration. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring timely trials and protecting the rights of individuals held in custody, striking a balance between the gravity of charges and the period of custody.

Date of Decision: 20th June, 2023

Divya Ashok Pahuja   vs State Of Maharashtra 

Latest Legal News