Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja in Fake Encounter Case After Almost 7 Years in Custody

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent Judgement , the Bombay High Court, in a judgment delivered by Justice Prakash D. Naik, granted bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja in a high-profile fake encounter case. The court observed, "An attempt has been made to strike a balance between the appellant's right to lead evidence of its choice and establish the charges beyond any doubt and simultaneously the respondent's rights guaranteed under Part III of our Constitution have been well protected."

Divya Ashok Pahuja, who has been in custody for nearly 7 years, had filed a bail application (No. 354 of 2023) in connection with the case registered under Sections 302, 193, 182, 201, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, as well as Sections 325 and 327 of the Arms Act. The case pertains to a fake encounter involving the deceased Sandeep Gadoli.

The court considered various factors in its decision, including the prolonged period of incarceration, the lack of progress in the trial, and the fact that the applicant was a woman with no criminal antecedents. It noted that the applicant was in custody for a substantial period, having been arrested on July 14, 2016. The court further highlighted that despite previous orders to expedite the trial, there had been no significant progress.

Justice Naik also emphasized the importance of timely trials and the protection of personal liberty. The court referred to previous Supreme Court judgments that emphasized the need to balance the seriousness of charges with the period of custody and the likelihood of trial completion. It further underscored that the denial of speedy justice posed a threat to public confidence in the administration of justice.

Considering these factors, the court granted bail to Divya Ashok Pahuja, subject to certain conditions. These conditions include executing a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with sureties, reporting to the local police station once a month, attending court hearings regularly, providing contact details and a residential address to the trial court, not tampering with evidence, and not leaving the country without court permission.

This judgment by the Bombay High Court serves as a significant development in the case, bringing relief to Divya Ashok Pahuja after a prolonged period of incarceration. The decision underscores the importance of ensuring timely trials and protecting the rights of individuals held in custody, striking a balance between the gravity of charges and the period of custody.

Date of Decision: 20th June, 2023

Divya Ashok Pahuja   vs State Of Maharashtra 

Latest Legal News