Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Afroz Khan Shahid Khan Pathan in UAPA Case, Citing Lack of Substantive Evidence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant development, the Bombay High Court, in a judgment pronounced on June 22, 2023, has granted bail to Afroz Khan Shahid Khan Pathan, who was convicted under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The court, comprising Hon'ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere and Hon'ble Justice Gauri Godse, suspended the applicant's sentence and ordered his release on bail, citing a lack of substantive evidence to support the allegations.

Afroz Khan Shahid Khan Pathan, a 41-year-old pharmacist residing in Majalgoan, District Beed, Maharashtra, had appealed against his conviction. The court heard the arguments from both the applicant's counsel, Mr. Mubin Solkar with Mr. Tahir Hussain, and the prosecution, represented by Mr. Raja Thakare, Senior Advocate, along with Ms. S. S. Kaushik, Assistant Public Prosecutor, and Mr. Siddharth Jagushte.

The judgment highlighted that the prosecution heavily relied on confessional statements, call detail records (CDRs), and an email as evidence against the applicant. However, the court examined the confessions made by co-accused Mohammed Amir (A-1) and Aakif (A-11) and found no corroborative material or evidence to substantiate the allegations that the applicant had visited Bangladesh to collect funds.

Bombay High court observed, "There is no evidence on record to show that the applicant visited Bangladesh to collect funds as alleged by the prosecution." It further noted that the confessions of the co-accused did not clearly establish the applicant's involvement in the alleged crimes or his knowledge of the purpose for which he was sent to Bangladesh.

The court also considered an email sent by the applicant to Mohammed Amir (A-11) but found it to be inconclusive and not incriminating. The absence of a Section 65B Certificate, which authenticates electronic evidence, further weakened the prosecution's case. The court acknowledged that the applicant had been in custody for 17 years, during which he pursued educational endeavors, completed a yoga course, and engaged in counseling and de-radicalization sessions within the prison.

Citing these factors, the court concluded that the applicant had made a prima facie case for the suspension of his sentence and granted him bail. However, the court imposed specific conditions, including the submission of a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 50,000 and regular reporting to the ATS. The applicant was also directed to deposit his passport, inform the court and investigating authorities of any changes in address or contact details, and obtain permission before leaving Maharashtra.

This judgment holds significance as it emphasizes the importance of substantive evidence in criminal cases and highlights the need for proper adherence to procedural requirements when introducing electronic evidence. The granting of bail to Afroz Khan Shahid Khan Pathan after 17 years in custody underscores the court's recognition of his educational pursuits and rehabilitation efforts.

Date of Decision: 22nd June 2023

Afroz Khan Shahid vs The State of Maharashtra

Latest Legal News