Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Bombay High Court Fines University for Discriminatory Denial of Ph.D. Admission to Meritorious Student

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgment, the Bombay High Court imposed a fine on a university for its discriminatory denial of admission to a meritorious student seeking entry into the Ph.D. program in Fine Arts. The court strongly criticized the university's callous attitude, which resulted in the student losing valuable years of academic progress.

The judgment highlighted the following points:

"Denial of admission to Ph.D. program is arbitrary and reflects highhandedness."

"The university violated its own procedure by issuing an advertisement for admission without verifying vacancies."

"The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste candidate, secured the highest marks in the Ph.D. Entrance Test and should not have been denied admission."

"Instances of quota exceedance in other subjects demonstrate a lack of consistency in university policies."

"The university's failure to provide a research guide within the validity period of the PET score caused undue hardship to the petitioner."

"The university's attitude is callous and has resulted in frustration and harassment for the student."

The Bombay High Court imposed a fine of Rs. 50,000 on the university, which must be paid to the petitioner as compensation for the injustice suffered.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of fair and consistent admission procedures in educational institutions, especially when it comes to safeguarding the academic interests of meritorious students.

Date of Decision: 17.10.2023

Nilesh vs The State of Maharashtra

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/17_Oct_2023_Nilesh_Vs_State_BombHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News